-
26A symposium on epistemology and education, part two: IntroductionEducational Theory 61 (5): 513-514. 2011.
-
18Justifying conceptual development claims: Response to Van HaaftenJournal of Philosophy of Education 27 (1). 1993.This paper is a response to van Haaften's attempt to build ‘a natural bridge from “is” to “ought”’ and in doing so to provide a general account of how, in developmental theory, a claim that ‘a later stage in conceptual development is somehow better or more adequate than preceding ones’ can itself be justified. The account by van Haaften violates the ‘seems justified/is justified’ distinction and embroils him in a problematic form of relativism. This paper offers an alternative account of such cl…Read more
-
26The philosopher as teacher, association for philosophy of education symposium, introductionMetaphilosophy 21 (4): 414-415. 1990.
-
32Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education?Science & Education 13 (6): 553-582. 2004.
-
Introduction: Philosophy of Education and PhilosophyIn The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, Oxford University Press. pp. 3--8. 2009.
-
26Reconceptions In Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, by Nelson Goodman and Catherine Z. Elgin (review)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3): 710-713. 1991.
-
110Argumentation, Arguing, and ArgumentsTheoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 26 (3): 279-287. 2011.ABSTRACT: While we applaud several aspects of Lilian Bermejo-Luque's novel theory of argumentation and especially welcome its epistemological dimensions, in this discussion we raise doubts about her conception of argumentation, her account of argumentative goodness, and her treatments of the notion of “giving reasons” and of justification.RESUMEN: Aunque aprobamos varios aspectos de la nueva teoría de la argumentación propuesta por Lilian Bermejo Luque y, en particular, su dimensión epistemológi…Read more
-
29Gimme That Old-Time Enlightenment Meta-NarrativeInquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 11 (4): 1-1. 1993.
-
17Philosophical Naturalism (review)Review of Metaphysics 49 (4): 938-939. 1996.David Papineau's Philosophical Naturalism offers an energetic, fast-paced trip through several familiar philosophical landscapes. He treats central issues in metaphysics, philosophy of mind, epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mathematics. The unifying theme across this broad range is Papineau's articulation and defense of a coherent naturalistic stance.
-
8El Pensamiento Crítico Como Un Ideal EducacionalLogos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura 23 (2): 272-292. 2013.El Pensamiento crítico como un ideal educacional
-
16Neither Humean Nor (Fully) Kantian Be: Reply to CuypersJournal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3): 535-547. 2005.In this paper I reply to Stefaan Cuypers’ explication and critique of my views on rationality and critical thinking (Cuypers, 2004). While Cuypers’ discussion is praiseworthy in several respects, I argue that it (1) mistakenly attributes to me a Humean view of (practical) reason, and (2) unsuccessfully argues that my position lacks the resources required to defend the basic claim that critical thinking is a fundamental educational ideal. Cuypers’ analysis raises deep issues about the motivationa…Read more
-
155Relativism, truth, and incoherenceSynthese 68 (2): 225-259. 1986.There are many contemporary sources and defenders of epistemological relativism which have not been considered thus far. I have, for example, barely touched on the voluminous literature regarding frameworks, conceptual schemes, and Wittgensteinian forms of life. Davidson's challenge to the scheme/content distinction and thereby to conceptual relativism, Rorty's acceptance of the Davidsonian argument and his use of it to defend a relativistic position, Winchian and other sociological and anthropo…Read more
-
19Knowledge and Truth54In Richard Bailey (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Philosophy of Education, Sage Publication. pp. 283. 2010.
-
18Rescher on the Justification of RationalityInformal Logic 14 (1). 1992.In his recent book Rationality, Nicholas Rescher offers a provocative attempt to justify rationality. In this paper I critically assess that attempt. After clarifying the philosophical problem at issue, I examine Rescher's effort to solve it. I argue that Rescher's justification succeeds, but that he mistakenly characterizes it as pragmatic. It succeeds only if it is understood non-pragmatically. Consequently, Rescher must give up either his justificatory argument, or his commitment to a pragmat…Read more
-
12Review of Nel Noddings, Philosophy of Education (review)Educational Studies 28 (1): 55-88. 1997.
-
247What is the question concerning the rationality of science?Philosophy of Science 52 (4): 517-537. 1985.The traditional views of science as the possessor of a special method, and as the epitome or apex of rationality, have come under severe challenges for a variety of historical, psychological, sociological, political, and philosophical reasons. As a result, many philosophers are either denying science its claim to rationality, or else casting about for a new account of its rationality. In this paper a defense of the traditional view is offered. It is argued that contemporary philosophical discuss…Read more
-
93Is 'Education' a Thick Epistemic Concept?Philosophical Papers 37 (3): 455-469. 2008.Is 'education' a thick epistemic concept? The answer depends, of course, on the viability of the 'thick/thin' distinction, as well as the degree to which education is an epistemic concept at all. I will concentrate mainly on the latter, and will argue that epistemological matters are central to education and our philosophical thinking about it; and that, insofar, education is indeed rightly thought of as an epistemic concept. In laying out education's epistemological dimensions, I hope to clarif…Read more
-
55The pragma-dialectician’s dilemma: Reply to Garssen and van LaarInformal Logic 30 (4): 457-480. 2010.Garssen and van Laar in effect concede our main criticism of the pragma-dialectical approach. The criticism is that the conclusions of arguments can be ‘P-D reasonable’ yet patently unreasonable, epistemically speaking. The concession consists in the claim that the theory “remains restricted to the investigation of standpoints in the light of particular sets of starting points” which are “up to individual disputants to create” and the admission that all the relevant terms of normative appraisal …Read more
-
81Farewell to FeyerabendInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (3). 1989.It is with some trepidation that I offer this critical review of Feyerabend's new book. I do not relish the prospect of getting involved in one of the nasty little fights Feyerabend picks with those who criticize his work. Nevertheless, Feyerabend's work cries out for critical attention. Of particular interest is the degree to which this new work deepens or enhances Feyerabend's earlier castigations of Reason. Fans of Feyerabend will be disappointed to learn that Feyerabend's philosophy is not d…Read more
-
38Open-mindedness, Critical Thinking, and Indoctrination: Homage to William HarePaideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 18 (1): 26-34. 2009.William Hare has made fundamental contributions to philosophy of education. Among the most important of these contributions is his hugely important work on open-mindedness. In this paper I explore the several relationships that exist between Hare’s favored educational ideal (open-mindedness) and my own (critical thinking). I argue that while both are of central importance, it is the latter that is the more fundamental of the two.
-
101Penelope MaddySecond Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method (review)British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4): 897-903. 2010.(No abstract is available for this citation)
-
20Epistemology, critical thinking, and critical thinking pedagogyArgumentation 3 (2): 127-140. 1989.
-
473Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education: In search of common groundScience Education 86 (6): 803-820. 2002.
Coral Gables, Florida, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Physical Science |
Areas of Interest
Metaphilosophy |
Philosophy of Religion |
Other Academic Areas |