-
15The Metaphysics of Consciousness (edited book)Cambridge University Press. 2010.What is consciousness? What is the place of consciousness in nature? These and related questions occupy a prominent place in contemporary studies in metaphysics and philosophy of mind, often involving complex interdisciplinary connections between philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, biology and cognitive neuroscience. At the same time, these questions play a fundamental role in the philosophies of great thinkers of the past such as, among others, Plotinus, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant, W…Read more
-
3Monadologie und Relationen – Whitehead, Russell und die Ablehnung der Substanz-MetaphysikIn Gianluigi Segalerba, Antonella Lang-Balestra & Holger Gutschmidt (eds.), Substantia – Sic et Non. Eine Geschichte des Substanzbegriffs von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart in Einzelbeiträgen, Ontos. pp. 445-460. 2008.
-
7Whitehead, Hume and the Phenomenology of CausationIn Michel Weber Pierfrancesco Basile (ed.), Subjectivity, Process, and Rationality, Ontos Verlag. pp. 137-158. 2006.
-
9The Last Man Standing Argument for panpsychism: A rejoinderIn Michael Blamauer (ed.), The Mental as Fundamental: New Perspectives on Panpsychism, Ontos Verlag. pp. 35-52. 2011.
-
Ch. 10. Bradley's metaphysicsIn W. J. Mander (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford University Press. 2014.
-
16Whitehead and the Pittsburgh School: Preempting the Problem of Intentionality by Lisa Landoe HedrickReview of Metaphysics 75 (2): 377-379. 2021.
-
10Whitehead's Metaphysics of Power: Reconstructing Modern PhilosophyEdinburgh University Press. 2017.At the beginning of his magnum opus, Process and Reality (1929), Whitehead lists a series of beliefs which he thinks are widely held by contemporary philosophers. They are all condemned as dangerously mistaken. What are these myths? Why are they rejected? In the works of which modern thinker did they arise? What precisely went wrong? At what stage in the development of Western thought did this happen? By tackling these questions, Pierfrancesco Basile makes it possible to grasp the main concepts …Read more
-
17British Idealism and the Concept of the Self ed. by William J. Mander and Stamatoula PanagakouJournal of the History of Philosophy 57 (3): 564-565. 2019.According to the editors of this book, “The history of philosophy as taught today is a highly selective activity. In its determination to tell a particular story, it passes over in silence large swathes of otherwise interesting philosophical work”. This claim would have been worthy of serious consideration had it been made a few decades ago—that is to say, at a time when analytic philosophy was a clearly recognizable philosophical movement. The “particular story” according to which the works of …Read more
-
The Metaphysics of Consciousness: Volume 67 (edited book)Cambridge University Press. 2010.What is consciousness? What is the place of consciousness in nature? These and related questions occupy a prominent place in contemporary studies in metaphysics and philosophy of mind, often involving complex interdisciplinary connections between philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, biology and cognitive neuroscience. At the same time, these questions play a fundamental role in the philosophies of great thinkers of the past such as, among others, Plotinus, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant, W…Read more
-
55In this Festschrift honoring the work of Timothy L. S. Sprigge, Sprigge summarizes his philosophy (a synthesis of absolute idealism, panpsychism, and utilitarianism), defends his position against criticism raised by philosophers in the preceding chapters of this volume, and offers in an addendum a proof for the existence of the Absolute, namely, a final and all-embracing Consciousness akin in many ways to Spinoza’s God. This defense of his philosophy consists mainly of responses to various poin…Read more
-
8BAYER Thora Ilin and Donald Phillip Verene (eds): Giambattista Vico: KeysBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4): 893-896. 2009.
-
66Learning from Leibniz: Whitehead (and Russell) on Mind, Matter and MonadsBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6): 1128-1149. 2015.Whitehead's system may be interpreted as a majestic attempt at recasting Leibniz's theory of monads in terms of sounder ontological categories. After a brief introductory section on the sources of Whitehead's knowledge of Leibniz's philosophy, the paper explains why Whitehead turned to Leibniz for metaphysical inspiration. Attention then shifts to Whitehead's understanding of the problems involved with Leibniz's theory of monads and his alternative explanation of monadic causation. Whitehead's e…Read more
-
44William James on Ethics and FaithBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5): 1008-1011. 2011.British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 5, Page 1008-1011, September 2011
-
270It Must be True – But How Can it Be? Some Remarks on Panpsychism and Mental CompositionRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 67 93-112. 2010.Although panpsychism has had a very long history, one that goes back to the very origin of western philosophy, its force has only recently been appreciated by analytic philosophers of mind. And even if many still reject the theory as utterly absurd, others have argued that it is the only genuine form of physicalism. This paper examines the case for panpsychism and argues that there are at least goodprima faciereasons for taking it seriously. In a second step, the paper discusses the main difficu…Read more
-
Back to Whitehead? Galen Strawson and the Rediscovery of PanpsychismIn David Skrbina (ed.), Mind that Abides. Panpsychism in the new millennium, John Benjamins. 2009.
-
16Self and WorldBradley Studies 9 (2): 93-100. 2003.It may not be easy to see what Hume, Bradley and James have in common. It is usually recognised that they are empiricist, insofar as they believed that it is experience which furnishes us with all the materials for thinking. Nonetheless, there are many other philosophers which are empiricist in this sense, and Hume is commonly referred to as a ‘sceptic’, Bradley as an ‘idealist’, and only James as a ‘radical empiricist’. Hence I need to provide some justification for putting them under the same …Read more
-
50Materialist vs. Panexperientialist Physicalism: Where Do We Stand?Process Studies 39 (2): 264-284. 2010.This paper provides a brief critique of Jaegwon Kim’s evaluation of the achievements of materialist physicalism and then goes on to examine the case for panpsychism and the main objection that has been raised against it, i.e., the composition problem. The object of this examination is to lay bare the fundamental assumptions underlying both the main argument in support of the theory and the objection against it. Whitehead’s panexperientialism has a fair claim to be regarded as the most elaborate …Read more
-
35Creativity, Philosophy, and the GoodProcess Studies 42 (1): 5-19. 2013.Whitehead and Dewey called for a deep reform of philosophy. Although they respected one another, Dewey can be read as criticizing Whitehead for his adherence to a traditional, and unfortunately conservative, way of conceiving of the discipline. This article provides an in-depth reconstruction as well as a qualified defense of Dewey’s charge.
-
24The Idealist HydraBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (5): 989-999. 2013.No abstract
-
227Russell on Spinoza’s Substance MonismMetaphysica 13 (1): 27-41. 2012.Russell’s critique of substance monism is an ideal starting point from which to understand some main concepts in Spinoza’s difficult metaphysics. This paper provides an in-depth examination of Spinoza’s proof that only one substance exists. On this basis, it rejects Russell’s interpretation of Spinoza’s theory of reality as founded upon the logical doctrine that all propositions consist of a predicate and a subject. An alternative interpretation is offered: Spinoza’s substance is not a bearer of…Read more
-
50Process and Reality in Bradley’s Metaphysics of ExperienceBradley Studies 8 (1): 83-106. 2002.Bradley believes that the metaphysician’s dream of contemplating reality sub specie aeternitatis cannot be fulfilled. The theory of thought put forward in The Principles of Logic provides him with a basis for arguing that human understanding is inadequate to the task of grasping the ultimate truth about what there is. His position is far from being a sceptical one, however, and he argues that we can rise up to an imperfect knowledge of the nature of reality. ‘I am so bold as to believe that we h…Read more
-
10Leibniz, Whitehead, and the metaphysics of causationPalgrave-Macmillan. 2009.This book introduces the reader to Whitehead’s complex and often misunderstood metaphysics by showing that it deals with questions about the nature of causation originally raised by the philosophy of Leibniz. Whitehead’s philosophy is an attempt at rehabilitating Leibniz’s theory of monads by recasting it in terms of novel ontological categories
-
50