Department Affiliates
Department Activity
Details
-
MA program offered
-
PhD program offered
Also at University of Arizona
-
Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons, Expressivism, Yes! Relativism, No!Oxford Studies in Metaethics 1 73-98. 2006.
-
Terence Horgan and Mark Timmons, Expressivism, yes! Relativism, no!In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 1, Clarendon Press. 2006.
-
Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons, Metaethics After Moore (edited book)Oxford University Press UK. 2006.
-
Mark Timmons, Ethical Objectivity Humanly Speaking: Reflections on Putnam’s Ethics without OntologyContemporary Pragmatism 3 (2): 27-38. 2006.
-
N. T. Potter and Mark Timmons, Morality and Universality: Essays on Ethical UniversalizabilitySpringer Verlag. 2006.
-
Mark Timmons, Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative EssaysPhilosophical Review 115 (3): 399-403. 2006.
-
Joshua Alexander and Jonathan Weinberg, Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophyPhilosophy Compass 2 (1). 2006.
-
Ron Mallon and Jonathan Weinberg, Innateness as Closed Process InvariancePhilosophy of Science 73 (3): 323-344. 2006.
-
Jonathan Weinberg, What's epistemology for? The case for neopragmatism in normative metaepistemologyIn Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology futures, Oxford University Press. pp. 26--47. 2006.
-
Paul Russell and Michael McKenna, Free Will and Reactive Attitudes: Perspectives on P. F. Strawson’s “Freedom and Resentment‘ (edited book)Routledge. 2006.
-
Jason Turner and Eddy Nahmias, Are the folk agent-causationists?Mind and Language 21 (5): 597-609. 2006.
-
Jason Turner, Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris, and Thomas Nadelhoffer, Is Incompatibilism Intuitive?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1): 28-53. 2006.
-
-
-
David Schmidtz, What We Deserve, and how We ReciprocateThe Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4): 435-464. 2005.
-
-
Stewart Cohen, Why Basic Knowledge is Easy KnowledgePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2): 417-430. 2005.
-
Mark Timmons, The Practical and Philosophical Significance of Kant's Universality Formulations of the Categorical ImperativeIn B. Sharon Byrd & Jan C. Joerdan (eds.), Philosophica Practica Universalis: Festschrift for Joachim Hruschka, Jahrbuch fur Recht und Ethik (Annual Review of Law and Ethics), Duncker Und Humblot. 2005.
-
Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons, Moral phenomenology and moral theoryPhilosophical Issues 15 (1). 2005.
-
Mark Timmons, The Philosophical and Practical Significance of Kant’s Universality Formulations of the Categorical ImperativeJahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 13. 2005.
-
Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and Jason Turner, Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibilityPhilosophical Psychology 18 (5): 561-584. 2005.
-
-
Margaret A. Boden, Richard B. Brandt, Peter Caldwell, Fred Feldman, John Martin Fischer, Richard Hare, David Benatar, W. D. Joske, Immanuel Kant, Frederick Kaufman, James Lenman, John Leslie, Steven Luper, Michaelis Michael, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, Derek Parfit, George Pitcher, Stephen E. Rosenbaum, David Schmidtz, Arthur Schopenhauer, David B. Suits, Richard Taylor, and Bernard Williams, Life, Death, and Meaning: Key Philosophical Readings on the Big Questions (edited book)Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 2004.
-
David Schmidtz, Satisficing as a humanly rational strategyIn Michael Byron (ed.), Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason, Cambridge University Press. pp. 30--59. 2004.
-
David Schmidtz and Sarah Wright, What Nozick did for decision theoryMidwest Studies in Philosophy 28 (1). 2004.
-
Matt Zwolinski and David Schmidtz, Virtue ethics and repugnant conclusionsIn Philip Cafaro & Ronald Sandler (eds.), Environmental Virtue Ethics, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 107--17. 2004.
-
Richard Andrew Healey, Change without change, and how to observe it in general relativitySynthese 141 (3). 2004.
-
Richard Andrew Healey, Gauge theories and holismsStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (4): 619-642. 2004.
-
Mark Timmons, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-consequentialist Theory of MoralityPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1): 240-243. 2004.
-
Mark Timmons, Moral contractualism is a type of view in ethics that attempts to justify morality, or at least a part of it, by appealing to some sort of rational or reasonable agreement among individuals. 1 In What We Owe to Each Other, TM Scanlon defends a contractualist account of that part of morality that concerns our obligations toIn Philip Stratton-Lake (ed.), On What We Owe to Each Other, Blackwell. pp. 90. 2004.