-
10Should (Analytic) Philosophy Leave Its History Behind? On A Recent Reappraisal of the Russell / Bradley DebateChromatikon 6 217-224. 2010.
-
21Rethinking Leibniz: Whitehead, Ward and the Idealistic LegacyProcess Studies 35 (2): 207-229. 2006.
-
24Leibniz and the English-Speaking WorldBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3): 524-528. 2010.No abstract
-
7Should (Analytic) Philosophy Leave Its History Behind? On A Recent Reappraisal of the Russell / Bradley DebateChromatikon 6 217-224. 2010.
-
51Mind-Body Problem and PanpsychismIn Michel Weber (ed.), Handbook of Whiteheadian Process Thought, De Gruyter. pp. 383-394. 2008.
-
24Il realismo assoluto di G.E. Moore e la critica di F.H. BradleyRivista di Filosofia 88 (2): 253-268. 1997.
-
Chromatikon Iii: Annuaire de la Philosophie En Procã¨s (Yearbook of Philosophy in Process)Presses Univ de Louvain. 2007.
-
The compounding of consciousnessIn Pierfrancesco Basile & Leemon B. McHenry (eds.), Consciousness, Reality and Value: Philosophical Essays in Honour of T. L. S. Sprigge, Ontos. 2007.
-
14Rethinking Leibniz: Whitehead, Ward and the Idealistic LegacyProcess Studies 35 (2): 207-229. 2006.
-
41Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein (eds): The American Philosophers (Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XXVIII)British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (4): 726-730. 2010.(2010). Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein (eds): The American Philosophers (Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XXVIII) British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 726-730
-
66Learning from Leibniz: Whitehead (and Russell) on Mind, Matter and MonadsBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6): 1128-1149. 2015.Whitehead's system may be interpreted as a majestic attempt at recasting Leibniz's theory of monads in terms of sounder ontological categories. After a brief introductory section on the sources of Whitehead's knowledge of Leibniz's philosophy, the paper explains why Whitehead turned to Leibniz for metaphysical inspiration. Attention then shifts to Whitehead's understanding of the problems involved with Leibniz's theory of monads and his alternative explanation of monadic causation. Whitehead's e…Read more
-
44William James on Ethics and FaithBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5): 1008-1011. 2011.British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 5, Page 1008-1011, September 2011
-
268It Must be True – But How Can it Be? Some Remarks on Panpsychism and Mental CompositionRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 67 93-112. 2010.Although panpsychism has had a very long history, one that goes back to the very origin of western philosophy, its force has only recently been appreciated by analytic philosophers of mind. And even if many still reject the theory as utterly absurd, others have argued that it is the only genuine form of physicalism. This paper examines the case for panpsychism and argues that there are at least goodprima faciereasons for taking it seriously. In a second step, the paper discusses the main difficu…Read more
-
Back to Whitehead? Galen Strawson and the Rediscovery of PanpsychismIn David Skrbina (ed.), Mind that Abides. Panpsychism in the new millennium, John Benjamins. 2009.
-
16Self and WorldBradley Studies 9 (2): 93-100. 2003.It may not be easy to see what Hume, Bradley and James have in common. It is usually recognised that they are empiricist, insofar as they believed that it is experience which furnishes us with all the materials for thinking. Nonetheless, there are many other philosophers which are empiricist in this sense, and Hume is commonly referred to as a ‘sceptic’, Bradley as an ‘idealist’, and only James as a ‘radical empiricist’. Hence I need to provide some justification for putting them under the same …Read more
-
49Materialist vs. Panexperientialist Physicalism: Where Do We Stand?Process Studies 39 (2): 264-284. 2010.This paper provides a brief critique of Jaegwon Kim’s evaluation of the achievements of materialist physicalism and then goes on to examine the case for panpsychism and the main objection that has been raised against it, i.e., the composition problem. The object of this examination is to lay bare the fundamental assumptions underlying both the main argument in support of the theory and the objection against it. Whitehead’s panexperientialism has a fair claim to be regarded as the most elaborate …Read more