•  1155
    Defending non-derived content
    Philosophical Psychology 18 (6): 661-669. 2005.
    In ‘‘The Myth of Original Intentionality,’’ Daniel Dennett appears to want to argue for four claims involving the familiar distinction between original (or underived) and derived intentionality.
  • Cognitive architecture
    In Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, Blackwell. 2002.
  •  101
    The Systematicity Arguments
    Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2003.
    The Systematicity Arguments is the only book-length treatment of the systematicity and productivity arguments.
  •  509
    The Bounds of Cognition
    Wiley-Blackwell. 2008.
    A critique of the hypothesis of extended cognition.
  •  461
    The autonomy of psychology in the age of neuroscience
    with Carl Gillet
    In Phyllis McKay Illari Federica Russo (ed.), Causality in the Sciences, Oxford University Press. pp. 202--223. 2011.
    Sometimes neuroscientists discover distinct realizations for a single psychological property. In considering such cases, some philosophers have maintained that scientists will abandon the single multiply realized psychological property in favor of one or more uniquely realized psychological properties. In this paper, we build on the Dimensioned theory of realization and a companion theory of multiple realization to argue that this is not the case. Whether scientists postulate unique realizati…Read more
  •  296
    Causal theories of mental content
    with Fred Adams
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2010.
    Causal theories of mental content attempt to explain how thoughts can be about things. They attempt to explain how one can think about, for example, dogs. These theories begin with the idea that there are mental representations and that thoughts are meaningful in virtue of a causal connection between a mental representation and some part of the world that is represented. In other words, the point of departure for these theories is that thoughts of dogs are about dogs because dogs cause the menta…Read more
  •  398
    An increasing number of writers (for example, Kim ((1992), (1999)), Bechtel and Mundale (1999), Keeley (2000), Bickle (2003), Polger (2004), and Shapiro ((2000), (2004))) have attacked the existence of multiple realization and wider views of the special sciences built upon it. We examine the two most important arguments against multiple realization and show that neither is successful. Furthermore, we also defend an alternative, positive view of the ontology, and methodology, of the special scien…Read more
  •  52
    Editor’s introduction
    Synthese 167 (3): 433-438. 2009.
    Introduction to the 2009 Synthese Special Issue on Philosophy and Neuroscience. The papers are: The multiplicity of experimental protocols: a challenge to reductionist and non-reductionist models of the unity of neuroscience Jacqueline A. Sullivan Making sense of mirror neurons Lawrence Shapiro Evaluating the evidence for multiple realization Thomas W. Polger Multiple realization and methodological pluralism Robert C. Richardson Neuroscience and multiple realization: a reply to Bechtel and Munda…Read more
  •  143
    Consciousness: Don't Give Up on the Brain
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 67 263-284. 2010.
    In the extended mind literature, one sometimes finds the claim that there is no neural correlate of consciousness. Instead, there is a biological or ecological correlate of consciousness. Consciousness, it is claimed, supervenes on an entire organism in action. Alva Noë is one of the leading proponents of such a view. This paper resists Noë's view. First, it challenges the evidence he offers from neuroplasticity. Second, it presses a problem with paralysis. Third, it draws attention to a challen…Read more
  •  117
    What is this cognition that is supposed to be embodied?
    Philosophical Psychology 28 (6): 755-775. 2015.
    Many cognitive scientists have recently championed the thesis that cognition is embodied. In principle, explicating this thesis should be relatively simple. There are, essentially, only two concepts involved: cognition and embodiment. After articulating what will here be meant by ‘embodiment’, this paper will draw attention to cases in which some advocates of embodied cognition apparently do not mean by ‘cognition’ what has typically been meant by ‘cognition’. Some advocates apparently mean to u…Read more
  •  112
    'X' means X: Fodor/warfield semantics (review)
    Minds and Machines 4 (2): 215-31. 1994.
    In an earlier paper, we argued that Fodorian Semantics has serious difficulties. However, we suggested possible ways that one might attempt to fix this. Ted Warfield suggests that our arguments can be deflected and he does this by making the very moves that we suggested. In our current paper, we respond to Warfield's attempts to revise and defend Fodorian Semantics against our arguments that such a semantic theory is both too strong and too weak. To get around our objections, Warfield proposes a…Read more
  •  54
    A review of Terry Horgan and John Tienson's book.
  •  102
    Fodorian semantics, pathologies, and "Block's problem"
    with Fred Adams
    Minds and Machines 3 (1): 97-104. 1993.
    In two recent books, Jerry Fodor has developed a set of sufficient conditions for an object “X” to non-naturally and non-derivatively mean X. In an earlier paper we presented three reasons for thinking Fodor's theory to be inadequate. One of these problems we have dubbed the “Pathologies Problem”. In response to queries concerning the relationship between the Pathologies Problem and what Fodor calls “Block's Problem”, we argue that, while Block's Problem does not threatenFodor's view, the Pathol…Read more
  •  245
    One trend in recent work on topic of the multiple realization of psychological properties has been an emphasis on greater sensitivity to actual science and greater clarity regarding the metaphysics of realization and multiple realization. One contribution to this trend is Bechtel and Mundale’s examination of the implications of brain mapping for multiple realization. Where Bechtel and Mundale argue that studies of brain mapping undermine claims about the multiple realization, this paper challeng…Read more
  •  104
    Introduction to “The Material Bases of Cognition”
    Minds and Machines 23 (3): 277-286. 2013.
    Special Issue: The Material Bases of Cognition Guest Editors: Fred Adams · Kenneth Aizawa Compositional Explanatory Relations and Mechanistic Reduction K.L. Theurer 287 Constitution, and Multiple Constitution, in the Sciences: Using the Neuron to Construct a Starting Framework C. Gillett 309 The Mark of the Cognitive F. Adams · R. Garrison 339 Dynamics and Cognition L.A. Shapiro 353 Causal Parity and Externalisms: Extensions in Life and Mind P. Huneman 377 Did I Do That? Brain–Computer Interfaci…Read more
  •  61
    Defending Non-Derived Content
    with Fred Adams
    Philosophical Psychology 18 (6): 661-669. 2005.
    In ‘‘The Myth of Original Intentionality,’’ Daniel Dennett appears to want to argue for four claims involving the familiar distinction between original (or underived) and derived intentionality. 1. Humans lack original intentionality. 2. Humans have derived intentionality only. 3. There is no distinction between original and derived intentionality. 4. There is no such thing as original intentionality. We argue that Dennett’s discussion fails to secure any of these conclusions for the con…Read more
  •  112
    Connectionism and artificial intelligence: History and philosophical interpretation
    Journal for Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 4 1992. 1992.
    Hubert and Stuart Dreyfus have tried to place connectionism and artificial intelligence in a broader historical and intellectual context. This history associates connectionism with neuroscience, conceptual holism, and nonrationalism, and artificial intelligence with conceptual atomism, rationalism, and formal logic. The present paper argues that the Dreyfus account of connectionism and artificial intelligence is both historically and philosophically misleading.
  •  212
    The value of cognitivism in thinking about extended cognition
    Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4): 579-603. 2010.
    This paper will defend the cognitivist view of cognition against recent challenges from Andy Clark and Richard Menary. It will also indicate the important theoretical role that cognitivism plays in understanding some of the core issues surrounding the hypothesis of extended cognition.
  •  722
    Why the mind is still in the head
    with Fred Adams
    In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, Cambridge University Press. pp. 78-95. 2009.
    Philosophical interest in situated cognition has been focused most intensely on the claim that human cognitive processes extend from the brain into the tools humans use. As we see it, this radical hypothesis is sustained by two kinds of mistakes, confusing coupling relations with constitutive relations and an inattention to the mark of the cognitive. Here we wish to draw attention to these mistakes and show just how pervasive they are. That is, for all that the radical philosophers have said, th…Read more
  •  242
    This paper argues that the biochemistry of memory consolidation provides valuable model systems for exploring the multiple realization of psychological states
  •  2911
    Defending the bounds of cognition
    In Richard Menary (ed.), The Extended Mind, Mit Press. 2010.
    That about sums up what is wrong with Clark's view.
  •  99
    Explaining systematicity
    Mind and Language 12 (2): 115-36. 1997.
    Despite the considerable attention that the systematicity argument has enjoyed, it is worthwhile examining the argument within the context of similar explanatory arguments from the history of science. This kind of analysis helps show that Connectionism, qua Connectionism, really does not have an explanation of systematicity. Second, and more surprisingly, one finds that the systematicity argument sets such a high explanatory standard that not even Classicism can explain the systematicity of thou…Read more
  •  354
    This paper has a two-fold aim. First, it reinforces a version of the "syntactic argument" given in Aizawa (1994). This argument shows that connectionist networks do not provide a means of implementing representations without rules. Horgan and Tlenson have responded to the syntactic argument in their book and in another paper (Horgan & Tlenson, 1993), but their responses do not meet the challenge posed by my formulation of the syntactic argument. My second aim is to describe a kind of cognitive a…Read more
  •  92
    Walter Pitts and “A Logical Calculus”
    with Mark Schlatter
    Synthese 162 (2): 235-250. 2008.
    Many years after the publication of “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity,” Warren McCulloch gave Walter Pitts credit for contributing his knowledge of modular mathematics to their joint project. In 1941 I presented my notions on the flow of information through ranks of neurons to Rashevsky’s seminar in the Committee on Mathematical Biology of the University of Chicago and met Walter Pitts, who then was about seventeen years old. He was working on a mathematical theory of…Read more
  •  876
    Abstract: There has recently been controversy over the existence of 'multiple realization' in addition to some confusion between different conceptions of its nature. To resolve these problems, we focus on concrete examples from the sciences to provide precise accounts of the scientific concepts of 'realization' and 'multiple realization' that have played key roles in recent debates in the philosophy of science and philosophy of psychology. We illustrate the advantages of our view over a prominen…Read more
  •  95
    Jerry Fodor (1994) thinks that content is not historically determined. In this paper we will consider Fodor's reasons.
  •  131
      Terry Horgan and John Tienson have suggested that connectionism might provide a framework within which to articulate a theory of cognition according to which there are mental representations without rules (RWR) (Horgan and Tienson 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992). In essence, RWR states that cognition involves representations in a language of thought, but that these representations are not manipulated by the sort of rules that have traditionally been posited. In the development of RWR, Horgan and Tiens…Read more