• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition

Université de Poitiers
Department of Philosophy

Follow
News Feed

Department Affiliates

  • 4
    Regular faculty
  • 1
    Other faculty
  • Retired faculty
  • Graduate students
  • Undergraduates
  • 3
    Alumni
  • Other

Department Activity

  •  News and Updates
  •  Publications
 More details

Details

Also at Université de Poitiers

  • All departments
  • Other departments

Department Affiliates

  • 4
    Regular faculty
  • 1
    Other faculty
  • Retired faculty
  • Graduate students
  • Undergraduates
  • 3
    Alumni
  • Other

Department Activity

  •  News and Updates
  •  Publications

Also at Université de Poitiers

  • All departments
  • Other departments

  • Samuel Vitel, The “second Enlightenment”: Rortyan or Hegelian? (forthcoming)
    Philosophical Topics. forthcoming.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Samuel Vitel and Gilles Marmasse, L’École de Pittsburgh face à Kant et Hegel (edited book)
    . 2026.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel Photo of Gilles Marmasse
  • Samuel Vitel, La réhabilitation de l’idéalisme à Pittsburgh
    Archives de Philosophie 89 (1): 109-127. 2025.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Gilles Marmasse and Samuel Vitel, Avant-propos
    Archives de Philosophie 89 (1): 7-11. 2025.
    Photo of Gilles Marmasse Photo of Gilles Marmasse Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Samuel Vitel, Robert B. Pippin, The Culmination. Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy, Chicago & London, University of Chicago Press, 2024, 220 p. (review)
    Archives de Philosophie 2025 (, Bulletin hégélien XXXV). 2025.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem and Sébastien Duchêne, Reasonable Precaution or Unjust Discrimination? Applying a Lexical Utility Model of the Precautionary Principle to Moral Choices
    Journal of Business Ethics 200 (1): 175-188. 2025.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Samuel Vitel, Y a-t-il quelqu’un qui pense?
    Archives de Philosophie 87 (3): 81-98. 2024.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem and Cyrille Imbert, Explaining Scientific Collaboration: A General Functional Account
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75 (4): 993-1017. 2024.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem Photo of Cyrille Imbert Photo of Cyrille Imbert
  • Samuel Vitel, Hegel : de la philosophie à l’histoire de la philosophie (et retour)
    Ithaque 32 (Printemps 2023): 145-168. 2023.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Samuel Vitel, Robert Brandom, Pragmatism and Idealism. Rorty and Hegel on Reason and Representation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 160 p. (review)
    Archives de Philosophie (Bulletin de littérature hégélien). 2023.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Samuel Vitel, Graham Priest, Explorer les contradictions. Paraconsistance et dialéthéisme, trad. Frédéric Berland et Arthur Cohen, Paris, Hermann, 2022, 102 p. (review)
    Archives de Philosophie 2023 (Bulletin hégélien XXXIII). 2023.
    Photo of Samuel Vitel
  • Cyrille Imbert, Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Vincent Chevrier, and Christine Bourjot, Improving deliberations by reducing misrepresentation effects
    Episteme 17 (4): 403-419. 2020.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem Photo of Cyrille Imbert Photo of Cyrille Imbert
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle. Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy
    Ethics, Policy and Environment 22 (1): 103-105. 2019.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Scientific Expertise and Risk Aggregation
    Philosophy of Science 86 (1): 124-144. 2019.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Conor Mayo-Wilson, and Michael Weisberg, Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge (edited book)
    Oxford University Press. 2017.
    Photo of Michael Weisberg Photo of Conor Mayo-Wilson Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Scientific expertise, risk assessment, and majority voting
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Sébastien Duchêne, and Eric Guerci, Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy
    Theory and Decision 81 (4): 479-510. 2016.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Les interprétations de la mécanique quantique : une vue d'ensemble introductive
    Implications Philosophiques. 2015.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Qu'est-ce que la mécanique quantique?
    Vrin. 2015.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem and Cyrille Imbert, Scientific Collaboration: Do Two Heads Need to Be More than Twice Better than One?
    Philosophy of Science 82 (4): 667-688. 2015.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem Photo of Cyrille Imbert Photo of Cyrille Imbert
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Layers of Models in Computer Simulations
    International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (4): 417-436. 2014.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? Or, whether scientists should publish intermediate results
    Synthese 191 (1): 17-35. 2014.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem and Anouk Barberousse, Interpréter une théorie physique
    Methodos 13. 2013.
    Photo of Anouk Barberousse Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? Or, whether scientists should publish intermediate results
    Synthese 191 (1): 17-35. 2011.
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Majority Judgment for Collective Beliefs and Science
    Photo of Thomas Boyer-Kassem

Details

PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback