• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Alan Code

Stanford University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    25
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    2
  •  News and Updates
    11

 More details
  • Stanford University
    Department of Philosophy
    Associate Professor
Unknown
Department Of Philosophy
Alumnus
Stanford, California, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (25)
  •  5
    Explaining Various Forms of Living
    with Julius Moravcsik
    In Martha C. Nussbaum & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle's De Anima, Clarendon Press. pp. 129-146. 1995.
    Aristotle did not see a sharp contrast between the psychological and the physical. He viewed the physical as just the natural, and treats the psychological as part of the physical. This essay attempts to explain why this is so, and presents observations about Aristotle’s framework. It explores the relation of hylomorphism to functionalism, and argues against funtionalist interpretations of Aristotle due to the belief that Aristotle was confronting a different set of concerns and issues.
  •  6
    Critical Notice of Plato: "Protagoras," translated with notes by C. C. W. Taylor (review)
    with James C. Dybikowski
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2): 311-325. 1980.
  •  85
    Explaining Various Forms of Living
    with Julius Moravcsik
    In Martha C. Nussbaum & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle's De Anima, Oxford University Press Uk. 1995.
    Aristotle did not see a sharp contrast between the psychological and the physical. He viewed the physical as just the natural, and treats the psychological as part of the physical. This essay attempts to explain why this is so, and presents observations about Aristotle’s framework. It explores the relation of hylomorphism to functionalism, and argues against funtionalist interpretations of Aristotle due to the belief that Aristotle was confronting a different set of concerns and issues.
  •  5
    Changes, Powers and Potentialities in Aristotle
    In Naomi Reshotko & Terry Penner (eds.), Desire, identity, and existence: essays in honor of T.M. Penner, Academic Print. &. pp. 253-271. 2003.
  • Aristotle on Changing Individuals: Some Aspects of His Essentialism
    Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison. 1976.
    Essence and Essentialism, Misc
  •  2
    Aristotle's Metaphysics as a Science of Principles
    Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51 (201): 357-378. 1997.
    Aristotle
  •  156
    Vlastos on a Metaphysical Paradox
    Apeiron 26 (3/4): 85-98. 1993.
    Ancient Greek and Roman PhilosophySocrates
  •  4
    Aristotle, Searle, and the mind-body problem
    In Ernest Lepore (ed.), John Searle and His Critics, Blackwell. 1991.
    Searle's Biological NaturalismAristotle: SoulAristotle: Active/Passive Intellect
  •  65
    The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z
    Journal of Philosophy 79 (11): 716-718. 1982.
  •  5
    Metaphysics and Logic
    In Lloyd P. Gerson (ed.), Aristotle: critical assessments, Routledge. pp. 167-185. 1999.
    Areas of Mathematics
  •  2
    Reply to Michael Frede's 'Being and Becoming in Plato'
    Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 53-60. 1988.
    Plato's Works
  •  235
    Aristotle's response to Quine's objections to modal logic
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2): 159-186. 1976.
    Modal and Intensional LogicAristotle: Logic and Philosophy of Language
  •  210
    The persistence of aristotelian matter
    Philosophical Studies 29 (6): 357-367. 1976.
    Three- and Four-Dimensionalism
  •  153
    Monty Furth's Aristotle: 10 years later
    Philosophical Studies 94 (1-2): 69-80. 1999.
    Aristotle: Metaphysics
  •  132
    Reply to Geach's Russell on Denoting
    with Simon Blackburn
    Analysis 38 (4): 206-207. 1978.
    Professor geach's article criticized our earlier "analysis" paper on pages 48-50 of "on denoting." he took us to have offered an account of russell's earlier use of the expression "denoting phrase" which he regarded as inadequate. But we had not done so: we were interested solely in the denoting phrases which are perplexing russell on those pages, And we repeat our view that the problem which russell had found arises as much for frege's theory of reference as for russell's own earlier theory. Th…Read more
    Professor geach's article criticized our earlier "analysis" paper on pages 48-50 of "on denoting." he took us to have offered an account of russell's earlier use of the expression "denoting phrase" which he regarded as inadequate. But we had not done so: we were interested solely in the denoting phrases which are perplexing russell on those pages, And we repeat our view that the problem which russell had found arises as much for frege's theory of reference as for russell's own earlier theory. The extension of "denoting phrase" as used in "principles of mathematics" is irrelevant, As was geach's subsequent discussion of the problem we tried to identify.
    Bertrand RussellMoral Expressivism
  •  278
    Soul as Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology
    Philosophical Topics 15 (2): 51-59. 1987.
    Aristotle: BiologyHistory of BiologyAristotle: Soul
  •  180
    Critical notice
    with James C. Dybikowski
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2): 311-325. 1980.
    Plato: Protagoras
  •  441
    What is it to be an individual?
    Journal of Philosophy 75 (11): 647-648. 1978.
  •  13
    No Universal is a Substance
    Paideia 65-74. 1978.
    SubstanceAristotle: Substance
  •  523
    The Power of Russell's Criticism of Frege: 'On Denoting' pp. 48-50
    with Simon Blackburn
    Analysis 38 (2): 65-77. 1978.
    The paper analyzes the famous passage in "on denoting" where russell appears to be attacking frege's theory of the sense and reference of proper names. We argue that russell's attack has been misinterpreted and unjustly condemned. The strategy is to show what difficulties do genuinely face a two-Part theory, And then to show that it is quite easy to interpret russell as having perceived them.
    Bertrand RussellFrege: Descriptions
  •  211
    The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (sup1): 1-20. 1984.
    Aristotle: The Zeta ProblemAristotle: Substance
  • Gc I 5
    In Frans de Haas & Jaap Mansfeld (eds.), Aristotle's On Generation and Corruption I Book 1: Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford University Press. 2004.
  •  122
    Introduction
    with Karel Lambert
    Topoi 10 (1): 1-1. 1991.
    Value Theory
  •  105
    Potentiality in Aristotle's Science and Metaphysics
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3-4): 405-418. 2017.
    Aristotle: Metaphysics
  •  292
    Aristotle’s Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3): 341-357. 1986.
    Aristotle shares with Plato the attitude that the world, ‘the all,’ is a kosmos, a well-ordered and beautiful whole which, as such, can be rendered intelligible, or understood, by the intellect. One understands things, generally speaking, by tracing them back to their sources, origins or principles and causes or explanatory factors, and seeing in what manner they are related to these principles. We know, or understand, a thing when we grasp ‘the why’ or cause. Consequently, understanding is syst…Read more
    Aristotle shares with Plato the attitude that the world, ‘the all,’ is a kosmos, a well-ordered and beautiful whole which, as such, can be rendered intelligible, or understood, by the intellect. One understands things, generally speaking, by tracing them back to their sources, origins or principles and causes or explanatory factors, and seeing in what manner they are related to these principles. We know, or understand, a thing when we grasp ‘the why’ or cause. Consequently, understanding is systematic. Some things we understand through themselves - these are the first principles and as such are not understood by tracing them back to causes. We understand other things by systematically relating them in appropriate ways to what is known through itself. These other things are known through, or by means of, their causes and principles.
    Aristotle: Non-Contradiction
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback