-
50Oxford Handbook of Moral Realism (edited book)Oxford University Press. 2023.Morality seems to play a special role in human life distinct from conventional norms, like those of etiquette, or simple preferences based on subjective tastes. There are various theories of the foundations of morality, some of which treat morality as 'subjective' in an important way. 'Moral realism' is however a family of theories that take morality to have an objective factual basis, such that morality is not 'up to us' and is not 'under our control'. The contributions in this handbook explore…Read more
-
48The Virtues of Happiness: A Theory of the Good LifeOup Usa. 2014.Undeniably, life is unfair. So, why play fairly in an unfair world? The answer comes from combining the ancient Greek conception of happiness with a modern conception of self-respect. The book is about why it is bad to be bad and good to be good, and what happens in between.
-
39Why it's bad to be badIn Morality and Self-Interest, Oxford University Press. 2008.The question “Why is it bad to be bad?” might seem either tautologous or poorly formed. It may seem like a tautology because it seems logical to think that badness is necessarily bad and so it must, of course, follow that it is bad to be bad. It might seem to be malformed because it may seem like anyone who asks the question, “Why is it bad to be bad?” must fail to understand the meaning of the words they are using: generally, if something is X, it cannot fail to be X. If so, then it may seem as…Read more
-
38The Reflective Life: Living Wisely With Our Limits, by Valerie TiberiusMind 119 (473): 258-262. 2010.(No abstract is available for this citation)
-
37Partially Re‐Humanized Ethics: Comments on ButchvarovSouthern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1): 184-189. 2003.
-
35Partially Re-Humanized Ethics: Comments on ButchvarovSouthern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1): 184-189. 2003.
-
31Moral Realism And Program Explanation: A Very Short Symposium 2: Reply To MillerAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2): 343-344. 2009.Miller's reply to Nelson misses the point because it does not attend to the difference between identifying the truth conditions for a proposition and explaining why those conditions are the ones in which the proposition is true
-
28
-
22Knowing What To Do: Imagination, Virtue, and Platonism in Ethics, by Timothy Chappell: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. ix + 339, £45 (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3): 607-610. 2015.
-
21Beyond the Basics of Emotions (review)Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 3 (1): 24-30. 2021.While emotions can play positive, contributory roles in our cognition and our lives, they frequently have the opposite effect. Michael Brady’s otherwise excellent introduction to the topic of emotion is unbalanced because he does not attend to harms emotions cause. The basic problem is that emotions have a normative aspect: they can be justified or unjustified and Brady does not attend to this. An example of this is Brady’s discussion of curiosity as the emotional motivation for knowledge. More …Read more
-
16Partially Re‐Humanized Ethics: Comments on ButchvarovSouthern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1): 184-189. 2003.
-
13Opening questions, following rulesIn Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore, Oxford University Press. pp. 169. 2006.
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics |
Normativity |
Meta-Ethics |
Normative Ethics |