Bulgakov and Goethe living in different countries, different times, different cultural backgrounds, the "Master and Margarita" and "Faust" is surprisingly similar. Two works have in common the spirit of philosophy, the subject of similar performance, similar to the plot elements and characters closely associated with shape. At the same time, they have their own unique artistic creation and extraordinary aesthetic value. "Master and Margarita" for "Faust" is a continuation of and learn from, more…
Read moreBulgakov and Goethe living in different countries, different times, different cultural backgrounds, the "Master and Margarita" and "Faust" is surprisingly similar. Two works have in common the spirit of philosophy, the subject of similar performance, similar to the plot elements and characters closely associated with shape. At the same time, they have their own unique artistic creation and extraordinary aesthetic value. "Master and Margarita" for "Faust" is a continuation of and learn from, more recycling and beyond. In spite of living in different countries, times and cultural background, Bulgakov and Goethe represented remarkable resemblances in their respective works, Master and Margaret and Faustus. The two masterpieces shared interacting philosophical spirits, relevant themes, similar plots and resemble characters. But on the other hand, the two works are characterized by their own unique artistic creation and aesthetic value. This paper tries to prove that Master and Margaret not only inherited and drew lessons from Faustus, but more importantly, reproduced and surpassed the artistic value of Faustus