• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Gary Kemp

University of Glasgow
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    99
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    5
  •  News and Updates
    59

 More details
  • University of Glasgow
    Department of Philosophy
    Senior Lecturer
  • University of Glasgow
    Department of Philosophy
    Unknown
University of California, Santa Barbara
Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Barbara
PhD, 1993
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Language
Aesthetics
20th Century Philosophy
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Areas of Interest
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Mind
General Philosophy of Science
20th Century Philosophy
Metaphysics and Epistemology
  • All publications (99)
  •  43
    12 Modern Philosophers
    with Christopher Belshaw
    Wiley-Blackwell. 2010.
    Featuring essays from leading philosophical scholars, __12 Modern Philosophers__ explores the works, origins, and influences of twelve of the most important late 20th Century philosophers working in the analytic tradition. Draws on essays from well-known scholars, including Thomas Baldwin, Catherine Wilson, Adrian Moore and Lori Gruen Locates the authors and their oeuvre within the context of the discipline as a whole Considers how contemporary philosophy both draws from, and contributes to, the…Read more
    Featuring essays from leading philosophical scholars, __12 Modern Philosophers__ explores the works, origins, and influences of twelve of the most important late 20th Century philosophers working in the analytic tradition. Draws on essays from well-known scholars, including Thomas Baldwin, Catherine Wilson, Adrian Moore and Lori Gruen Locates the authors and their oeuvre within the context of the discipline as a whole Considers how contemporary philosophy both draws from, and contributes to, the broader intellectual and cultural milieu.
    20th Century Philosophy
  •  31
    Quine’s Criticisms of Semantics
    In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophy of Language and Linguistics: The Legacy of Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein, De Gruyter. pp. 139-160. 2014.
    W. V. O. Quine
  •  1
    Michael Dummett, Origins of Analytical Philosophy
    Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (4): 699-699. 1995.
    Michael Dummett
  •  47
    Critical notice of Alan Richardson,'Carnap's construction of the world: the Aufbau and the emergence of logical empiricism'
    Philosophical Books 40 (2): 89-98. 1999.
    Carnap: Works
  •  117
    The interpretation of crossworld predication
    Philosophical Studies 98 (3): 305-320. 2000.
    Essentialism and Quantified Modal Logic
  •  632
    Editors' Introduction
    with Frederique Janssen-Lauret
    In Frederique Janssen-Lauret & Gary Kemp (eds.), Quine and His Place in History, Palgrave. pp. 1-7. 2014.
    Editors' introduction which discusses Quine's place in the history of analytic philosophy and the content of the papers collected in this volume.
    W. V. O. Quine
  •  79
    Review of W. V. Quine, Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays; and, Quine in Dialogue (review)
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (4). 2009.
    W. V. O. Quine
  •  631
    Pushing Wittgenstein and Quine Closer Together
    Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (10). 2014.
    As against the view represented here by Peter Hacker and John Canfield, I urge that the philosophies of Quine and Wittgenstein can be reconciled. Both replace the orthodox view of language as resting on reference: Quine with the notion of linguistic disposition, Wittgenstein with the notions of grammar and forms of life. I argue that Wittgenstein's insistence, in the rule-following discussion, that at bottom these are matters of practice, of ‘what we do’, is not only compatible in a rough sort o…Read more
    As against the view represented here by Peter Hacker and John Canfield, I urge that the philosophies of Quine and Wittgenstein can be reconciled. Both replace the orthodox view of language as resting on reference: Quine with the notion of linguistic disposition, Wittgenstein with the notions of grammar and forms of life. I argue that Wittgenstein's insistence, in the rule-following discussion, that at bottom these are matters of practice, of ‘what we do’, is not only compatible in a rough sort of way with Quine's outlook, but is very close to Quine's naturalistic view of language. And I argue that the likely objections to this can on the one hand be explained away as Quine's having been interested in a very narrow slice of language in comparison with Wittgenstein, and on the other by a failure to take into account later developments in Quine’s views.
    20th Century Philosophy
  •  197
    Frege's sharpness requirement
    Philosophical Quarterly 46 (183): 168-184. 1996.
    Frege: Functions and Concepts, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback