-
Response to Patrick LeeIn Christopher Tollefsen (ed.), Artificial Nutrition and Hydration: The New Catholic Debate, Springer Press. pp. 5--189. 2007.
-
16Review of Holger Zaborowski (ed.), Natural Moral Law in Contemporary Society (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (12). 2010.
-
The Morality of Tube Feeding PVS Patients: A Critique of the View of Kevin O'Rourke, OPIn Christopher Tollefsen (ed.), Artificial Nutrition and Hydration: The New Catholic Debate, Springer Press. pp. 193. 2007.
-
27Intending Damage to Basic GoodsChristian Bioethics 14 (3): 272-282. 2008.Richard McCormick justified his move to proportionalism in part because of the perceived inadequacy of the Grisez-Finnis approach to morality to answer the following question: “What is to count for turning against a basic good, and why?” In this paper, I provide the beginnings of an account of what it means to intend damage to a good; I then show that the account is readily exportable to judgments regarding killing and lying defended by Grisez and others. I then indicate that the account comport…Read more
-
Response to" Advance Directives and Voluntary Slavery"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 358-358. 1999.
-
49Incarnate Reason and the Embryo: A Response to DabrockChristian Bioethics 16 (2): 177-186. 2010.“Incarnate reason” names, in Peter Dabrock's essay, both the task of utilizing natural reason in ethical and political discourse, and an answer to the ontological question about human persons, “What are we?” In this essay, I investigate the significance of this construal for questions about the metaphysical, moral, and political status of the human embryo
-
20Believing by faith: An essay in the epistemology and ethics of religious belief – John BishopPhilosophical Quarterly 58 (233): 758-762. 2008.No Abstract
Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America