• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Christopher Nelson

South Texas Community College
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    7
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    4

 More details
  • South Texas Community College
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Southern Illinois University - Carbondale
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2003
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Religion
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
19th Century Philosophy
Continental Philosophy
  • All publications (7)
  •  78
    Living Christianly: Kierkegaard's Dialectic of Christian Existence
    Pennsylvania State University Press. 2007.
    The pseudonymous works Kierkegaard wrote during the period 1843–46 have been responsible for establishing his reputation as an important philosophical thinker, but for Kierkegaard himself, they were merely preparatory for what he saw as the primary task of his authorship: to elucidate the meaning of what it is to live as a Christian and thus to show his readers how they could become truly Christian. The more overtly religious and specifically Christian works Kierkegaard produced in the period 18…Read more
    The pseudonymous works Kierkegaard wrote during the period 1843–46 have been responsible for establishing his reputation as an important philosophical thinker, but for Kierkegaard himself, they were merely preparatory for what he saw as the primary task of his authorship: to elucidate the meaning of what it is to live as a Christian and thus to show his readers how they could become truly Christian. The more overtly religious and specifically Christian works Kierkegaard produced in the period 1847–51 were devoted to this task. In this book Sylvia Walsh focuses on the writings of this later period and locates the key to Kierkegaard’s understanding of Christianity in the “inverse dialectic” that is involved in “living Christianly.” In the book’s four main chapters, Walsh examines in detail how this inverse dialectic operates in the complementary relationship of the negative qualifications of Christian existence—sin, the possibility of offense, self-denial, and suffering—to the positive qualifications—faith, forgiveness, new life/love/hope, and joy and consolation. It was Kierkegaard’s aim, she argues, “to bring the negative qualifications, which he believed had been virtually eliminated in Christendom, once again into view, to provide them with conceptual clarity, and to show their essential relation to, and necessity in, securing a correct understanding and expression of the positive qualifications of Christian existence.”
    Søren Kierkegaard
  •  106
    Review of Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith: Jacob Howland, Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006, xiii + 231 pp, $85.00 (review)
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (1): 53-57. 2009.
    Philosophy of ReligionSøren KierkegaardSocrates
  • A response
    In Robert L. Perkins & Sylvia Walsh Perkins (eds.), Truth is subjectivity: Kierkegaard and political theology: a symposium in honor of Robert L. Perkins, Mercer University Press. 2019.
  •  111
    Kierkegaard, mysticism, and jest: The story of little Ludvig
    Continental Philosophy Review 39 (4): 435-464. 2006.
    Throughout his authorship, Kierkegaard appears remarkably uninterested in the tradition of Christian mysticism. Indeed, in the only two places in the authorship where he broaches the topic directly, the discussion is disclaimed in such a way as to suggest that Kierkegaard really has nothing to say about it at all. However, attending to the successive incarnations of the character(s) named “Ludvig” throughout the authorship – an appellation that harbors an especially self-referential dimension fo…Read more
    Throughout his authorship, Kierkegaard appears remarkably uninterested in the tradition of Christian mysticism. Indeed, in the only two places in the authorship where he broaches the topic directly, the discussion is disclaimed in such a way as to suggest that Kierkegaard really has nothing to say about it at all. However, attending to the successive incarnations of the character(s) named “Ludvig” throughout the authorship – an appellation that harbors an especially self-referential dimension for Kierkegaard – the present paper attempts to elucidate what may, with due reservation, be referred to as the mystical element in Kierkegaard’s thought. The ultimate yield of this endeavor is a vision of “mysticism” that is more act than thought oriented, and a vision of the author “Kierkegaard” that is more delightful than melancholy.
    Continental PhilosophySøren Kierkegaard
  •  111
    Book Review: C. Stephen Evans, Kierkegaard’s Ethic of Love: Divine Commands and Moral Obligations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, x and 366 pages, $140.00 (review)
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (2): 125-127. 2006.
    Philosophy of Religion
  •  103
    Merold Westphal, Levinas and Kierkegaard in dialogue
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1): 51-55. 2009.
    Philosophy of ReligionSøren KierkegaardEmmanuel Levinas
  •  133
    Sylvia Walsh, Living Christianly: Kierkegaard’s Dialectic of Christian Existence: The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 2005, xii and 199 pages, $49.50 (review)
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2): 115-117. 2007.
    Philosophy of Religion
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback