Christoph Luetge

This paper extends previous attempts at understanding the nature of organizational integrity and its increasingly important role for companies which, after all, bear a moral and societal responsibility. Interpretations of organizational integrity in business ethics literature incorporate aspects ranging from the behavior of managers and employees to corporate structures and incentive systems. We argue that virtue ethics builds an indispensable framework for understanding the origin of the concept of integrity and transfer these findings to an organizational level. Hence, we first define organizational integrity, and second operationalize it in a closed three‐step process, consisting of morally sound corporate commitments, their transparent institutionalization within the company, and their implementation into actions. We consider the main goal of organizational integrity to be of a preventative investment nature. Organizational integrity is a company investment that translates into avoiding fines for potential violations of the law or ethical missteps, as well as an investment in the company’s reputation. In turn, organizational integrity can protect a company from disruptions that can threaten its existence. Defining and operationalizing the concept of organizational integrity provides the foundation for future scientific research and the basis for developing practical guidance for organizations and managers.

Business ethics as a discipline has been evolving rapidly, and indeed needs to evolve constantly. This evolution is mandated more urgently than ever before as we plunge headlong, and with increasing velocity, into the era of automation, artificial intelligence and digitization. Ethical codes and guidelines are needed for educators, scientists, industries, law and policy makers, as well as for the general public engaged with emerging technologies not only to ensure a smooth transition into the autonomous and digital age, but also to ensure that in the process, we do not unknowingly disengage from basic human rights, values and responsibilities. Traditional, time tested and universally accepted principles of (business) ethics, including principles of integrity, responsibility and sustainability must, therefore, not be abandoned, but rather permitted to evolve to address the unique issues that emerging technologies present to humankind. The envisaged volume brings together contributions in the field of business ethics from a diversity of perspectives and disciplines."--Cover page 4.

In den letzten Jahrzehnten haben sich die technischen Möglichkeiten im Bereich des autonomen Fahrens so stark erweitert, dass in naher Zukunft mit einer Einführung vollkommen autonomer Fahrzeuge zu rechnen ist. Aufgrund der steigenden Präsenz autonomer und vernetzter Fahrsysteme im Straßenverkehr, was sich nicht nur den Nutzerkreis sondern auch auf die Allgemeinheit auswirken wird, ist eine Auseinandersetzung mit den ethischen und rechtlichen Herausforderungen dieser Technologie dringend erforderlich. Der ethisch relevante Unterschied im Gegensatz zum herkömmlichen Fahren ist dabei hauptsächlich die Übernahme menschlicher Entscheidungen durch Computerprogramme, was grundsätzlich neuartige Fragestellungen aufwirft. Inwieweit können menschliche Entscheidungen auf Maschinen übertragen werden? Die Ethik darf sich dabei nicht auf Ex-post-Betrachtung beschränken, sondern befindet sich in der Verantwortung den Prozess zu steuern und in die richtigen Bahnen zu lenken. Eine Beschränkung der Ethik auf eine reine Technikkritik ist aus unserer Sicht nicht hilfreich, da sie die Möglichkeiten der Ethik unterschätzt auf Entscheidungsfindungen und Gesetzgebungsprozesse Einfluss zu nehmen. Im Fokus unserer Betrachtungen stehen dabei eine wirtschaftsethische Reflexion der Richtlinien der Ethikkommission des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr und Digitale Infrastruktur, die ein positives Beispiel für die Zusammenarbeit aus Wirtschaft, Ethik und Technik darstellen. Der Umgang mit ethischen Dilemmasituationen, die Frage nach der rechtlichen Haftung und die Abwägung von Verkehrssicherheit mit Datenschutz stehen dabei im Zentrum unserer Auseinandersetzung. Zentrale Fragen sind dabei: Ist es ethisch gerechtfertigt in kritischen Situationen Menschenleben abzuwägen? Können Entscheidungen über Leben und Tod von Programmen übernommen werden oder müssen Entscheidungen dieser Art grundsätzlich von Menschen getroffen werden? Dürfen autonome Fahrzeuge Fahrerprofile auswerten, um die allgemeine Fahrsicherheit zu erhöhen und Unfälle zu vermeiden? Haftet bei Unfällen der Fahrzeughalter oder der Hersteller? Eine Betrachtung dieser Fragen zeigt, dass es sich bei den Ethikrichtlinien des autonomen Fahrens nicht nur um spezifische Fragestellungen in Bezug auf das autonome Fahren handelt, sondern auch um Abwägungsentscheidungen, die sich auf die Digitalisierung als solche beziehen. Das autonome Fahren stellt somit einen Präzedenzfall für die ethische Bewertung mit künstlicher Intelligenz und der Abwägung von Sicherheit und Freiheit dar. Die Auseinandersetzung mit dem technischen Hintergrund und den technischen Möglichkeiten nimmt daher einen wesentlichen Teil unserer Betrachtungen ein.

This article reports the findings of AI4People, a year-long initiative designed to lay the foundations for a “Good AI Society”. We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations – to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI – which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society.

English summary: The scholarly and the public discussions about the relationship between business and ethics are dominated by numerous illusions, some of which are that ethics can be seen as restraint, that morality can survive against incentives on a sustained basis, competition must be subdued, a society needs common values, our social systems can continue to exist as they have up to now, and several others as well. Christoph Lutge debunks these illusions and shows possible alternatives for realistic business ethics under modern conditions. The essays in this volume range from basic issues in ethics to application problems in business ethics and ethical problems with the internet. German description: Sowohl die wissenschaftliche als auch die offentliche Diskussion uber die Beziehungen zwischen Wirtschaft und Ethik werden von zahlreichen Illusionen beherrscht: Ethik sei als Massigung zu verstehen, Moral konne sich dauerhaft gegen Anreize behaupten, der Wettbewerb musse gezahmt werden, eine Gesellschaft benotige gemeinsame Werte, unsere sozialen Systeme konnten so wie bisher weiterbestehen und einige andere mehr.Christoph Lutge wendet sich gegen solche Illusionen und zeigt Moglichkeiten einer realistischen Wirtschaftsethik unter modernen Bedingungen auf. Die hier vorliegenden Beitrage spannen den Bogen von Grundlagenfragen der Ethik uber Anwendungsprobleme der Wirtschaftsethik bis hin zu ethischen Problemen des Internets.

Our project “Idea of Justice in Literature/ Die Idee der Gerechtigkeit in der Literatur” was firstly proposed by the chief editor, Shing-I LIU from Taiwan, and planed as an international dialogue joined by the co-editors, Aurelio de PRADA from Spain, Christoph LUETGE from Germany, and Hiroshi KABASHIMA from Japan. For this international collaboration, we organized five sessions in two days in English and German, on Monday, 27 July and Thursday, 30 July, 2015, in the form of a Special Workshop at the “XXVII World Congress of the International Society for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR)” held at the Georgetown Law School in Washington D.C., the United States of America. In the sessions, we, the organizers, enjoyed so much our intellectual exchange with the excellent presenters and participants of all ages from all over the world who were engaged in the issue of “Justice in Literature”, as it is now to trace in this editorial work on hand.

The idea of the honest businessman is a very old one in the European tradition. Its roots go back to medieval Northern Europe and Italy. This idea has also been taken up in literature: prominent writers have included depictions, analysis and criticism of the honest businessman in their works, such as Thomas Mann („Buddenbrooks“, “Joseph the Provider”), Goethe (“Wilhelm Meister”) and others. Some of these depictions are presented, along with a discussion of the concept’s relevance for today’s globalized economy.

One of the most pressing issues in political and economic matters in the contemporary world is the question of how to address Diversity in the manifold ways and contexts in which the concept is being applied today. In particular, highly developed countries such as the United States and Germany are struggling with how to approach Diversity in accordance with principles of Justice and democracy without having to risk the Productivity of corporations, businesses, and other enterprises. As a matter of crucial salience, Diversity speaks to academic, economic, political, and many other social actors on different levels. Accordingly, the particular structure of this collection of articles inspired by the 2016 academic conference on “Diversity in Culture, Institutions, and Business” intends to provide a platform for an exchange of ideas and knowledge between practitioners, scholars, entrepreneurs, politicians, and social activists involved in the praxis of Diversity.

Purpose The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the Global South brings tremendous potential for both good and harm. This paper aims to highlight the guiding ethical principles and normative frameworks for the ethical use of AI in the lens of the traditional Ga (a tribe in Ghana) philosophy and add to the academic literature and research on AI and ethics within the African context. Design/methodology/approach Literature overview on the African philosophy of Ga tradition as applied to AI and application of it to the AI4people ethical framework for a good AI society. Findings Existing principles in AI are based on and mostly influenced by western principles, which may give rise to biases in AI outcomes and design implications in Africa. The research finds a high degree of overlap in the AI4People ethical framework for a good AI society and the Ga philosophy. Research limitations/implications There are a few existing literatures on AI ethics in Africa and on Ga philosophy. Originality/value This research offers valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse of Africa’s adoption of AI and widens the debate on AI and ethics beyond the western ethical approaches.

Self-driving vehicles (SDVs) will need to make decisions that carry ethical dimensions and are of normative significance. For example, by choosing a specific trajectory, they determine how risks are distributed among traffic participants. Accordingly, policymakers, standardization organizations and scholars have conceptualized what (shall) constitute(s) ethical decision-making for SDVs. Eventually, these conceptualizations must be converted into specific system requirements to ensure proper technical implementation. Therefore, this article aims to translate critical requirements recently formulated in scholarly work, existing standards, regulatory drafts and guidelines into an explicit five-step ethical decision model for SDVs during hazardous situations. This model states a precise sequence of steps, indicates the guiding ethical principles that inform each step and points out a list of terms that demand further investigation and technical specification. By integrating ethical, legal and engineering considerations, we aim to contribute to the scholarly debate on computational ethics (particularly in autonomous driving) while offering practitioners in the automotive sector a decision-making process for SDVs that is technically viable, legally permissible, ethically grounded and adaptable to societal values. In the future, assessing the actual impact, effectiveness and admissibility of implementing the here sketched theories, terms and the overall decision process requires an empirical evaluation and testing of the overall decision-making model.

Self-driving vehicles will need to make decisions that carry ethical dimensions and manufacturers have (the responsibility) to pre-determine this underlying, deliberate decision-making process. With the rise of self-driving vehicles, scholars have simultaneously started investigating what ethical theories should guide machine behavior, but have not concluded as to which theory should be preferred and adopted. We aim to address this matter by providing a holistic and analytical review of the autonomous driving ethics literature. Based on this review, we summarize the social, moral/legal, and functional advantages and disadvantages of applying particular (traditional) ethical theories to the decision-making of self-driving vehicles. Furthermore, we derive an integrated model that shows how each identified ethical theory could be technically implemented and guide the decision-making of self-driving vehicles. Overall, this article aims to set the groundwork for reflected, successful integration of ethical behavior within self-driving vehicles and deduce an updated research agenda.

This book examines the theoretical foundations of order ethics and discusses business ethics problems from an order ethics perspective. Order ethics focuses on the social order and the institutional environment in which individuals interact. It is a well-established paradigm in European business ethics. The book contains articles written by leading experts in the field and provides both a concise introduction to order ethics and short summary articles homing in on specific aspects of the order-ethical paradigm. It presents contributions describing fundamental concepts, historical roots, and the economic, social, and philosophical background of the theory. The second part of the handbook focuses on the theory's application in business, society, and politics, casting new light on an array of topics that loom large in contemporary ethical discourse.​

Organizational integrity is a key concept with and through which a company can assume its responsibility for ethical and societal issues. It is a basic premise for sustainable corporate success, as ethical risks ultimately become economic risks for a company. Recent research shows the potential of integrity‐based governance models to reduce corporate risks and to improve business performance. However, companies are not yet able to assess nor evaluate their level of organizational integrity in a sound and systematic way. We aim to develop a theoretical model as a basis for the measurement of organizational integrity by conceptualizing the construct and sizing the theoretical model's scope. We suggest that the theoretical model follows a holistic approach and involves three types of dimensions: prerequisite dimensions, independent dimensions, and dependent dimensions. The organizational integrity triad—consisting of active commitments to self‐imposed norms and principles, their transparent institutionalization into corporate processes and structures, and their implementation into action—plays a key role in this context.

Those who invoke the notion of moral responsibility in ethical discourse seem to be faced with a dilemma. Apparently, they either have to violate the “control principle” which says that nobody can be held responsible for what is beyond one's control. Or they have to concede that in many cases there is a “responsibility void” which means that nobody is responsible. The first option seems unjustifiable. The second renders the concept of moral responsibility useless. This dilemma may be taken to suggest that thinking about moral issues in terms of responsibility is an unproductive way of doing ethics. In our paper we offer a solution which, we hope, can rehabilitate responsibility as a moral concept. It combines order ethics (which is a kind of ethics that primarily focuses on the institutional structure of society) with a recently developed account of group agency

Karl Popper hat eine Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie, eine Philosophie der Naturwissenschaften, eine Sozialphilosophie, eine Philosophie des Geistes und sogar Beiträge zur Ästhetik geliefert. Lediglich eine Ethik fehlt, was bei Popper, der sich immer als Philosoph der Aufklärung bezeichnete, doch etwas erstaunt. Ich werde versuchen, Elemente einer solchen Ethik zu rekonstruieren. Karl Poppers Beiträge zur Ethik sind relativ wenig bekannt. Dies dürfte vor allem daran liegen, dass sich keine seiner Arbeiten ausschließlich mit Ethik beschäftigt. Stattdessen findet man Bemerkungen zu diesem Thema verstreut in ganz verschiedenen Werken, vor allem in der Offenen Gesellschaft. Da Popper keine systematische Darstellung seiner Ansichten zur Ethik geliefert hat, soll dieser Artikel dazu beitragen, diese Lücke zu schließen.

This open access book tackles the pressing problem of integrating concerns related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) ethics into higher education curriculums aimed at future AI developers in Africa and beyond. For doing so, it analyzes the present and future states of AI ethics education in local computer science and engineering programs. The authors share relevant best practices and use cases for teaching, develop answers to ongoing organizational challenges, and reflect on the practical implications of different theoretical approaches to AI ethics. The book is of great interest to faculty members, researchers, and students in the fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, mathematics, computer engineering, and related areas, as well as higher education administration.

This article discusses the question whether modern societies require some kind of a social glue in order to remain stable. This social glue (termed the ‘moral surplus’) is regarded as a moral capacity or capability which goes beyond the individual quest for advantages and benefits. Four positions in contemporary social philosophy which postulate a moral surplus are discussed and criticized: J. Habermas, J. Rawls, D. Gauthier and K. Binmore. The conception of order ethics is outlined as an alternative view which abandons the idea of a moral surplus.

This paper extends previous attempts at understanding the nature of organizational integrity and its increasingly important role for companies which, after all, bear a moral and societal responsibility. Interpretations of organizational integrity in business ethics literature incorporate aspects ranging from the behavior of managers and employees to corporate structures and incentive systems. We argue that virtue ethics builds an indispensable framework for understanding the origin of the concept of integrity and transfer these findings to an organizational level. Hence, we first define organizational integrity, and second operationalize it in a closed three-step process, consisting of morally sound corporate commitments, their transparent institutionalization within the company, and their implementation into actions. We consider the main goal of organizational integrity to be of a preventative investment nature. Organizational integrity is a company investment that translates into avoiding fines for potential violations of the law or ethical missteps, as well as an investment in the company’s reputation. In turn, organizational integrity can protect a company from disruptions that can threaten its existence. Defining and operationalizing the concept of organizational integrity provides the foundation for future scientific research and the basis for developing practical guidance for organizations and managers.

The German Act on Autonomous Driving constitutes the first national framework on level four autonomous vehicles and has received attention from policy makers, AI ethics scholars and legal experts in autonomous driving. Owing to Germany’s role as a global hub for car manufacturing, the following paper sheds light on the act’s position within the ethical discourse and how it reconfigures the balance between legislation and ethical frameworks. Specifically, in this paper, we highlight areas that need to be more worked out in the future either through ethical conventions, corporate measures or legal measures and examine how the law can be incorporated into the existing discourse on the regulation of technologies. Based on this examination, we derive implications for future discourse and elaborate on companies’ responsibilities in developing autonomous driving technologies in an ethical sense.

Companies increasingly deploy artificial intelligence technologies in their personnel recruiting and selection process to streamline it, making it faster and more efficient. AI applications can be found in various stages of recruiting, such as writing job ads, screening of applicant resumes, and analyzing video interviews via face recognition software. As these new technologies significantly impact people’s lives and careers but often trigger ethical concerns, the ethicality of these AI applications needs to be comprehensively understood. However, given the novelty of AI applications in recruiting practice, the subject is still an emerging topic in academic literature. To inform and strengthen the foundation for future research, this paper systematically reviews the extant literature on the ethicality of AI-enabled recruiting to date. We identify 51 articles dealing with the topic, which we synthesize by mapping the ethical opportunities, risks, and ambiguities, as well as the proposed ways to mitigate ethical risks in practice. Based on this review, we identify gaps in the extant literature and point out moral questions that call for deeper exploration in future research.

This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium—EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a “Good AI Society”. We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations—to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI—which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society.

The European Medical Information Framework project, funded through the IMI programme, has designed and implemented a federated platform to connect health data from a variety of sources across Europe, to facilitate large scale clinical and life sciences research. It enables approved users to analyse securely multiple, diverse, data via a single portal, thereby mediating research opportunities across a large quantity of research data. EMIF developed a code of practice to ensure the privacy protection of data subjects, protect the interests of data sharing parties, comply with legislation and various organisational policies on data protection, uphold best practices in the protection of personal privacy and information governance, and eventually promote these best practices more widely. EMIF convened an Ethics Advisory Board, to provide feedback on its approach, platform, and the EcoP. The most important challenges the ECoP team faced were: how to define, control and monitor the purposes for which federated health data are used; the kinds of organisation that should be permitted to conduct permitted research; and how to monitor this. This manuscript explores those issues, offering the combined insights of the EAB and EMIF core ECoP team. For some issues, a consensus on how to approach them is proposed. For other issues, a singular approach may be premature but the challenges are summarised to help the community to debate the topic further. Arguably, the issues and their analyses have application beyond EMIF, to many research infrastructures connected to health data sources.