•  54
    What do reasons do?
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1): 95-113. 2003.
  •  88
    Two Ways of Explaining Actions
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55 25-42. 2004.
    In my Practical Reality I argued that the reasons for which we act are not to be conceived of as psychological states of ourselves, but as real states of the world. The main reason for saying this was that only thus can we make sense of the idea that it is possible to act for a good reason. The good reasons we have for doing this action rather than that one consist mainly of features of the situations in which we find ourselves; they do not consist in our believing certain things about those sit…Read more
  •  129
    In my Practical Reality I argued that the reasons for which we act are not to be conceived of as psychological states of ourselves, but as real states of the world. The main reason for saying this was that only thus can we make sense of the idea that it is possible to act for a good reason. The good reasons we have for doing this action rather than that one consist mainly of features of the situations in which we find ourselves; they do not consist in our believing certain things about those sit…Read more
  • The Theory of Motivating States
    In Practical Reality, Oxford University Press. 2000.
    Argues that cognitivism is the best form of psychologism; that is, that Humean accounts of motivation in terms of belief–desire combinations should be rejected in favour of cognitive ones that take motivating states to consist entirely of beliefs. Desire is understood as a state of being motivated, and is therefore not a state that motivates, even though motivation without desire is impossible.
  •  143
    The Role of Imaginary Cases in Ethics
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66 (1-2): 141-153. 1985.
  •  15
    Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous (edited book)
    Oxford University Press. 1998.
    This new edition of Berkeley's Three Dialogues, specially designed to be accessible to the student reader, provides a comprehensive philosophical introduction, and analysis of the text, a glossary, detailed endnotes, and a full bibliography with guidance on further reading. Published alongside Berkeley's other masterpiece, the Principles of Human Knowledge, this new edition aims to give the reader a thorough introduction to the central ideas of one of the world's greatest philosophers.
  •  54
    Jonathan Dancy; I *—The Presidential Address: Why there is really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 95
  •  21
    Two Conceptions of Moral Realism
    Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 60 (1): 167-206. 1986.
  •  119
    Two Conceptions of Moral Realism
    Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 60 (1). 1986.
  •  335
    Should we pass the buck?
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47 159-173. 2000.
    My topic is the relation between the right and the good. I introduce it by relating some aspects of the debate between various British intuitionists in the first half of the present century. In Principia Ethica G. E. Moore claimed that to be right is to be productive of the greatest good. He wrote ‘This use of “right”, as denoting what is good as a means, whether or not it be also good as an end, is indeed the use to which I shall confine the word’ . By the time he wrote his Ethics he seems to h…Read more
  •  126
    Should We Pass the Buck?
    In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), Recent work on intrinsic value, Springer. pp. 33--44. 2005.
  • Rationality, Value, and Meaning
    In Ethics without principles, Oxford University Press. 2004.
    Suggests that particularist conceptions of rationality, in general, can be applied to the philosophy of language. Semantic competence does not require that each distinct semantic unit makes the same contribution in all contexts. Distinguishes weak and strong forms of compositionalism, arguing for the former.
  •  4
    Replies
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2): 468-490. 2003.
  •  256
    Response to Mark Schroeder’s Slaves of the passions (review)
    Philosophical Studies 157 (3): 455-462. 2012.
    Response to Mark Schroeder’s Slaves of the passions Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9656-3 Authors Jonathan Dancy, The University of Reading, Reading, UK Journal Philosophical Studies Online ISSN 1573-0883 Print ISSN 0031-8116
  •  14
    Review: Replies (review)
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2). 2003.
  •  151
    Reasons, Relevance and Salience: A Response to Hookway
    Philosophical Studies 130 (1): 71-79. 2006.
    This paper responds to Christopher Hookway’s article, “Reasons for Belief, Reasoning, Virtue.”
  •  106
    Reading Parfit (edited book)
    Wiley-Blackwell. 1997.
    _ Reading Parfit _ brings together some of the most distinguished scholars in the field to discuss and critique Derek Parfit's outstanding work, _ Reasons and Persons, _
  •  34
    Review: Précis of "Practical Reality" (review)
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2). 2003.
  • Reasons for Action
    In Practical Reality, Oxford University Press. 2000.
    Introduces various distinctions: between the reasons why we should act, those for which we act, and the reasons why we act. It also distinguishes between Humeanism and anti‐Humeanism in the theory of motivation, psychologism, and anti‐psychologism in the theory of motivation, internalism, and externalism and desire‐based and value‐based theories of normative reasons.
  •  8
    Review: Discussion: On Knowing What One Is Doing (review)
    Philosophical Studies 121 (3). 2004.
  •  137
    Reasons and rationality
    In Simon Robertson (ed.), Spheres of Reason, Oxford University Press. pp. 93--112. 2009.
  •  9
    Review: Aspects of Reason I (review)
    Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211). 2003.
  • Reasons and Beliefs
    In Practical Reality, Oxford University Press. 2000.
    Argues that normative reasons, whether moral or prudential, are states of affairs rather than the agent's beliefs—a form of normative realism. It considers arguments to the contrary by H. A. Prichard, among others.