R Paul

This book re-examines legal need in the light of contemporary philosophy, social policy analysis, medical economics and the trend towards evaluation of legal services. From this exploration a new perspective emerges - testing for non-need by comparing the consequences of absence and presence of legal representation. The tests cover empirical research from five Common Law jurisdictions on five outcomes (the cure hypothesis): plea, venue, bail, verdict and sentence. From this it is concluded that the general case for legal need is not proven. In this place as inverted need the judge is re-imported as the key variable in legal decisions. Finally the clinical analogy with legal need is discussed - legal aid as welfare or as subsidy; victim's needs and the mode of criminal justice.

With his writings on phenomenology, psychoanalysis, Marxism, ideology, and religion, Paul Ricoeur has single-handedly redefined and revitalized the hermeneutic tradition. _From Text to Action_ is an essential companion to the now classic_ The Conflict of Interpretation_s. Here, Ricoeur continues and extends his project of constructing a general theory of interpretation, positioning his work in relation to its own philosophical background: Hegel, Husserl, Gadamer, and Weber. He also responds to contemporary figures like K.O. Apel and Jürgen Habermas, connecting his own theorization of ideology to their version of ideology critique.

Celui qui entreprend l'étude du droit ne peut manquer d'être frappé par la divergence énorme qui existe entre les jurisconsultes sur la définition, le fondement ou le but du droit. Sans doute, on s'accorde à dire que l'objectif du droit est l'établissement d'un ordre social harmonieux et la solution des conflits entre les hommes. Mais dès que l'on dépasse cette proposition assez banale, des désaccords surgissent, comme il n'en existe dans aucune autre discipline intellectuelle. [...] Comment expliquer un pareil désaccord sur les notions les plus élémentaires? [...] Il nous semble nécessaire d'indiquer dès maintenant que la solution du problème peut être fournie par la philosophie moderne des " valeurs ". Le droit s'est proposé successivement plusieurs objectifs ; il a cherché à saisir l'une après l'autre plusieurs " valeurs " sociales, la sécurité juridique, la justice, le progrès social, et ce sont les phases progressives de cette conquête qui sont représentées par les diverses Ecoles. [...] Paul Roubier.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Une science est une langue bien faite, et on doit très humblement reconnaître que les termes dont les juristes se servent constamment manquent de netteté ; les mots : droit, action en justice, pouvoir, faculté, liberté sont constamment employés les uns pour les autres. Ce livre présente un grand effort fait pour y porter remède, et nous n'avons pas redouté le reproche de nous attardé à des querelles lexicales : car le danger est trop grand, dans notre science, que les conflits d'intérêts ne deviennent insolubles si on les double de querelles de mots. Paul Roubier.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Michel Foucault, during the early 1980s, devoted the bulk of his scholarly efforts to a renewed form of genealogical work on themes, venues, practices, and modes of governing the self and others. This work came to be known unfortunately as the “late Foucault”. This essay explores some of the historical elements at play during this deeply (re)formative years. The essay is organized around a prelude that introduces the problem of what mode is appropriate for giving form to thinking. It argues that Foucault engaged in a struggle to redefine the object of thinking. In doing so, he was not only led to pursue a venue in which such thinking could be practiced, but also to an increasingly articulate and acute quest for a form that would constitute a difference between what Foucault diagnosed as an impoverished modern problem space and a future in which things might be different and better.

Madison, G. B. Avant-propos.--Gadamer, H.-G. La mort comme question.--Lévinas, E. L'être et l'autre.--Dufrenne, M. L'esthétique de Paul Valéry.--Eliade, M. Orphée et l'orphisme.--Décarie, V. Vertu totale, vertu parfaite et kalokagathie dans l'Éthique à Eudème.--Strasser, S. Réflexions sur la proposition phénoménologique.--Peursen, C. van. L'existence fait-elle sens?--Edie, J. E. La pertinence actuelle de la conception husserlienne de l'idéalité du langage.--Taylor, C. Force et sens, les deux dimensions irréductibles d'une science de l'homme.--Henry, M. Phénoménologie de la conscience, phénoménologie de la vie.--Philibert, M. Marx, la machine et la manufacture.--Dumas, A. Savoir objectif, croyance projective, foi interpellée.--Maqdici, A. L'ontologie kérygmatique de Paul Ricœur, approche arabe.--Kemp, P. Le rôle du mythe et de la poésie dans l'orientation sociale.