Adrian Jonathan Royston David Lawrence

Originally intended as part of a larger body of work, this treatment, using the author's Neopragmatic lens (Understanding, circumstances, context, intent) stands alone as a dense and thought provoking work. This is a first principles, interdisciplinary polemic aphorism on unethical ethics by distinguishing morals, ethics and virtues as not directly interchangeable. Moreover, the work bulldozes the foundations of ethics, and exposes them as living life by other people's standards, separate from morality. The same principles derived from Neopragmatics Illegality of Law were readily transferred to the unethical ethics, irreligious religion, and can be applied to any other system of authority.

Neopragmatics: The Right to be Understood establishes a wholly original philosophical belief system asserting that the right to be understood, through circumstances, context and intent is foundational to both thought and expression. Pragmatics was the base to try and explain the authors views, but they fell short, and while Pragmatism and Neopragmatism may also feature, Neopragmatics is more than the sum of its parts and presents a recursive, regenerative approach inspired byGorge Carlin's Seven Dirty Words from his 1972 Class Clown routine and the Tao Te Ching to communication and meaning, positioning neutrality as the arbiter of ethical judgment. The paper argues that Neopragmatics satisfies all five Grainger criteria under the Equality Act 2010, and thus qualifies as a protected philosophical belief. Rather than seeking agreement, it demands understanding, shifting responsibility onto the audience to interpret in good faith. The work critiques binary legal and moral systems, offering instead a dynamic model of liberty balanced by accountability, where language, thought, and belief are protected not in isolation, but through their mutual interrelation. This is a new tradition in philosophy, forged from lived experience and first principles. The insights from these writings led to understanding Deus Ex Machina, which will be followed up in due course.

Each paragraph was designed to fit within 280 characters. The work is dense, radical and relentless, with remarkable breadth, depth and brevity that benefits from iterative passes, in sequence and parallel, from multiple frames to experience the perceptual realignment in full. Most paragraphs are designed to be modular, networked micro-essays of thesis, antithesis and synthesis or inversions that can be rearranged and still recursively modify the meaning of the whole, while avoiding the extremes of nihilism and relativism through dynamic tension. Readers parsing slowly to engage with the non-linear, transdisciplinary substance over style may appreciate the polemic, aphorism, manifesto, meditation, metaphor, poetry and rhetoric through symbolic compression as a cognitive ratchet, silo solvent or systematic thinking tool. Not pragmatism, pragmatics or neopragmatism. Neopragmatics is an operational metaphilosophy informed by life experience, general knowledge, intuition and first principles with internal consistency, while deliberately embracing recursive logic around a metastable anti-foundation. Neopragmatics is disciplinary agnostic, exposes instability, reframes disputes, refuses final grounding and forces ambiguity to be managed. It reveals reality as an isomorphic, emergent network of intersecting, nested, relational arcs where paradox is a feature, not a bug. As with any good philosophy, The Gyroscopic Axiom, Reinventing The Wheel, Dynamic Degrees, Illogical Logic, Valueless Values, Unethical Ethics, Irreligious Religion, Illegality of Law, Voidless Void and teach you what you already know in a different light.