-
9Podmiot czy agent? Rozumienie podmiotowości w erze artefaktów poznawczychFilozofia i Nauka. Studia Filozoficzne I Interdyscyplinarne 2 (8): 89-115. 2020.
-
10O czym myśli Microsoft? Kontrowersje wokół grupowego podmiotu poznaniaFilozofia i Nauka 4 141-158. 2016.
-
8Fenomenologia a kognitywistyka – dwie metody analizy podmiotu poznania perspektywa współpracy i problemyFilozofia i Nauka 3 281-300. 2015.
-
11Umysł zakorzeniony czy rozszerzony? Napięcie w koncepcji poznania usytuowanegoFilozofia i Nauka 2 185-198. 2014.
-
23Group as a Distributed Subject of Knowledge: Between Radicalism and TrivialityAvant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 8 (1): 183-207. 2017.In the paper, I distinguish the bottom-up strategy and the intentional stance strategy of analyzing group intentional states, and show that the thesis of distributed group subject of knowledge could be accommodated by either of them. Moreover, I argue that when combined with virtue reliabilism the thesis satisfactorily explains the phenomenon of group knowledge. To justify my argument, in the second part of the paper, I distinguish two accounts of justification pointing to conditions of group kn…Read more
-
Gdzie przebiegają procesy poznawcze? Teza umysłu rozszerzonego i jej internalistyczna krytykaFilozofia Nauki 23 (3). 2015.
-
Błąd naturalistyczny — analiza i krytyka. Metaetyczne źródło sporu o naturalizowanie epistemologiiRocznik Filozoficzny Ignatianum 19 (2). 2013.
-
Naturalizm bez normatywności? Głos w obronie epistemologii znaturalizowanejFilozofia Nauki 2. 2008.The topic of the paper is to be the problem of normativity within naturalised epistemology. I pose a question whether naturalism can be conducted as a normative enterprise or whether it is merely descriptive as traditional epistemologists and some naturalists maintain. The article consists of two parts. The first one is an introduction to the main theses of naturalised epistemology, and the second one presents and disputes arguments against naturalised epistemology introduced in Jonathan Knowles…Read more
-
45Extended Cognitive System and Epistemic SubjectStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40 (1): 111-128. 2015.The concept of an extended cognitive system is central to contemporary studies of cognition. In the paper I analyze the place of the epistemic subject within the extended cognitive system. Is it extended as well? In answering this question I focus on the differences between the first and the second wave of arguments for the extended mind thesis. I argue that the position of Cognitive Integration represented by Richard Menary is much more intuitive and fruitful in analyses of cognition and knowle…Read more
-
37The Meaning of “Normativity” within Naturalized Epistemology. Some Consequences of Naturalizing Epistemic NormsDialogue and Universalism 18 (7-8): 149-160. 2008.The paper undertakes the problem of normativity within naturalized epistemology. The following issue is analyzed: can naturalism be developed as a normative enterprise, and if it can, what conditions it must satisfy to achieve a status of epistemology? According to “the standard condition”, in order to give a substantial account of normativity naturalism must present a theory of epistemic norms which are derived from descriptive statements about facts but which are not reduced to them. The thesi…Read more
-
Grupa jako podmiot stanów intencjonalnych – indywidualizm a obiektywizmZagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 51 (204). 2015.
Lublin, Poland