Franck Fischbach

Cet article explore la possibilité de contrer dans la théorie et dans la pratique le mouvement qui a conduit au triomphe des thèses néolibérales, à savoir le mouvement d’abstraction de la science économique hors du domaine des sciences sociales, et les conséquences de ce mouvement : la critique du concept même de social, la promotion systématique, dans la théorie, de points de vue désocialisés et strictement individualistes et, dans la pratique, des principes de concurrence dite libre. C’est contre cela que l’on propose ici d’ouvrir la voie d’une resocialisation de l’économie.

A number of authors now invoke the opposition between political philosophy and social philosophy, whether to account for the specific nature of Marx’s relation to philosophy or to reactualize the project of a critical theory of society. What, the article asks, is the meaning of this distinction? Can it fulfill the requisite conditions that will enable philosophers to address in a pertinent manner the social and political challenges of our time? These are the questions addressed here by Catherine Colliot-Thélène, whose fear is that the distinction in question may lose sight of the crucial question of power, and by Franck Fischbach, who emphasizes the materialist orientation of an approach that seeks to address the political from the perspective of the social.

This paper explores the relationship between Adorno and Schelling. It argues that Adorno resorted to Schellingian motifs to counteract the influence of Hegelian thought. In defending this thesis, I examine the various stages in the development of Adorno’s thought, beginning with two texts from the 1930s and concluding with Negative Dialectics and ‘Skoteinos’. This allows us to see that Adorno’s concern to discover a way of thinking that is capable of doing justice to the ‘non-identical’ was present throughout his philosophical career