• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Cornelius Berthold

Universität Hamburg
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    3
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • Universität Hamburg
    Department of Philosophy
    Post-doctoral fellow
Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  • All publications (3)
  •  42
    “The most noble of any that ever lived in this world”: an encrypted text praising Thomas More’s daughter Margaret, contained in a miniature Qurʾan at the Bodleian Libraries
    with Claudia Colini
    Moreana 60 (1): 95-113. 2023.
  •  28
    Lambertus Willem Cornelis Van Lit (O.P.), Among Digitized Manuscripts. Philology, Codicology, Palaeography in a Digital World, Handbook of Oriental Studies, Section I: The Near and Middle East, vol. 137, Leiden/boston: Brill 2019, 333 pages, including a bibliography, an index of persons and an index of subjects. Available online (Open Access) at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400351, ISBN: 978-90-04-41521-8 (Hardcover), 978-90-04-40035-1 (E-Book)Among Digitized Manuscripts. Philology, Codicology, Palaeography in a Digital World
    Der Islam: Journal of the History and Culture of the Middle East 98 (2): 636-641. 2021.
  •  62
    The Word of God in One’s Hand: Touching and Holding Pendant Koran Manuscripts
    Das Mittelalter 25 (2): 338-357. 2020.
    Koran manuscripts that fit comfortably within the palm of one’s hand are known as early as the 10th century CE.For the sake of convenience, all dates will be given in the common era (CE) without further mention, and not in the Islamic or Hijra calendar. Their minute and sometimes barely legible script is clearly not intended for comfortable reading. Instead, recent scholarship suggests that the manuscripts were designed to be worn on the body like pendants or fastened to military flag poles. Thi…Read more
    Koran manuscripts that fit comfortably within the palm of one’s hand are known as early as the 10th century CE.For the sake of convenience, all dates will be given in the common era (CE) without further mention, and not in the Islamic or Hijra calendar. Their minute and sometimes barely legible script is clearly not intended for comfortable reading. Instead, recent scholarship suggests that the manuscripts were designed to be worn on the body like pendants or fastened to military flag poles. This is corroborated by some preserved cases for these books which feature lugs to attach a cord or chain, but also their rare occurrence in contemporary textual sources. While pendant Korans in rectangular codex form exist, the majority were produced as codices in the shape of an octagonal prism, and others as scrolls that could be rolled up into a cylindrical form. Both resemble the shapes of similarly dated and pre-Islamic amulets or amulet cases. Building on recent scholarship, I will argue in this article that miniature or pendant Koran manuscripts were produced in similar forms and sizes because of comparable modes of usage, but not necessarily by a deliberate imitation of their amuletic ‘predecessors’. The manuscripts’ main functions did not require them to be read or even opened; some of their cases were in fact riveted shut. Accordingly, the haptic feedback they gave to their owners when they carried or touched them was not one of regular books but one of solid objects (like amulets) or even jewellery, which then reinforced this practice.
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback