Department Affiliates
Department Activity
Details
-
PhD program offered
Also at Ohio State University
-
Sandra Lapointe and Christopher Pincock, Innovations in the History of Analytical PhilosophyPalgrave-Macmillan. 2017.
-
Christopher Pincock, Part II. Does mathematical explanation require mathematical truth?: Mathematical explanation requires mathematical truthIn Shamik Dasgupta, Brad Weslake & Ravit Dotan (eds.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science, Routledge. 2017.
-
Christopher Pincock, Part II. Does mathematical explanation require mathematical truth?: Mathematical explanation requires mathematical truthIn Shamik Dasgupta, Brad Weslake & Ravit Dotan (eds.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science, Routledge. 2017.
-
Tristram McPherson and David Plunkett, The Nature and Explanatory Ambitions of MetaethicsIn Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, Routledge. pp. 1-28. 2017.
-
David Faraci and Tristram McPherson, Ethical Judgment and MotivationIn Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, Routledge. pp. 308-323. 2017.
-
David Enoch and Tristram McPherson, What do you mean “This isn’t the question”?Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (6): 820-840. 2017.
-
Dana Howard, The Medical Surrogate as Fiduciary AgentJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3): 402-420. 2017.
-
Katie Byron and Dana Howard, ‘Hey everybody, don't get pregnant’: Zika, WHO and an ethical framework for advisingJournal of Medical Ethics 43 (5): 334-338. 2017.
-
Dana Howard, Disability, Wellbeing, and (In)Apt EmotionsIn Jessica Flanigan (ed.), The Ethics of Ability and Enhancement, Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 57-78. 2017.
-
Michael Bertrand, Fundamental ontological structure: an argument against pluralismPhilosophical Studies 174 (5): 1277-1297. 2017.
-
Michael D. Bertrand and Jack Mulder, Why Christians Should Not Be Kaneans about FreedomPhilosophia Christi 19 (2): 315-329. 2017.
-
Michael Bertrand, Review of Kenneth Aizawa and Carl Gillett’s Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Grounding (review)British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Review of Books. 2017.
-
Eden Lin, Attraction, Description and the Desire-Satisfaction Theory of WelfareJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (1): 1-8. 2016.
-
Eden Lin, The Subjective List Theory of Well-BeingAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (1): 99-114. 2016.
-
Declan Smithies, Belief and Self‐Knowledge: Lessons From Moore's ParadoxPhilosophical Issues 26 (1): 393-421. 2016.
-
Abraham Roth, Intention, Expectation, and Promissory ObligationEthics 127 (1): 88-115. 2016.
-
Richard Samuels, The Concept of Innateness as an Object of Empirical EnquiryIn Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy, Blackwell. 2016.
-
Shaun Nichols and Richard Samuels, Chapter 2 - Bayesian Psychology and Human RationalityIn T. W. Hung & Timothy Joseph Lane (eds.), Rationality: Constraints and Contexts, 1st Edition, Academic Press. 2016.
-
Stewart Shapiro, Mathematics in Philosophy, Philosophy in Mathematics: Three Case StudiesIn Francesca Boccuni & Andrea Sereni (eds.), Objectivity, Realism, and Proof. FilMat Studies in the Philosophy of Mathematics, Springer International Publishing. pp. 1-9. 2016.
-
Stewart Shapiro and Eric Snyder, Vagueness and ContextInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (4): 343-381. 2016.
-
Øystein Linnebo, Stewart Shapiro, and Geoffrey Hellman, Aristotelian ContinuaPhilosophia Mathematica 24 (2): 214-246. 2016.
-
Stewart Shapiro, What Numbers Could Be; What Objects Could BeIn Fabrice Pataut (ed.), Truth, Objects, Infinity: New Perspectives on the Philosophy of Paul Benacerraf, Springer Verlag. pp. 177-191. 2016.
-
Piers Norris Turner, Mill and Modern LiberalismIn Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill, Wiley. 2016.
-
Christopher Pincock, Comments on A. Casullo’s Essays on a priori knowledge and justificationPhilosophical Studies 173 (6): 1687-1694. 2016.
-
Christopher Pincock, Ian Hacking why is there philosophy of mathematics at all? (review)British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3): 907-912. 2016.