My primary areas of research are traditional and social epistemology, and their intersections with ethics and philosophy of mind.
I have previously worked on the epistemic status of lottery propositions, with applications to legal standards of proof and justification, and argued that justification does not aggregate. I am now developing a unified account of when belief, disbelief, and suspension of judgment are justified, applied to testimony, institutional distrust, and legal fact-finding. I am increasingly interested in wrongful convictions and the epistemology of conspiracy beliefs.