• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Cameron Brewer

Central Connecticut State University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    15
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
  • Central Connecticut State University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
New Britain, Connecticut, United States of America
  • All publications (15)
  •  33
    Proof Golf: A Logic Game
    Teaching Philosophy 45 (3): 279-297. 2022.
    Here I describe a game that I use in my logic classes once we begin derivations. The game can help improve class dynamics, help struggling students recognizes they are not alone, open lines of communication between students, and help students of all levels prepare for exams. The game can provide struggling students with more practice with the fundamental rules of a logical system while also challenging students who excel at derivations. If students are struggling with particular rules or strateg…Read more
    Here I describe a game that I use in my logic classes once we begin derivations. The game can help improve class dynamics, help struggling students recognizes they are not alone, open lines of communication between students, and help students of all levels prepare for exams. The game can provide struggling students with more practice with the fundamental rules of a logical system while also challenging students who excel at derivations. If students are struggling with particular rules or strategies in the system, the game can be tailored to address them. I explain how the game has evolved since I started using it, highlighting the pedagogical benefits of the changes I have made, and (in the appendix) I provide examples of the handouts I distribute and a “checklist” to use before, during, and after the game.
    Philosophy of Education
  •  4
    Et Lander ES. 2000. The common PPARgamma Prol2Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet Sep; 26 (l): 76-80. American Thoracic Society. 1987. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis (review)
    with D. Altshuler, J. N. Hirschhom, M. Klannemark, C. M. Lindgren, M. C. Vohl, J. Nemesh, C. R. Lane, S. F. Schaf&er, and S. Bolk
    In Alan F. Blackwell & David MacKay (eds.), Power, Cambridge University Press. pp. 300-302. 2005.
    Biomedical EthicsApplied Ethics, Miscellaneous
  • Obtaining Support for Eradication Programs Using a Common Ethical Language
    International Journal of Technoethics 9 (2): 15-25. 2018.
  • The Problem of Time’s Passage: Using Historical Arguments to Inform the Debate
    International Journal of Technoethics 10 (1): 24-36. 2019.
  • The Narrative Coherence Standard and the Dangers of Excessive Paternalism
    American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (1): 43-45. 2020.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  138
    A Paradoxical Ethical Framework for Unpredictable Drug Shortages
    with Rebecca Bamford, Bayly Bucknell, Heather DeGrote, Loren Fabry, Madeleine E. M. Hammerlund, and Bryan M. Weisbrod
    American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1): 16-18. 2012.
    Drugs
  •  124
    Weighing the Ethical Considerations of Autonomy and Efficacy With Respect to Mandatory Warning Labels
    with George N. Himes
    American Journal of Bioethics 15 (3): 14-15. 2015.
    Biomedical EthicsAutonomy and Moral PsychologyAutonomy in Applied Ethics
  •  107
    Regulating Methylphenidate: Enhancing Cognition and Social Inequality
    with Heather DeGrote
    American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7): 47-49. 2013.
    No abstract.
    Cognitive Enhancement
  •  48
    Reassessing the Ethical Importance of Efficacy and Autonomy in Optogenetics Trials
    with Evan Nicolai
    American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (3): 14-16. 2014.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  73
    Justifying Tomorrow's ESCROs
    with Heather DeGrote
    American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1): 65-66. 2013.
    No abstract.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  50
    Inherently Problematic
    with Evan Nicolai
    American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (1): 43-44. 2014.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  113
    Consistency in the Structure of Global Health Research Consortia
    with Idelys Amador
    American Journal of Bioethics 16 (10): 52-54. 2016.
    Global Health
  •  66
    The Metaphysical Assumptions Required for Political Autonomy
    with Jessica Morgan Gascoigne
    American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (4): 67-69. 2013.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  103
    Proof Golf in advance
    Teaching Philosophy. 2022.
    Here I describe a game that I use in my logic classes once we begin derivations. The game can help improve class dynamics, help struggling students recognizes they are not alone, open lines of communication between students, and help students of all levels prepare for exams. The game can provide struggling students with more practice with the fundamental rules of a logical system while also challenging students who excel at derivations. If students are struggling with particular rules or strateg…Read more
    Here I describe a game that I use in my logic classes once we begin derivations. The game can help improve class dynamics, help struggling students recognizes they are not alone, open lines of communication between students, and help students of all levels prepare for exams. The game can provide struggling students with more practice with the fundamental rules of a logical system while also challenging students who excel at derivations. If students are struggling with particular rules or strategies in the system, the game can be tailored to address them. I explain how the game has evolved since I started using it, highlighting the pedagogical benefits of the changes I have made, and (in the appendix) I provide examples of the handouts I distribute and a “checklist” to use before, during, and after the game.
    Philosophy of Education
  •  63
    Guilty or Not Guilty
    Teaching Philosophy 47 (4): 469-482. 2024.
    Here I describe an exercise that engages students and helps to introduce difficult concepts. The exercise can be used in a variety of courses, it can be tailored to help introduce future course concepts or readings, and it can be used in any level course; it engages both students with strong backgrounds in philosophy and students new to the discipline. The exercise can be used in courses covering ethics, social justice, philosophy of law, criminology, or epistemology. This paper explains the exe…Read more
    Here I describe an exercise that engages students and helps to introduce difficult concepts. The exercise can be used in a variety of courses, it can be tailored to help introduce future course concepts or readings, and it can be used in any level course; it engages both students with strong backgrounds in philosophy and students new to the discipline. The exercise can be used in courses covering ethics, social justice, philosophy of law, criminology, or epistemology. This paper explains the exercise and highlights some ways the exercise can be modified.
    Philosophy of Education
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback