Alberto I. Vargas

The aim of this paper is to show that every form of knowledge, even scientific knowledge, is linked with the personal existence that effectuates it. We offer a map of the different schools of Interdisciplinarity attending to an anthropological criterion. To this end, a map of the various schools of interdisciplinarity is offered according to an anthropological criterion, where the persistence of a partial and reductive approach to human knowledge in various modalities is generally detected. The consequence of this way of understanding knowledge is firstly the fragmentation of reality, but also of social life and above all of human existence itself. Thus, the need for a theory of interdiscipline is discovered, that not only transcends the epistemological approach, but also that of action and its ontological dimension. We propose that this expansion is achieved through a radical interdiscipline anchored in personal existence.

This articles suggests that the root of the current crisis in modern scientific innovation is mainly due to the method that science applies towards the real world. The scientific method reduces its possibilities by not considering the comprehensiveness of the human person, i.e. science is impersonal. Philosophers of science in the 20th century have identified this anthropological reductionism and further detected the limits of the scientific method. The lack of alternative solutions leads science into a cul-de-sac. The notion of crisis, recently pointed out by Leonardo Polo’s Transcendental Anthropology, allows us to detect the limit, to abandon that limit and to open knowledge to further dimensions of unrestricted novelty such as freedom or love. Here we highlight the following distinctions: firstly, the state of crisis and the critical conscience, secondly, the ‘desperate vs. puzzle-solver’ critical conscience, thirdly, the limit of science and its abandonment.

RESUMENEste artículo aborda una comprensión de la crisis de la post-modernidad a partir de la mitología griega y la filosofía de la historia. Se propone la reposición del miedo interior como un fenómeno colectivo de la sociedad contemporánea que caracteriza nuestra situación cultural y que tuvo su aparición en el origen de la modernidad especialmente a partir del pensamiento de Hobbes, Lutero y Maquiavelo. Por último se propone como alternativa de superación de la situación crítica la apertura a la trascendencia desde la antropología como método.PALABRAS CLAVEMITOLOGÍA, MIEDO INTERIOR,ANTROPOLOGÍA, TRASCENDENCIA ABSTRACTThis paper explores an understanding of the Postmodern crisis through Greek mythology and philosophy of history. A revival of the interior fear as a colective phenomenon of contemporary society that characterize our cultural situation and that appeared with the modernity origin specially from Hobbes, Luther and Machiavelli influence. Finally, a overcoming alternative is proposed from an oppeness to God through Anthropology as a method.KEY WORDSMYTHOLOGY, INTERIOR FEAR, ANTHROPOLOGY, TRASCENDENCE.