Li Shan

John Stuart Mill's philosophy of logic has been used as the main representative of the psychological doctrine. But in recent years, a growing number of Western philosophy scholars pointed out that Mill's views and positions actually suffered a misreading. In fact, as long as I am more careful study of classic texts Mueller, we can easily find Mill's psychological doctrine of their own to do a strict limit: one hand, he asserted, as an art of logic from as a The logic of science get all of the theoretical basis, but as a general logic of science but on the part of psychology; other hand, he asserted that logic you can get from the psychological theory of structural aspects of revelation. But he did not advocate general logic must seek from the psychological theory of the foundation. John Stuart Mill's philosophy of logic has always been regarded as the main representative of psychologism. In recent years, however, more and more western scholars point out that Mill's points of view and theoretical position have been misunderstood. In fact, once we take a closer examination on some of his classical texts, it's not very difficult for us to find that Mill's psychologism was strictly limited by himself. On the one hand, he asserted that the logic as an art got its theoretical basis from the logic as a science, which , in a very broad sense, was taken as a part of psychology, and on the other hand, he also asserted that logic could receive some enlightenment regarding how to construct a theory from psychology. But he never held such a general view that logic must seek its theoretical foundation from psychology

Extensive application of modern scientific and technological achievements to the people that: modern science and technology in particular the application of its departure from the place to be valuable. Western thinkers rational criticism of the technology is essentially a critique of scientific and technological alienation. The face value of the departure from the science and technology and the need for technological development to provide reasonable values, in the process of scientific research and technology applications of interest to follow the principles and adhere to the scale of justice, to maximize the well being of the purpose for all mankind. China wants to avoid the adverse impact of science and technology, we need to Western civilization in the scientific and democratic spirit and the traditional Chinese culture, integrating the human spirit, to establish a model of development suited to their characteristics. It proves that the application of modern science and technology is separated from its values ​​which ought to have with the extensive application of modern technology. In fact, western thinkers criticize the technological rationality which is directly to criticize the alienation of technology. It is necessary to provide reasonable value principles for technological development to resolve the problem and to take the principles of interest and justice in scientific research and technology applications for the benefits of the whole human beings. In order to avoid the devastating impact of modernization characteristics, China should integrate both the spirit of science and democracy in Western civilization and the humanism of traditional Chinese culture to establish a mode of development with its peculiar