I have recently done a PhD in proximity to the field of Philosophy of Literature. Among other aspects of my study (e.g. parrhesia today), this question may be of interest to philosophers:
What is the relation between one's awareness of non-propositional knowledge acquired by reading a literary piece of art and the way it is put into words when writing about literature (maybe depending on if and where a review or reading report is being published)
From the field of Philosophy of Literature I reference four essays from the collection: Wahrheit, Wissen und Erkenntnis in der Literatur. Philosophische Beiträge (2014), herausgegeben von Christop…
I have recently done a PhD in proximity to the field of Philosophy of Literature. Among other aspects of my study (e.g. parrhesia today), this question may be of interest to philosophers:
What is the relation between one's awareness of non-propositional knowledge acquired by reading a literary piece of art and the way it is put into words when writing about literature (maybe depending on if and where a review or reading report is being published)
From the field of Philosophy of Literature I reference four essays from the collection: Wahrheit, Wissen und Erkenntnis in der Literatur. Philosophische Beiträge (2014), herausgegeben von Christoph Demmerling und Íngrid Vendrell Ferran, Berlin, de Gruyter; Íngrid Vendrell Ferran und Kathrin Wille (2012), „Form und Inhalt. Möglichkeiten der Briefform in der Philosophie]“, in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 60, 5, S. 785-798, pdf open access here: https://www.uni-marburg.de/fb03/philosophie/institut/mitarbeiter/vendrell/form-inhalt_vendrell-wille.pdf , and Lamarque, Peter (2014), The opacity of Literature, London, Rowman & Littlefield International. Happy to discuss! Comments on my study are welcome in any language. Abstract in English: http://tinyurl.com/p63scsb, dissertation open for commentary here: http://tinyurl.com/Koltzenburg-2015-Erlesnis (on Wikiversity, in German)
