-
98On Having Survived the Academic Moral Philosophy of the Twentieth CenturyAmerican Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4): 591-605. 2025.
-
The Illusion of Self-SufficiencyIn Alex Voorhoeve (ed.), Conversations on ethics, Oxford University Press. 2009.
-
7Wahre Selbsterkenntnis durch Verstehen unserer selbst aus der Perspektive andererDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 44 (4): 671-684. 2014.
-
46Wahre Selbsterkenntnis durch Verstehen unserer selbst aus der Perspektive andererDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 44 (4): 671-684. 1996.
-
Relativism, Power, and PhilosophyIn The American Philosophical Association Centennial Series, . pp. 313-333. 2015.
-
Marx' „Thesen über Feuerbach” - ein Weg, der nicht beschritten wurdeDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 44 (4): 543-555. 2014.
-
The Illusion of Self-SufficiencyIn Alex Voorhoeve (ed.), Conversations on ethics, Oxford University Press. 2009.
-
The Nature of the VirtuesIn Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue Ethics, Oxford University Press. 1997.
-
9ForewordIn Adolf Reinach & John Crosby (eds.), The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law: Along with the lecture "Concerning Phenomenology", De Gruyter. 2012.
-
The Illusion of Self-SufficiencyIn Alex Voorhoeve (ed.), Conversations on ethics, Oxford University Press. 2009.
-
Traditions and VirtuesIn James Fieser & Norman Lillegard (eds.), Philosophical questions: readings and interactive guides, Oxford University Press. 2005.
-
3The Wrong Questions to Ask about War (review)Hastings Center Report 10 (6): 40-41. 2012.Book reviewed in this article: The Ethics of War. By Barrie Paskins and Michael Dockrill.
-
4
-
3Why Is the Search for the Foundations of Ethics So Frustrating?Hastings Center Report 9 (4): 16-22. 2012.
-
7Sin Returns To Sociology (review)Hastings Center Report 9 (2): 28-29. 2012.Book reviewed in this article: The Seven Deadly Sins: Society and Evil. By Stanford M. Lyman. The Seven Deadly Sins Today. By Henry Fairlie.
-
21Moral Pluralism Without Moral RelativismThe Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1 1-8. 1999.When we deny the truth of someone else’s moral beliefs and give our grounds for so doing, we make or imply judgments about the inadequacy of their reasons for belief and about the causes of their belief. And we presuppose a difference between them and us in both respects. In so doing we provide matter for a shared philosophical inquiry about the relevant types of reason and cause. It is a mark of rational disagreement on matters of serious moral import that we who so disagree should be prepared …Read more
-
27On Being a Theistic Philosopher in a Secularized CultureProceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84 23-32. 2010.
Alasdair MacIntyre
(1929 - 2025)
Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America