-
Harold Kincaid and Jeroen Van Bouwel, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science (edited book)Oxford University Press. 2023.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, How to deal with values in political science?In Harold Kincaid & Jeroen Van Bouwel (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science, Oxford University Press. 2023.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Strengthening the Epistemic Case against Epistocracy and for DemocracySocial Epistemology 37 (1): 110-126. 2023.
-
Harold Kincaid and Jeroen Van Bouwel, Putting philosophy of political science on the mapIn Harold Kincaid & Jeroen van Bouwel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science, Oxford University Press. pp. 1-14. 2023.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, “That’s Your Bloody GDP, Not Ours.” On Citizen Engagement, Values, and the Case for Citizen EconomicsOeconomia 13 (1): 49-86. 2023.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, How to Deal with Values in Political Science?In Harold Kincaid & Jeroen van Bouwel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science, Oxford University Press. pp. 493-520. 2023.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Are transparency and representativeness of values hampering scientific pluralism?In Péter Hartl & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Science, Freedom, Democracy, Routledge. pp. 181-205. 2021.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make a Case for Methodological Individualism?Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (2): 263-282. 2019.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Dealing with values in political science (review)Book of Abstracts to the Philosophy and Methodology of Political Science Conference in Pullman, Wa in September 2019. 2019.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel and Michiel Van Oudheusden, Participation Beyond Consensus? Technology Assessments, Consensus Conferences and Democratic ModulationSocial Epistemology 31 (6): 497-513. 2017.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, 'Beyond consensus? A Reply to Alan Irwin.'Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (10): 48-53. 2017.
-
Anton Froeyman, Laszlo Kosolosky, and Jeroen Van Bouwel, Introduction: Social Epistemology Meets the Philosophy of the HumanitiesFoundations of Science 21 (1): 1-13. 2016.
-
Erik Weber, Leen De Vreese, and Jeroen Van Bouwel, How do we Have to Investigate Scientific Explanation?Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 78 (3): 489-524. 2016.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Towards Democratic Models of Science: Exploring the Case of Scientific PluralismPerspectives on Science 23 (2): 149-172. 2015.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Explanatory Strategies beyond The Individualism/Holism DebateIn Julie Zahle & Finn Collin (eds.), Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, Springer. pp. 105-119. 2014.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Pluralists about Pluralism? Versions of Explanatory Pluralism in Psychiatry.In M. C. Galavotti, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, Th Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), New Directions in Philosophy of Science (The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective Series), Springer. pp. 105-119. 2014.
-
Laszlo Laszlo and Jeroen Van Bouwel, 'Explicating ways of consensus-making: Distinguishing the academic, the interface and the meta-consensusIn Martini Carlo (ed.), Experts and Consensus in Social Science, Springer. pp. 71-92. 2014.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Book Review of "Unsimple Truths. Science, Complexity and Policy" by Sandra Mitchell (2009) (Reprint)International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group Newsletter 26-33. 2012.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, What is there beyond Mertonian and dollar green science? Exploring the contours of epistemic democracy.In Robrecht Vanderbeeken, Frederik Le Roy, Christel Stalpaert & Diederik Aerts (eds.), Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science., Springer. pp. 35-48. 2012.
-
Jeroen van Bouwel, An atlas for the social world: what should it (not) look like? Interdisciplinarity and pluralism in the social sciences.In D. Aerts, B. D'Hooghe, R. Pinxten & I. Wallerstein (eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Worlds, Cultures and Society, World Scientific.. 2011.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel and Erik Weber, Explanation in the Social Sciences.In Ian Jarvie Jesus Zamora Bonilla (ed.), The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences., Sage Publications. 2011.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Erik Weber, and Leen De Vreese, Indispensability arguments in favour of reductive explanations.Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1): 33-46. 2011.
-
Jeroen Van Bouwel, Erik Weber, and Leen De Vreese, Indispensability Arguments in Favour of Reductive ExplanationsJournal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1): 33-46. 2011.
-
Jeroen van Bouwel, Why social emergence? Discussing the use of analytical metaphysics in social theory.In Robrecht Vanderbeeken & Bart D'Hooghe (eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us: Studies of Analytical Metaphysics., World Scientific. 2010.
-
Erik Weber, Jeroen Van Bouwel, and Merel Lefevere, The role of unification in explanations of factsIn Henk de Regt, Samir Okasha & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009., Springer. 2010.
-
Leen De Vreese, Erik Weber, and Jeroen Van Bouwel, Explanatory pluralism in the medical sciences: Theory and practiceTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (5): 371-390. 2010.
-
Erik Weber and Jeroen Van Bouwel, Causation, Unification, and the Adequacy of Explanations of FactsTheoria 24 (3): 301-320. 2010.
-
Jeroen van Bouwel, Causation, Unification, and the Adequacy of Explanations of FactsTheoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 24 (3): 301-320. 2009.