-
28The Power of Courage in Plato's RepublicJournal of the History of Philosophy 62 (1): 1-23. 2024.Abstractabstract:This paper offers a new interpretation of courage in Plato's Republic. Despite the attention that this dialogue has received in the past, scholars have been disinclined to explore the metaphysics of the virtues. I argue that courage is, by its very nature, a δύναμις of the sort described in book 5. In particular, I argue that courage is the power over reason's correct practical deliberations about what one ought to do and that it accomplishes the preservation of these deliberati…Read more
-
610What are the Wages of Justice? Rethinking Plato's Division of GoodsPhronesis 65 (1): 1-26. 2020.Against the standard view that the Republic’s division of goods distinguishes between intrinsic and instrumental value, a growing number of scholars have correctly argued that goods possess value δι᾽ αὑτό in virtue of some of their causal effects. However, these scholars have not yet given a convincing and principled account of what it means to be valuable διὰ τὰ γιγνόμενα ἀπ’ αὐτοῦ such that some effects can contribute to the value a good has δι᾽ αὑτό. In this paper I offer such an account.
-
Review of Dixsaut, Plato-Nietzsche: Philosophy the Other Way (review)Bryn Mawr Classical Review 1. 2018.
-
180Legein to What End?Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (2): 176-182. 2019.In the 5th century a number of sophists challenged the orthodox understanding of morality and claimed that practicing injustice was the best and most profitable way for an individual to live. Although a number of responses to sophistic immoralism were made, one argument, in fact coming from a pair of sophists, has not received the attention it deserves. According to the argument I call Immortal Repute, self-interested individuals should reject immorality and cultivate virtue instead, for only a …Read more
-
390Immorality or Immortality? An Argument for VirtueRhetorica 2 (37): 97-119. 2019.In the 5th century a number of sophists challenged the orthodox understanding of morality and claimed that practicing injustice was the best and most profitable way for an individual to live. Although a number of responses to sophistic immoralism were made, one argument, in fact coming from a pair of sophists, has not received the attention it deserves. According to the argument I call Immortal Repute, self-interested individuals should reject immorality and cultivate virtue instead, for only a …Read more
-
161Thrasymachus’ Sophistic Account of Justice in Republic iAncient Philosophy 36 (1): 151-172. 2016.In this paper, I oppose the now-dominant view that Thrasymachus offers a definition of justice in Book I of the Republic. This way of interpretation Thrasymachus does not pay sufficient attention to the methodological assumptions he makes during his disagreement with Socrates. To better understand Socrates’ antagonist, it is crucial to remember that he was, in fact, a sophist. I argue that what the character Thrasymachus is doing in Book I is importantly akin to a certain genre of sophistic argu…Read more
-
University College LondonDepartment of Philosophy
Keeling Center for Ancient PhilosophyKeeling Research Fellow
London, London, City of, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Areas of Specialization
History of Western Philosophy |
Value Theory |
Areas of Interest
History of Western Philosophy |
Value Theory |