The paper delves into the multifaceted nature of satire, examining it through the lens
of traditional, semantic, rhetorical, and literary theories. By integrating phenomenological
principles from Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Cassirer's philosophy of culture and symbolic
forms, the paper explores the unique capacity of satire to expose underlying truths and challenge
societal norms. The core argument posits that satire functions phenomenologically by disrupting
habitual perceptions and inviting a …
Read moreThe paper delves into the multifaceted nature of satire, examining it through the lens
of traditional, semantic, rhetorical, and literary theories. By integrating phenomenological
principles from Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Cassirer's philosophy of culture and symbolic
forms, the paper explores the unique capacity of satire to expose underlying truths and challenge
societal norms. The core argument posits that satire functions phenomenologically by disrupting
habitual perceptions and inviting a fresh, critical perspective. It reveals the hidden structures of
power and ideology, prompting a re-evaluation of social and cultural norms. Through its use of
irony, exaggeration, and ridicule, satire exposes the absurd and the unjust, thereby fostering a
deeper understanding of human experience. Finally, this paper proposes that satire can be
considered a form of philosophical inquiry. By employing a phenomenological approach, satire
offers a novel way of thinking about the world, encouraging critical reflection and challenging
conventional wisdom.
Keywords: Satire, Phenomenology, Philosophy, Symbolic forms, Philosophy of culture