-
2FODOR, J., & KATZ, J. J.: "Structure of language" (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (n/a): 116. 1965.
-
2FEIGL, HERBERT and MAXWELL, GROVER: "Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science" (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (n/a): 110. 1962.
-
SCHLEGEL, RICHARD: "Time and the Physical World" (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (n/a): 254. 1962.
-
UTLER, R. J.: "Analytic philosophy" (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (n/a): 424. 1963.
-
ARTIN, R. M.: Belief, Existence, and Meaning (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (n/a): 400. 1970.
-
2Methodology and Ontology in Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific ChangeIn Kostas Gavroglu, Yorgos Goudaroulis & P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.), Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Springer. pp. 47-57. 1989.
-
How to Turn the Tractatus Wittgenstein into (Almost) Donald DavidsonIn Ernest LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell. pp. 92--100. 1986.
-
The Challenge of Scientific MaterialismIn Alan Malachowski (ed.), Richard Rorty, Routledge. pp. 1--5. 2002.
-
Philosophical Problems of Cosmology in Nouvelles tendances du réalisme: la perspective australienneRevue Internationale de Philosophie 41 (160): 112-126. 1987.
-
3This review is mainly expository. At one place, Following a suggestion of carnap's, It is suggested that advances in brain physiology might enable us to revive the notion of conventional truth
-
Laws of Nature as a Species of RegularitiesIn John Bacon, Keith Campbell & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D M Armstrong, Cambridge University Press. pp. 152-169. 1993.
-
1RepliesIn John Jamieson Carswell Smart, Philip Pettit, Richard Sylvan & Jean Norman (eds.), Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J. J. C. Smart, Blackwell. 1987.
-
3The compatibility of direct realism with the scientific account of perception; comment on mark CrooksJournal of Mind and Behavior 23 (3): 239-244. 2002.These comments are concerned to show that direct realism about perception is quite compatible with the physical and neuroscientific story. Use is made of D.M. Armstrong's account of perception as coming to believe by means of the senses. What we come to believe about is the bird on the gatepost, say. So the account is direct realist. But it is obviously compatible with the scientific story which explains how the coming to believe comes about. We can also identify beliefs with brain states
-
38Wittgenstein, following a rule, and scientific psychologyIn Edna Ullmann-Margalit (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise, Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 123--137. 1992.
-
132Utilitarianism: For and Against.Utilitarian EthicsPhilosophical Quarterly 24 (96): 279-281. 1974.
-
Metaphysischer RealismusIn Marcus Willaschek (ed.), Realismus, Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag. pp. 2143--107. 1993.
-
4Act-Utilitarianism and Rule-UtilitarianismIn Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the good life, Oxford University Press. 1997.
-
2Metaphysics, logic and theology : The existence of GodIn Antony Flew (ed.), New essays in philosophical theology, Macmillan. 1964.
-
Comments on the papersIn Charles Frederick Presley (ed.), The identity theory of mind, University of Queensland Press. pp. 91--91. 1967.
-
7Ockham’s razorIn James H. Fetzer (ed.), Principles of philosophical reasoning, Rowman & Allanheld. pp. 118--28. 1984.
