-
26Mary Parker Follett as Integrative Public PhilosopherHypatia 36 (2): 425-436. 2021.Mary Parker Follett was a feminist-pragmatist American philosopher, a social-settlement worker, a founding figure in the community centers movement, a mediator of labor disputes, and a theorist of political and social organization and management. I argue that she is a model for a certain kind of public philosopher, and I unpack the respects in which she serves as such a model. I emphasize both her virtues as a public thinker and the role played in her work by the process of integration and the c…Read more
-
26
-
18Guiding Engineering Student Teams’ Ethics Discussions with Peer AdvisingScience and Engineering Ethics 26 (3): 1743-1769. 2020.This study explores how peer advising affects student project teams’ discussions of engineering ethics. Peer ethics advisors from non-engineering disciplines are expected to provide diverse perspectives and to help engineering student teams engage and sustain ethics discussions. To investigate how peer advising helps engineering student teams’ ethics discussions, three student teams in different peer advising conditions were closely observed: without any advisor, with a single volunteer advisor,…Read more
-
15Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New WorldLexington Books. 2013.Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations bridges the gap between philosophical pragmatism and international relations, two disciplinary perspectives that together shed light on how to advance the study and conduct of foreign affairs. Authors in this collection discuss a broad range of issues, from policy relevance to peacekeeping operations, with an eye to understanding how this distinctly American philosophy, pragmatism, can improve both international relations research and foreign …Read more
-
13Reply by the Author (review)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C): 301-303. 2021.I am grateful to Joyce Havstad, Nancy McHugh, and Sarah Wieten for their thoughtful, generous, and challenging engagements with my book. It has been an honor for me to read their perspectives on my book, to learn from their reactions and concerns, and to continue the discussion. It is my hope that this dialogue will continue to push the conversation about science and values forward.
-
2Reappraising FeyerabendStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57 00-000. 2016.This volume is devoted to a reappraisal of the philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. It has four aims. The first is to reassess his already well-known work from the 1960s and 1970s in light of contemporary developments in the history and philosophy of science. The second is to explore themes in his neglected later work, including recently published and previously unavailable writings. The third is to assess the contributions that Feyerabend can make to contemporary debate, on topics such as perspectivi…Read more
-
Matthew Brown : against expertise : a lesson from Feyerabend's Science in a free society?In Karim Bschir & Jamie Shaw (eds.), Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays, Cambridge University Press. 2021.