his article explores the central metaphilosophical problem of
progress in philosophy. The aim of the article is to substantiate the possibility
of a radically optimistic approach to resolving this problem without reducing
philosophy to science. The article examines the main approaches to resolving
this problem in analytic philosophy. The author concludes that progress in
philosophy requires a different evaluation criterion than progress in science. The
development of philosophy is determined not…
Read morehis article explores the central metaphilosophical problem of
progress in philosophy. The aim of the article is to substantiate the possibility
of a radically optimistic approach to resolving this problem without reducing
philosophy to science. The article examines the main approaches to resolving
this problem in analytic philosophy. The author concludes that progress in
philosophy requires a different evaluation criterion than progress in science. The
development of philosophy is determined not by consensus, but by constantly
renewed "productive disagreement", which requires constant methodological
and conceptual development. Therefore, not only is progress inherent in
philosophy, but its degree is comparable to the progress of scientific knowledge.
This article presents an original metaphilosophical concept of progress, the
significance of which may extend beyond philosophy itself. Clarifying the nature
of philosophical development has broader cultural significance, as it allows
for a clearer understanding of the mechanisms that shape culture and society
through the lens of various intellectual practices. Furthermore, it provides a
clearer understanding of the general epistemological processes of acquiring new
knowledge and the role of philosophy in them.