David Torrijos-Castrillejo

This article deals with the doctrine of providence in Thomas Aquinas based on the thinking of the French philosopher Christian Godin: divine providence would provide an understanding of the “totality” (totalité) that concerns not only the entire universe but also each individual. Aquinas gives an Aristotelian explanation of chance, luck and contingency from the divine perspective. Omniscience, omnipotence and divine providence, however, do not contradict the existence of either true contingency in the natural world or freedom but, on the contrary, they support them. In short, the two peculiarities of the doctrine of providence in St. Thomas here exposed are: first, that God’s will is the ultimate foundation of all contingency (and not merely the deficiency of secondary causes); second, that the divine causality cannot be reduced to any of the two groups of created causes (necessary or contingent) but it is only known to us by analogy.

The figure of Francisco de Vitoria, founder of the so-called School of Salamanca and one of the most important professors of the University of Salamanca in the 16th century, has been considered on different occasions as an admirable model of a university professor. On one side, this article describes the scientific commitment of the School of Salamanca as a sign of an important dimension of university life: research. On the other side, the main features of Vitoria as a teacher will be exposed. His teaching abilities will be taken into account, but also his capacity to involve other colleagues in a joint search for truth will be described. Finally, the renewing character of Vitoria’s Thomism in the framework of philosophy as a great ally of scientific dialogue will be considered.

This paper examines the thought of Pope Francis on the nature of the university and its mission as expressed in Veritatis gaudium and proposes a reading of Fides et ratio and Lumen fidei in its light. The starting point is the situation of the university in the liquid modernity as described by Bauman, whose reflections partly inspire Francis’ sociological analyses. According to the Pope, the university must contribute to the rooting of persons by building a true community of study and research. This requires a science free from the temptation of sophistry (a form of domination) and inspired by concern for the other: friendship is thus the context in which the rationality proper to a new humanism can develop.

The Dominican Pedro de Ledesma was educated at the University of Salamanca, where he became a professor. He is considered one of the last members of the famous School of Salamanca. This work studies his contribution to economic thought as regards tax doctrine. In Ledesma’s thought almost a century of moral reflections developed by the Salamanca professors (such as Vitoria, Azpilcueta, Soto…) crystallises, who were echoed by other Spanish authors. Ledesma recapitulates this reflection by providing his personal point of view on the subject in a historical period in which the Spanish influence had reached global dimensions.

The late Middle Ages witnessed a recapitulation of medieval reflection on beauty. Jean Gerson is an important representative of these philosophical and theological contributions, although he has been largely neglected up to this time. A first dimension of his ideas on beauty is the incorporation of beauty (pulchrum) into the number of transcendentals, i.e., the concepts “convertible” with the notion of being (ens), that is, unity, truth, and goodness (unum, verum and bonum). This article revisits Monica Calma’s study on Gerson’s theory of beauty and suggests new hypothetical sources that may have inspired this aspect of his thought. The second aspect emphasised here is Gerson’s classification of beauty, which entails some similarities to the one of Ulrich of Strasbourg, but also differs from it. Moreover, its incorporation of a division entirely devoted to artistic beauty is highly remarkable.

This article deals with the historical position of Domingo Báñez in the De Auxiliis Controversy. He was a protagonist of the beginning of the dispute and his name was used by the defenders of Luis de Molina to describe the traditional Thomist account on divine providence and free will; even today, many Thomists use the name of Báñez to designate their own position. This article tries to determine his personal opinion regarding the ontology of physical premotion without presupposing the later development of Bañecian doctrine. Most Thomists conceive it as a kind of entity inherent in the creature, but Báñez did not interpret it this way in his own account. According to him, God moves the created will so that the free human act is the first new entity in the creature, and it is produced by both God and created free will.

Unidad didáctica I Tema 1. Rasgos de la modernidad 1. 1. Características del proyecto moderno 1. 2. Contradicciones internas del proyecto moderno Tema 2. El paradigma del conocimiento científico: racionalismo, empirismo e idealismo trascendental 2. 1. Descartes 2. 2. Hume 2. 3. Kant Tema 3. El paradigma del contrato: Hobbes, Locke y Rousseau 3. 1. Hobbes 3. 2. Locke 3. 3. Rousseau Tema 4. El paradigma de los sentimientos y el determinismo: de Pascal a Kant 4. 1. Pascal 4. 2. Spinoza 4. 3. Hume 4. 4. Kant Unidad didáctica II Tema 1. El desarrollo científico y el positivismo 1. 1. El desarrollo científico del siglo XIX y la teoría de la evolución 1. 2. Comte y el positivismo Tema 2. El desarrollo del idealismo 2. 1. Fichte 2. 2. Schelling 2. 3. Hegel Tema 3. El desarrollo de las críticas a occidente 3. 1. Marx 3. 2. Nietzsche 3. 3. Freud Unidad didáctica III Tema 1. Husserl 1. 1. La intencionalidad de la conciencia 1. 2. La reducción fenomenológica Tema 2. Existencialismo 2. 1. El concepto de existencia 2. 2. Las determinaciones de la existencia Tema 3. Heidegger 3. 1. El Dasein 3. 2. Los existenciarios del Dasein 3. 3. El sentido del ser 3. 4. Dios Tema 4. La filosofía analítica 4. 1. El atomismo lógico 4. 2. El positivismo lógico 4. 3. El segundo Wittgenstein Tema 5. La hermenéutica 5. 1. Gadamer 5. 2. Ricœur Tema 6. La escuela de Frankfurt 6. 1. Primera Teoría crítica 6. 2. La dialéctica de la Ilustración 6. 3. Marxismo y psicoanálisis Tema 7. Habermas 7. 1. Polémica con el positivismo 7. 2. Teoría de la acción comunicativa 7. 3. Un cambio de paradigma

Aristotle introduced in the history of the reception of Anaxagoras the term “homoiomerous”. This word refers to substances whose parts are similar to each other and to the whole. Although Aristotle’s explanations can be puzzling, the term “homoiomerous” may explain an authentic aspect of Anaxagoras’ doctrine reflected in the fragments of his work. Perhaps one should find a specific meaning for the term “homoiomerous” in Anaxagoras, somewhat different from the one present in Aristotle. This requires a review of the sense of the two terms involved in it: “homoios” and “moira”. In other words, the following questions should be answered: what realities are named parts and to what whole do they belong? On the other hand, which similarity do they have to each another and to the whole? The author concludes that the parts are “all things”, which resemble each other and the universe as a whole because, according to Anaxagoras, they are all composed of all things.

Aristóteles introdujo en la historia de la recepción de Anaxágoras el término ‘homeómero’. Este vocablo hace referencia a las sustancias cuyas partes son similares entre sí y también se asemejan al todo. Aunque las explicaciones del Estagirita pueden dar lugar a confusión, cabría que ese término respondiera a un aspecto auténtico de la doctrina de Anaxágoras reflejada en los fragmentos de su obra. Ahora bien, haría falta, quizá, encontrar un significado específico para ‘homeómero’ en Anaxágoras, un poco distinto del que parece poseer la palabra en Aristóteles. Para ello hace falta revisar el sentido de los dos términos implicados: ‘homoios’ y ‘moira’. Es necesario averiguar qué realidades son designadas como partes y, por consiguiente, distinguir el todo respecto del cual es apreciada su parcialidad. Además, hay que atender al tipo de semejanza que guardan entre sí esas partes y a su parecido con el todo. El autor concluye que las partes son “todas las cosas”, las cuales se parecen unas a otras y a todo el universo por estar compuestas de todas las cosas, según Anaxágoras.