-
17. The Dual Nature of Perceptible ObjectsIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 84-97. 2018.
-
2Works CitedIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 175-182. 2018.
-
1NotesIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 133-174. 2018.
-
2Introduction: The Case against an Aristotelian PhysicsIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 1-9. 2018.
-
134Aristotle on Plato's Forms as CausesIn Mark J. Nyvlt (ed.), The Odyssey of Eidos: Reflections on Aristotle's Response to Plato, Wipf and Stock. pp. 19-39. 2023.Much of the debate about Aristotle’s criticisms of Plato has focused on the separability of the Forms. Here the dispute has to do with the ontological status of the Forms, in particular Plato’s claim for their ontological priority in relation to perceptible objects. Aristotle, however, also disputes the explanatory and causal roles that Plato claims for the Forms. This second criticism is independent of the first; even if the problem of the ontological status of the Forms were resolved to Aristo…Read more
-
121. Motion and Change in Perceptible ObjectsIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 10-22. 2018.This chapter considers Aristotle's requirements for perceptible objects qua movable, changeable, and perceptible, namely that they must be extended in three dimensions, movable in space, and capable of physical contact with other extended bodies.
-
86Aristotle and Scientific ExperimentsDialogue 59 (4): 527-537. 2020.RÉSUMÉBeaucoup ont soutenu qu'il n'y a pas de place pour des expériences scientifiques dans les sciences naturelles d'Aristote : les expériences interviennent dans la nature, mais Aristote soutient que nous devons simplement observer la nature; si nous intervenions, le résultat serait quelque chose d'artificiel ou contraire à la nature. Contre cela, je soutiens qu'Aristote a non seulement effectué des expériences scientifiques, mais a également maintenu qu'il y a beaucoup de connaissances sur la…Read more
-
19. The Role of Teleological ExplanationIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 107-119. 2018.
-
1Index of Texts from AristotleIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 183-196. 2018.
-
110. Conclusion: The Independence of the Material CauseIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 120-132. 2018.
-
12. Efficient Causality in Perceptible ObjectsIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 23-36. 2018.
-
16. Simple Physical Necessity in Objects Made out of the ElementsIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 70-83. 2018.
-
13. The Material Causes of Perceptible ObjectsIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 37-49. 2018.
-
88. Matter and the SoulIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 98-106. 2018.
-
14. The Material Elements and Prime MatterIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 50-58. 2018.
-
15. Simple Physical Necessity in the Material ElementsIn Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion, University of Toronto Press. pp. 59-69. 2018.
-
65Aristotle’s Science of Matter and MotionUniversity of Toronto Press. 2018.Although Aristotle's contribution to biology has long been recognized, there are many philosophers and historians of science who still hold that he was the great delayer of natural science, calling him the man who held up the Scientific Revolution by two thousand years. They argue that Aristotle never considered the nature of matter as such or the changes that perceptible objects undergo simply as physical objects; he only thought about the many different, specific natures found in perceptible o…Read more
-
114Matter and Aristotle's Material CauseCanadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (1): 85-111. 2001.In his metaphysics and natural philosophy, Aristotle uses the concept of a material cause,i.e., that from which something can be made or generated. This paper argues that Aristotle also has a concept of matter in the sense of physical stuff. Aristotle develops this concept of matter in the course of investigating the material causes of perceptible substances. Because of the requirements for change, locomotion, and the physical interaction of material objects, Aristotle holds that all perceptible…Read more
-
51The Object of Aristotelian Induction: Formal Cause or Composite Individual?In Paolo C. Biondi & Louis F. Groarke (eds.), Shifting the Paradigm: Alternative Perspectives on Induction, De Gruyter. pp. 251-268. 2014.According to a long interpretative tradition, Aristotle holds that the formal cause is the ultimate object of induction when investigating perceptible substances. For, the job of induction is to find the essential nature common to a set of individuals, and that nature is captured solely by their shared formal cause. Against this view, I argue that Aristotle understands perceptible individuals as irreducibly composite objects whose nature is constituted by both their formal and their material c…Read more
-
75Compositional & Functional Matter: Aristotle on the Material Cause of Biological OrganismsApeiron 48 (4): 387-406. 2015.Aristotle uses two kinds of material cause in his analysis of biological organisms: compositional matter, which persists through their birth and death;and functional matter, which consists of the organs and functional parts out of which biological organisms are made while they are alive. These two kinds of material cause, it has been argued, have quite different explanatory roles: functional matter is required by biological organisms to perform their essential functions,but compositional matter …Read more
-
3Monte Ransome Johnson, Aristotle on Teleology Reviewed by (review)Philosophy in Review 26 (5): 360-362. 2006.Review of Monte Johnson, Aristotle on Telelogy.
-
3William Jordan, Ancient Concepts of Philosophy Reviewed by (review)Philosophy in Review 16 (3): 176-178. 1996.Review of Ancient Concepts of Philosophy by William Jordan.
-
980Forms and Causes in Plato's PhaedoDionysius 13 3-15. 1989.Gregory Vlastos has argued that Aristotle and other commentators on the Phaedo have mistakenly interpreted Plato’s Forms to be efficient causes. While Vlastos is correct that the Forms by themselves are not efficient causes, because of his neo-Kantianism he has misunderstood the close connection between the Forms and the explanation of change, including teleological change. This paper explores the connection in Plato’s Phaedo between the Forms, the nature of change, and efficient causality, an…Read more
-
Naomi Reshotko, ed., Desire, Identity and Existence: Essays in Honour of TM Penner Reviewed by (review)Philosophy in Review 24 (5): 357-359. 2004.Review of Desire, Identity and Existence, edited by Naomi Reshotko.
-
72Aristotle (review)Ancient Philosophy 29 (1): 217-220. 2009.Review of Aristotle: Metaphysics Theta, translated and annotated by S. Makin
Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
Areas of Specialization
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy |
History of Western Philosophy |
Other Academic Areas |