-
61For and Against the State: New Philosophical Readings (edited book)Rowman & Littlefield. 1996.This collection addresses the central issue of political philosophy or, in a couple of cases, issues very close to the heart of that question: Is government justified? This ancient question has never been more alive than at the present time, in the midst of continuing political and social upheaval in virtually every part of the world. Only two of the pieces collected here have been published previously. All the other contributions were, at the time of the inception of the volume, fresh from the…Read more
-
46Internal/ExternalInternational Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1): 125-132. 2009.Where does domestic policy leave off and foreign policy begin? I point out that many domestic policies have major repercussions forother countries, some of them of a kind that are conducive to violence if not outright warfare. My examples are the drug laws, which create huge incentives for foreign criminals as well as domestic ones; concerns about “global warming” which are likely to impoverish many poor countries or prevent them from advancing; and the penchant for extensive government interven…Read more
-
4That old‐time religion: Reply to HerzogCritical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (4): 573-582. 1991.
-
7McDonald and McDougal, Pride and Gain, and Justice: Comment on a Criticism of GauthierDialogue 27 (3): 503-. 1988.David Gauthier's impressive new book, Morals by Agreement, attempts to resuscitate something like Lockean natural rights on an essentially Hobbesian basis—a project eminently worth doing, if it can be done. Hubin and Lambeth offer some interesting criticisms of his project, and as they also raise some fundamental questions about the character and derivation of rights, it is important to see whether those criticisms hold up. I wish to comment on the one I think to be most crucial.
-
19A Theory of the Good and the Right (review)International Studies in Philosophy 12 (1): 107-108. 1980.
-
59
-
2Why Care about Liberty?Philosophic Exchange 38 (1). 2008.This is the age of the welfare state. The general assumption is that something is amiss if governments do not provide benefits to its people. Since these benefits are funded by coercive taxation, this implies that those who are taxed are morally required to pay for benefits for others. This paper argues that this assumption is mistaken. Like the founders of the American republic, I argue that government should protect individual liberty, not provide benefits to the needy.
-
21Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (review)Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1): 227-234. 1987.
-
2Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?Cambridge University Press. 2012.Are the political ideals of liberty and equality compatible? This question is of central and continuing importance in political philosophy, moral philosophy, and welfare economics. In this book, two distinguished philosophers take up the debate. Jan Narveson argues that a political ideal of negative liberty is incompatible with any substantive ideal of equality, while James P. Sterba argues that Narveson's own ideal of negative liberty is compatible, and in fact leads to the requirements of a su…Read more
-
23Professor Heath’s CanadaDialogue 42 (2): 363-. 2003.Professor Heath’s thesis that Canada is “The Efficient Society” has shock value. In contemplating our country, the image of efficiency is not the first one that comes to mind. But in this engagingly—indeed, breezily—written book, that is just what we are told. The claim is that we have discovered the virtues of good government, and other more hapless places such as the United States, have not. Contrary to what we might suppose, government is efficient! The idea certainly tickles the intellect, a…Read more
-
2The Right to be Old and the Right to Have Young: Some Conundrums About Aging PopulationsTulane Studies in Philosophy 31 183-217. 1982.
-
58The agreement to keep our agreements: Hume, Prichard, and SearlePhilosophical Papers 23 (2): 75-87. 1994.Does it make sense, and is it at all plausible, to view the moral obligation to keep particular promises and do what is called for by particular agreements such as contracts as being founded on a general "Social Contract" -- i.e., to give a contractarian account of promise-keeping? This paper argues that it does. Borrowing from Hume, David Lewis, Gilbert Harman, and David Gauthier, I provide a sketch of what the "social contract" is (not, e.g., either a real or a hypothetical meeting of all with…Read more
-
11Shopping‐mall liberalism: Reply to LegutkoCritical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (1): 129-134. 1991.No abstract
-
University of WaterlooDepartment of Philosophy
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Areas of Specialization
Value Theory |