• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Alasdair MacIntyre
(1929 - 2025)

Last affiliation: University of Notre Dame
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    265
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    141

 More details
  • University of Notre Dame
    Department of Philosophy
    Retired faculty
Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America
  • All publications (265)
  •  67
    The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy
    Philosophical Books 37 (3): 183-186. 1996.
  •  10
    Intractable moral disagreements
    In Lawrence S. Cunningham (ed.), Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics, University of Notre Dame Press. 2009.
    Moral Disagreement
  •  146
    What More Needs to Be Said? A Beginning, Although Only a Beginning, at Saying It
    Analyse & Kritik 30 (1): 261-281. 2008.
    The responses to my critics are as various as their criticisms, focusing successively on the distinctive character of modern moral disagreements, on the nature of common goods and their relationship to the virtues, on how the inequalities generated by advanced capitalist economies and by the contemporary state prevent the achievement of common goods, on issues concerning the nature of the self, on what it is that Marx’s theory enables us to understand and on how some Marxists have failed to unde…Read more
    The responses to my critics are as various as their criticisms, focusing successively on the distinctive character of modern moral disagreements, on the nature of common goods and their relationship to the virtues, on how the inequalities generated by advanced capitalist economies and by the contemporary state prevent the achievement of common goods, on issues concerning the nature of the self, on what it is that Marx’s theory enables us to understand and on how some Marxists have failed to understand, on the differences between my philosophical stances and those both of John McDowell and of the physicalists, on the nature of human rights and of productive work, on the ancient Greek polis, and on the metaphysical commitments presupposed by my theorizing.
  •  35
    Philosophy: Past Conflict and Future Direction
    Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 61 (1). 1987.
  •  140
    Comments on Frankfurt
    Synthese 53 (2). 1982.
    Alternative Possibilities
  • Tolerancja i dobra konfliktu
    Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 111-114. 2009.
  •  36
    Herbert Marcuse
    Viking Press. 1970.
    American Philosophy, Misc
  •  4
    Objectivity in Morality and Objectivity in Science
    In H. Tristram Englehardt, Jr & Daniel Callahan (eds.), Morals, Science and Sociality, Hastings Center. pp. 21-39. 1978.
    Science and Values
  •  310
    After virtue: a study in moral theory
    University of Notre Dame Press. 2007.
    This classic and controversial book examines the roots of the idea of virtue, diagnoses the reasons for its absence in modern life, and proposes a path for its recovery.
    Value Theory, MiscellaneousMoral Character
  •  130
    Symposium: Purpose and Intelligent Action
    with P. H. Nowell-Smith
    Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 34 (1). 1960.
    The Concept of IntelligenceAnti-Darwinist ApproachesDesign Arguments for Theism
  •  70
    First principles, final ends, and contemporary philosophical issues
    Marquette University Press. 1990.
    Presents MacIntyre's most explicit defense of his approach to Thomistic metaphysics. This lecture follows MacIntyre's argument in After Virtue that modern philosophy has very literally lost its way, and the problems it faces are insoluble. The difficulties are twofold, and stem from the Cartesian turn to the self in the XVith century.
    20th Century Philosophy
  •  257
    Which God Ought We to Obey and Why?
    Faith and Philosophy 3 (4): 359-371. 1986.
    Philosophy of Religion
  •  37
    Metaphysical Beliefs
    Hymns Ancient & Modern. 2012.
    During the mid-1950s, three books appeared which, while theologically unfashionable at the time, can now be seen to have pointed the way forward that theology had to take. New Essays in Philosophical Theology, edited by Antony Flew and Alasdair Maclntyre, has been available ever since, and has been in increasing demand. Religious Language, by Ian T. Ramsey, now Bishop of Durham, was out of print in England for a while, but has been reissued and is in a second new impression. Metaphysical Beliefs…Read more
    During the mid-1950s, three books appeared which, while theologically unfashionable at the time, can now be seen to have pointed the way forward that theology had to take. New Essays in Philosophical Theology, edited by Antony Flew and Alasdair Maclntyre, has been available ever since, and has been in increasing demand. Religious Language, by Ian T. Ramsey, now Bishop of Durham, was out of print in England for a while, but has been reissued and is in a second new impression. Metaphysical Beliefs, on the other hand, was never reprinted. It consists of three long essays, by Stephen Toulmin on 'Contemporary Scientific Mythology'; by Ronald Hepburn on 'Poetry and Religious Belief'; and by Alasdair Maclntyre on 'The Logical Status of Religious Belief'. When the book first appeared, The Times Literary Supplement commented: 'This volume should be widely read and discussed. It is philosophical thinking at a high level, because it faces live issues, avoids asperity towards opponents, and should provoke the right kind of controversy.' More than ten years later, the same verdict still holds true.
  • Après la vertu, coll. « Léviathan »
    with Laurent Bury
    Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 189 (1): 119-120. 1999.
  •  150
    Richard Rorty (1931 – 2007)
    Common Knowledge 14 (2): 183-192. 2008.
    Richard Rorty
  •  140
    Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative
    Cambridge University Press. 2016.
    Alasdair MacIntyre explores some central philosophical, political and moral claims of modernity and argues that a proper understanding of human goods requires a rejection of these claims. In a wide-ranging discussion, he considers how normative and evaluative judgments are to be understood, how desire and practical reasoning are to be characterized, what it is to have adequate self-knowledge, and what part narrative plays in our understanding of human lives. He asks, further, what it would be to…Read more
    Alasdair MacIntyre explores some central philosophical, political and moral claims of modernity and argues that a proper understanding of human goods requires a rejection of these claims. In a wide-ranging discussion, he considers how normative and evaluative judgments are to be understood, how desire and practical reasoning are to be characterized, what it is to have adequate self-knowledge, and what part narrative plays in our understanding of human lives. He asks, further, what it would be to understand the modern condition from a neo-Aristotelian or Thomistic perspective, and argues that Thomistic Aristotelianism, informed by Marx's insights, provides us with resources for constructing a contemporary politics and ethics which both enable and require us to act against modernity from within modernity. This rich and important book builds on and advances MacIntyre's thinking in ethics and moral philosophy, and will be of great interest to readers in both fields.
    Ethics
  •  84
    The Teaching of Ethics in the Social Sciences (review)
    Teaching Philosophy 4 (2): 170-171. 1981.
    Philosophy of Education
  • Preface
    with Antony Flew
    In New essays in philosophical theology, Macmillan. 1964.
    European PhilosophyBritish Philosophy
  •  85
    3 Regulation: A Substitute for Morality
    Hastings Center Report 10 (1): 31-33. 1980.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  1
    Dependent Rational Animals. Why Human Beings need the Virtues
    Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 191 (3): 389-390. 1999.
    Continental Philosophy
  • Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry
    Mind 100 (3): 400-403. 1991.
  • Jak mamy nauczyc sie tego, o czym poucza nas "Veritatis splendor?"
    Roczniki Filozoficzne 43 (2): 203. 1995.
  •  170
    Christian Faith and Natural Science. Karl Heim. (S.C.M. Press. Pp. 256. 21s.)The Transformation of the Scientific World View. Karl Heim. (S.C.M. Press. Pp. 262. 21s.) (review)
    Philosophy 29 (110): 264. 1954.
  •  128
    The Religious Significance of Atheism
    with D. Z. Phillips and Paul Ricoeur
    Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82): 93. 1971.
    Arguments Against TheismAtheism and AgnosticismThe Number of Gods
  •  25
    Reviews (review)
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (4): 344-345. 1968.
  •  87
    Deals and Ideals (review)
    American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (4): 629-633. 2001.
    Philosophy of Religion
  •  61
    The Meaning of Existence
    with Dom Mark Pontifex and Dom Illtyd Trethowan
    Philosophical Quarterly 4 (16): 286. 1954.
  •  70
    How to Seem Virtuous Without Actually Being So
    . 1991.
    Moral Character
  •  143
    Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists and Other Essays. Louis Althusser, Gregory Elliott, Ben Brewster, James H. Kavanagh, Thomas E. Lewis, Grahame Lock, Warren Montag
    Isis 82 (3): 603-604. 1991.
    Continental StructuralismHistory of Science
  •  21
    Book Reviews (review)
    Mind 100 (399): 415-416. 1991.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback