-
118Normativity and Agency: Themes from the Philosophy of Christine M. Korsgaard (edited book)Oxford University Press. 2022.Christine M. Korsgaard has had a profound influence on moral philosophy over the past forty years. Through her writing and teaching she has developed a distinctive, rigorous, and historically informed way of thinking about ethics, agency, and the normative dimension of human life more generally. The twelve original essays in this volume are written in her honor on the occasion of her retirement from teaching. They engage questions that recur in her work: Why are we obligated to do what morality …Read more
-
68Animal nature within and without: A comment on Korsgaard's Fellow CreaturesPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 105 (1): 230-235. 2022.
-
118Kant's Approach to the Theory of Human AgencyIn Ruth Chang & Kurt Sylvan (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason, Routledge. pp. 160-171. 2020.This chapter is about philosophical method. The Kantian method in the theory of agency is often characterized as a “first-person” method. But what does this mean? I motivate this question by showing how Kantians and most non-Kantians routinely fail to communicate when debating each other about the nature of human agency. I trace this failure to a more fundamental difference in philosophical method, one that tends to go unacknowledged. Most non-Kantian theories of agency, including belief/desire …Read more
-
136Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and WillOxford University Press. 2021.Feeling like doing something is not the same as deciding to do it. When you feel like doing something, you are still free to decide to do it or not. You are having an inclination to do it, but you are not thereby determined to do it. I call this the moment of drama. This book is about what you are faced with, in this moment. How should you relate to the inclinations you “have,” given that you are free to “act on” them or not? To answer this question, we need an account of what sort of thing we a…Read more
-
150Foregrounding Desire: A Defense of Kant’s Incorporation ThesisThe Journal of Ethics 15 (3): 147-167. 2011.In this paper I defend Kant’s Incorporation Thesis, which holds that we must “incorporate” our incentives into our maxims if we are to act on them. I see this as a thesis about what is necessary for a human being to make the transition from ‘having a desire’ to ‘acting on it’. As such, I consider the widely held view that ‘having a desire’ involves being focused on the world, and not on ourselves or on the desire. I try to show how this view is connected with a denial of any deep distinction bet…Read more
-
1Caring for Our Principles: Action Under Nonideal ConditionsDissertation, Harvard University. 1997.Kant's moral theory demands that we interact with others on the basis of reason rather than force. In deciding what to do, we are to reject any actions which depend for their efficacy upon bypassing the consent of others, whether through deception, coercion, or outright violence. In this sense, Kantianism puts forth a strongly anti-paternalistic, anti-manipulative ideal of human relations. And yet there are many situations in which we feel it can be permissible or even obligatory to act in pater…Read more
-
393What are Theories of Desire Theories of?Analytic Philosophy 55 (2): 131-150. 2014.In this paper I try to undermine complacency with a predominant conception of desire, for the sake of refocusing attention on a philosophical problem. The predominant conception holds that to have a desire is to occupy an evaluative outlook, a perspective from which the agent 'sees' the world in practically salient terms. I argue that it is not clear what this theory is a theory of, because the concept of desire at its center is deeply ambiguous. Understood as a theory of desire in what I call t…Read more
-
167On the relation between wanting and willingPhilosophical Issues 22 (1): 334-350. 2012.In this paper I develop an analogy between an interpersonal hierarchy and an intrapersonal hierarchy. The analogy is between the authority of adults over children, and the authority of our willing selves over our wanting selves. The analogy allows us to see how each hierarchy is rooted in an asymmetry that is natural and not merely conventional.
-
437The nature of inclinationEthics 119 (2). 2009.There is a puzzle in the very notion of passive motivation ("passion" or "inclination"). To be motivated is not simply to be moved from the outside. Motivation is in some sense self-movement. But how can an agent be passive with respect to her own motivation? How is passive motivation possible? In this paper I defend the ancient view that inclination stems from a motivational source independent of reason, a motivational source that is both agential and nonrational.
-
343Kantian rigorism and mitigating circumstancesEthics 117 (1). 2006.A task of any moral theory is to account for both the rigidity and the flexibility of moral rules. Utilitarianism faces the problem of building rigidity into a framework that tends towards objectionable flexibility. Kantianism faces the problem of building flexibility into a framework that tends towards objectionable rigidity. I offer an argument on this front on behalf of Kantians. I show how Kantians can maintain that actions are right and wrong "in themselves," while still maintaining that su…Read more
-
186On Christine Korsgaard’s “Aristotle and Kant on the Source of Value”Ethics 125 (4): 1123-1126. 2015.
-
133“Let’s J!”: on the practical character of shared agencyPhilosophical Studies 172 (12): 3399-3407. 2015.Drawing on parallels in Hutcheson and Hume, I raise two worries about Bratman’s theory of shared agency. First, has Bratman captured the interpersonal character of shared agency? Second, has he captured its practical character? By “its practical character,” I mean the sense in which shared agency is something we can undertake under that description, and not just a condition we might happen to find ourselves in? I argue that Bratman’s theory falls short of answering this second worry. The source …Read more
-
69Onora O'Neill, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning (review)Philosophical Review 108 (1): 97-100. 1999.Towards Justice and Virtue is Onora O’Neill’s most developed account thus far of her distinctive approach to moral and political philosophy. Readers who are already familiar with O’Neill’s articles and her two previous books will appreciate the way it brings together in one sustained and rigorous argument the various themes which have occupied her attention over the years. Those who are new to O’Neill’s work will find in it a lucid, accessible, and provocative challenge to contemporary ethical t…Read more
-
86Review of Talbot Brewer, The Retrieval of Ethics (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (12). 2009.
-
445Three conceptions of action in moral theoryNoûs 35 (1). 2001.The utilitarian conception, which I call “action as production,” holds that action is a way of making use of the world, conceived as a causal mechanism. According to the rational intuitionist conception, which I call “action as assertion,” action is a way of acknowledging the value in the world, conceived as a realm of status. On the Kantian constructivist conception, which I call “action as participation,” action is a way of making the world, qua causal mechanism, come to count as a realm of st…Read more
-
324Compliance, Complicity, and the Nature of Nonideal ConditionsJournal of Philosophy 100 (7): 329-355. 2003.
-
10. Tara Smith, Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: The Virtuous Egoist Tara Smith, Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: The Virtuous Egoist (pp. 394-397) (review)In John Hawthorne (ed.), Ethics, Wiley Periodicals. 2004.
-
221Desires as demands: How the second-person standpoint might be internal to reflective agencyPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1): 229-236. 2010.
-
84Empathy as a Moral Concept: Comments on John Deigh's "Empathy, Justice, and Jurisprudence"Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1): 91-98. 2011.In these brief comments, I explore some ambiguities concerning John Deigh's notion of empathy in relation to morality and justice. First, does Deigh conceive of empathy as a morally neutral capacity that can be used for good or bad purposes or, rather, as a capacity that presupposes a moral orientation? I look to his previous work and find evidence supporting both readings. I suggest that the right way to understand empathy is as a moral notion. Empathy is the product of an activity—the activity…Read more
Areas of Specialization
Meta-Ethics |
Normative Ethics |
History of Ethics |
Values and Norms |