• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Claude Gratton

University of Toronto, St. George Campus
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    38
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    31

 More details
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Graduate Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1995
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Applied Ethics
Normative Ethics
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
20th Century Philosophy
General Philosophy of Science
2 more
  • All publications (38)
  •  14
    Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca (2002) (review)
    Argumentation 18 (4): 489-494. 2004.
  •  45
    Precision, Consistency, Implication, and Inference
    Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 15 (1): 30-37. 2000.
  •  15
    Double dissociation of two cognitive control networks in patients with focal brain lesions
    with E. M. Nomura, R. M. Visser, A. Kayser, F. Perez, and M. D'Esposito
  •  66
    An Exorcism of an Evil Demon of Skepticism
    Critica 30 (90): 77-87. 1998.
    Cartesian Skepticism
  •  37
    Commentary on Fulkerson
  •  36
    Book Review (review)
    Argumentation 18 (3): 395-398. 2004.
  • Thinking in Education (review)
    Informal Logic 23 (1): 105-110. 2003.
    Informal Logic
  • Louis Althusser, L'Avenir dure longtemps suivi de Les faits (review)
    Philosophy in Review 14 4-4. 1994.
  •  239
    Critical Thinking and Small Group Activities
    Informal Logic 30 (4). 2010.
    I mention the benefits, challenges, and costs of using small group activities to enhance our students’ learning of critical thinking skills in our courses, and then describe ten examples of these groups. Two of these examples are not commonly reported in the literature on small groups, so I describe them in greater detail to facilitate their use in our courses
    Informal Logic
  •  166
    Circular definitions, circular explanations, and infinite regresses
    Argumentation 8 (3): 295-308. 1994.
    This paper discusses some of the ways in which circular definitions and circular explanations entail or fail to entail infinite regresses. And since not all infinite regresses are vicious, a few criteria of viciousness are examined in order to determine when the entailment of a regress refutes a circular definition or a circular explanation.
    Epistemic RegressPhilosophical Methods
  •  59
    Using Counterexamples to Estimate Degrees of Support
    Belief
  •  146
    Plantin's L'argumentation
    Informal Logic 19 (2). 1999.
    Informal Logic
  •  74
    Infinite Regress of Recurring Questions and Answers
    I examine a number of infinite regress arguments whose infinite regresses are presented or described in terms of recurring questions and answers in order to determine whether such recurring questions have any role in generating these infinite regresses, or in disqualifying the recurring answers. I argue that despite the existence of such infinite regress arguments and the suggestions of some philosophers, these recurring questions have no such roles. Some ways of handling these infinite regress …Read more
    I examine a number of infinite regress arguments whose infinite regresses are presented or described in terms of recurring questions and answers in order to determine whether such recurring questions have any role in generating these infinite regresses, or in disqualifying the recurring answers. I argue that despite the existence of such infinite regress arguments and the suggestions of some philosophers, these recurring questions have no such roles. Some ways of handling these infinite regress arguments are then proposed.
    Philosophical Methods
  •  32
    Commentary on Gough
  •  72
    Book review (review)
    Argumentation 18 (4): 489-494. 2004.
  •  235
    Thinking in Education
    Informal Logic 24 (1): 105-110. 2004.
    Informal Logic
  •  53
    Letting and making death happen, withholding and withdrawing life-support: Morally irrelevant distinctions (review)
    Journal of Medical Humanities 11 (2): 75-80. 1990.
    The author argues that there is no morally relevant distinction between letting and making death happen, and between withholding and withdrawing life-support. There is a discussion of possible adverse consequences in believing that there are moral distinctions. And then he shows that acknowledging the absence of such a distinction does not necessarily imply any endorsement of active euthanasia
  •  39
    From The Editor
    Informal Logic 20 (3). 2000.
    Informal Logic
  •  55
    Commentary on Alvarez
    Varieties of CausationMotivation and Will
  •  62
    Arguments about Arguments (review)
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (1-2): 49-51. 2004.
    Informal Logic
  •  278
    What is an Infinite Regress Argument?
    Informal Logic 18 (2). 1996.
    I describe the general structure of most infinite regress arguments; introduce some basic vocabulary; present a working hypothesis of the nature and derivation of an infinite regress; apply this working hypothesis to various infinite regress arguments to explain why they fail to entail an infinite regress; describe a common mistake in attempting to derive certain infinite regresses; and examine how infinite regresses function as a premise
    Informal Logic
  •  134
    Perelman`s Rhetorique
    Informal Logic 12 (2). 1990.
    Informal Logic
  •  79
    Jacques Pierre, Mircea Eliade : le jour et la nuit. Entre la littérature et la science, Montréal, Hurtubise HMH , 1989, 376 pages (review)
    Philosophiques 20 (1): 205-206. 1993.
  •  74
    Common pedagogical weaknesses in critical thinking textbooks and courses
    Informal Logic
  •  84
    Counterexamples and Tacit Premises
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (1): 9-22. 2000.
    I argue that there are at least two kinds of tacit premises; describe a certain type of counterexample against the validity of arguments, and then use it to identify one kind of tacit premise. I distinguish two classes of tacit premises on the grounds that they are discovered or constructed differently, they have different roles in an argument or causal explanation, and have different logical relations to each other.
    Tacit and Dispositional Belief
  •  32
    The Overall Evaluation of Arguments: How Probable/Acceptable is a Conclusion Given the Evaluation of the Truth and Support of its Reasons?
    : I explore the logic of counterexamples by possible conjunction in order to extend their use to estimate the degree of support of premises; address some problems with my proposal; discuss some ways of teaching this extended use; and argue that conditional probability fails to express the degree of support of premises. The scant literature on this topic sometimes presents the degree of support of premises P1…Pn for conclusion C in terms of conditional probability, Pr. I will argue that the degre…Read more
    : I explore the logic of counterexamples by possible conjunction in order to extend their use to estimate the degree of support of premises; address some problems with my proposal; discuss some ways of teaching this extended use; and argue that conditional probability fails to express the degree of support of premises. The scant literature on this topic sometimes presents the degree of support of premises P1…Pn for conclusion C in terms of conditional probability, Pr. I will argue that the degree of support is better expressed by the probability of the conditional statement expressing the inference, Pr; and prove that Pr is not equivalent to Pr.
    Informal Logic
  • Louis Althusser, Sur la philosophie (review)
    Philosophy in Review 15 1-1. 1995.
    20th Century Continental PhilosophyLouis Althusser
  •  23
    From The Editor
    Informal Logic 20 (2). 2000.
    Informal Logic
  •  45
    Commentary on Friemann
  • Aspects of the Logic of Infinite Regress Arguments
    Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada). 1995.
    I investigate various logical and contextual factors involved in the derivation and use of infinite regresses in infinite regress arguments. I discuss the concept of a regress; identify different kinds of infinite regresses; clarify the core structure of most infinite regress arguments; use the logic of binary relations to explain the derivation of the most common kind of infinite regress encountered in my research; explain how circular definitions and circular explanations entail infinite regre…Read more
    I investigate various logical and contextual factors involved in the derivation and use of infinite regresses in infinite regress arguments. I discuss the concept of a regress; identify different kinds of infinite regresses; clarify the core structure of most infinite regress arguments; use the logic of binary relations to explain the derivation of the most common kind of infinite regress encountered in my research; explain how circular definitions and circular explanations entail infinite regresses; discuss the rhetorical features of infinite regress arguments that are presented or analyzed in terms of recurring questions and answers; examine different conditions under which an infinite regress is used to refute a statement; identify different structures of infinite regress arguments that are presented or analyzed in terms of recurring problems and solutions
    Philosophical Methods
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback