• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Ned Block

New York University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    189
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    26
  •  News and Updates
    134

 More details
  • New York University
    Department of Philosophy
    Psychology
    Center for Neural Science
    Silver Professor
Harvard University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1972
Homepage
New York City, New York, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Perception
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Neuroscience
Philosophy of Mind
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Mind
Cognitive Sciences
Philosophy of Computing and Information
Philosophy of Biology
Philosophy of Action
1 more
  • All publications (189)
  • Review of Noë (2004) (review)
    Journal of Philosophy 102 (2005). 2005.
  •  111
    Fictionalism, Functionalism and Factor Analysis
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974 127-141. 1974.
    Scientific Fictionalism
  •  4
    Consciousness
    with Andrew W. Young
    In Vicki Bruce (ed.), Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind: Tutorial Essays in Cognition, Taylor & Francis. 1996.
    Science of Consciousness, Misc
  • Flanagan., O., Güzeldere, G
    In Ned Block, Owen Flanagan & Guven Guzeldere (eds.), The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates, Mit Press. 1997.
  •  202
    Two neural correlates of consciousness
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (2): 46-52. 2005.
    Neuroscientists continue to search for 'the' neural correlate of consciousness (NCC). In this article, I argue that a framework in which there are at least two distinct NCCs is increasingly making more sense of empirical results than one in which there is a single NCC. I outline the distinction between phenomenal NCC and access NCC, and show how they can be distinguished by experimental approaches, in particular signal- detection theory approaches. Recent findings in cognitive neuroscience provi…Read more
    Neuroscientists continue to search for 'the' neural correlate of consciousness (NCC). In this article, I argue that a framework in which there are at least two distinct NCCs is increasingly making more sense of empirical results than one in which there is a single NCC. I outline the distinction between phenomenal NCC and access NCC, and show how they can be distinguished by experimental approaches, in particular signal- detection theory approaches. Recent findings in cognitive neuroscience provide an empirical case for two different NCCs.
    Neurobiological Theories and Models of ConsciousnessConsciousness and Neuroscience, Foundational Iss…Read more
    Neurobiological Theories and Models of ConsciousnessConsciousness and Neuroscience, Foundational Issues
  • 1980
    In Ned Joel Block (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, , Vol. pp. 1. 1978.
  •  35
    Introduction: What Is Functionalism?
    In , . pp. 171-184. 2013.
    Functional Realization
  •  58
    Introduction What Is Philosophy of Psychology?
    In , . pp. 1-8. 1980.
    Philosophy of Psychology
  •  1006
    States of Mind
    Science 3384 (6696): 629. 2024.
    Review of Christof Koch, "States of mind: a neuroscientist searches for the seat of consciousness."
    Disorders and Syndromes of ConsciousnessScience of Visual ConsciousnessStates of ConsciousnessConsci…Read more
    Disorders and Syndromes of ConsciousnessScience of Visual ConsciousnessStates of ConsciousnessConsciousness and NeurosciencePhilosophy of NeurosciencePhilosophy, MiscMetaphysics and Epistemology
  •  4
    Debate on unconscious perception
    with Ian Phillips
    In Bence Nanay (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception, Routledge. 2018.
    Unconscious Perception
  •  114
    The Border Between Thinking and Seeing
    Analysis 83 (3): 539-541. 2023.
    Précis.
  •  104
    Responses to my critics
    Analysis 83 (3): 575-588. 2023.
    Ian Phillips and Chaz Firestone have written a wonderful article on the rationale for adaptation as an indicator of perception, and more generally, on the purpo.
  • The Block Panel
    with W. V. Quine, Martin Davies, Paul Horwich, and Rudolf Fara
    Philosophy International. 1994.
    W. V. O. Quine
  •  127
    Perception is iconic, perceptual working memory is discursive
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46. 2023.
    The evidence that the target article cites for language-of-thought (LoT) structure in perceptual object representations concerns perceptual working memory, not perception. Perception is iconic, not structured like an LoT. Perceptual working memory representations contain the remnants of iconic perceptual representations, often recoded, in a discursive envelope.
    Philosophy of Cognitive ScienceMemory
  •  62
    If perception is probabilistic, why does it not seem probabilistic?
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373. 2018.
  •  71
    Studies in Thought and Language (review)
    Journal of Philosophy 69 (14): 427-434. 1972.
    Languages, Misc
  •  386
    Why do mirrors reverse right/left but not up/down
    Journal of Philosophy 71 (9): 259-277. 1974.
    Reflections
  •  1130
    Let's get rid of the concept of an object file
    In Brian McLaughlin & Jonathan Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind, Second Edition, Wiley. pp. 494-516. forthcoming.
    The Role of Language in ThoughtMental Files
  •  9593
    The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
    OUP Usa. 2023.
    This book argues that there is a joint in nature between seeing and thinking, perception, and cognition. Perception is constitutively iconic, nonconceptual, and nonpropositional, whereas cognition does not have these properties constitutively. The book does not appeal to “intuitions,” as is common in philosophy, but to empirical evidence, including experiments in neuroscience and psychology. The book argues that cognition affects perception, i.e., that perception is cognitively penetrable, but t…Read more
    This book argues that there is a joint in nature between seeing and thinking, perception, and cognition. Perception is constitutively iconic, nonconceptual, and nonpropositional, whereas cognition does not have these properties constitutively. The book does not appeal to “intuitions,” as is common in philosophy, but to empirical evidence, including experiments in neuroscience and psychology. The book argues that cognition affects perception, i.e., that perception is cognitively penetrable, but that this does not impugn the joint in nature. A key part of the argument is that we perceive not only low-level properties like colors, shapes, and textures but also high-level properties such as faces and causation. Along the way, the book explains the difference between perception and perceptual memory, the differences between format and content, and whether perception is probabilistic despite our lack of awareness of probabilistic properties. The book argues for perceptual categories that are not concepts, that perception need not be singular, that perceptual attribution and perceptual discrimination are equally fundamental, and that basic features of the mind known as “core cognition” are not a third category in between perception and cognition. The chapter on consciousness leverages these results to argue against some of the most widely accepted theories of consciousness. Although only one chapter is about consciousness, much of the rest of the book repurposes work on consciousness to isolate the scientific basis of perception.
    Varieties of Representation
  •  2
    Optimal attention: reply to Sebastian Watzl
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  • Poise, dispositions and access-consciousness: reply to Daniel Stoljar
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  • Dave Chalmers on shape and color
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  • Puzzled about sensory qualities: reply to Bill Lycan
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  • Empirical science meets higher order views of consciousness: reply to Hakwan Lau and Richard Brown
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  • Arguments pro and con on Adam Pautz's external directedness principle
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  • Geoff Lee's hegemony of the third person
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  •  1
    Sydney shoemaker on transparency and the inverted spectrum
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    The Inverted Spectrum
  • Tyler Burge on perceptual adaptation
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  • Intuitions and the metaphysics of mind: reply to Joe Levine
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Philosophy of Mind
  •  1
    Fading qualia: a response to Michael Tye
    In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Mit Press. 2018.
    Qualia
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback