• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Chiara Mascarello

Università degli Studi di Padova
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    1
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • Università degli Studi di Padova
    Department of Philosophy
    Graduate student
  • All publications (1)
  •  28
    Beyond the attention economy, towards an ecology of attending. A manifesto
    with Gunter Bombaerts, Tom Hannes, Martin Adam, Alessandra Aloisi, Joel Anderson, P. Sven Arvidson, Lawrence Berger, Stefano Davide Bettera, Enrico Campo, Laura Candiotto, Silvia Caprioglio Panizza, Anna Ciaunica, Yves Citton, Diego D.´Angelo, Matthew J. Dennis, Natalie Depraz, Peter Doran, Wolfgang Drechsler, William Edelglass, Iris Eisenberger, Mark Fortney, Beverley Foulks McGuire, Antony Fredriksson, Peter D. Hershock, Soraj Hongladarom, Wijnand IJsselsteijn, Beth Jacobs, Gabor Karsai, Steven Laureys, Thomas Taro Lennerfors, Jeanne Lim, Chien-Te Lin, William Lamson, Mark Losoncz, David Loy, Lavinia Marin, Bence Peter Marosan, David L. McMahan, Jin Y. Park, Nina Petek, Anna Puzio, Katrien Schaubroeck, Shobhit Shakya, Juewei Shi, Elizaveta Solomonova, Francesco Tormen, Jitendra Uttam, Marieke van Vugt, Sebastjan Vörös, Maren Wehrle, Galit Wellner, Jason M. Wirth, Olaf Witkowski, Apiradee Wongkitrungrueng, Dale S. Wright, Hin Sing Yuen, and Yutong Zheng
    AI and Society 41 (1): 477-492. 2026.
    We endorse policymakers’ efforts to address the negative consequences of the attention economy’s technology but add that these approaches are often limited in their criticism of the systemic context of human attention. Starting from Buddhist philosophy, we advocate a broader approach: an ‘ecology of attending’ that centers on conceptualizing, designing, and using attention (1) in an embedded way and (2) focused on the alleviating of suffering. With ‘embedded’ we mean that attention is not a neut…Read more
    We endorse policymakers’ efforts to address the negative consequences of the attention economy’s technology but add that these approaches are often limited in their criticism of the systemic context of human attention. Starting from Buddhist philosophy, we advocate a broader approach: an ‘ecology of attending’ that centers on conceptualizing, designing, and using attention (1) in an embedded way and (2) focused on the alleviating of suffering. With ‘embedded’ we mean that attention is not a neutral, isolated mechanism but a meaning-engendering part of an ‘ecology’ of bodily, sociotechnical and moral frameworks. With ‘focused on the alleviation of suffering’ we mean that we explicitly move away from the (often implicit) conception of attention as a tool for gratifying desires. We analyze existing inquiries in these directions and urge them to be intensified and integrated. As to the design and function of our technological environment, we propose three questions for further research: How can technology help to acknowledge us as ‘ecological’ beings, rather than as self-sufficient individuals? How can technology help to raise awareness of our moral framework? And how can technology increase the conditions for ‘attending’ to the alleviation of suffering, by substituting our covert self-driven moral framework with an ecologically attending one? We believe in the urgency of transforming the inhumane attention economy sociotechnical system into a humane ecology of attending, and in our ability to contribute to it.
    Philosophy of Artificial IntelligenceAttention and Value TheoryAttention, MiscComputer EthicsSocial …Read more
    Philosophy of Artificial IntelligenceAttention and Value TheoryAttention, MiscComputer EthicsSocial Media
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback