• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

D. Terence Langendoen

University of Arizona
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    14
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates

 More details
  • University of Arizona
    Department of Linguistics
    Retired faculty
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
PhD, 1984
CV
Alexandria, VA, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Formal Semantics
Semantic Theories
Semantic Phenomena
Lexical Semantics
Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction
1 more
Areas of Interest
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Formal Semantics
Semantic Theories
Semantic Phenomena
Lexical Semantics
Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction
1 more
  • All publications (14)
  •  88
    Seymour Ginsburg and Joseph Ullian. Ambiguity in context free languages. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 13 , pp. 62–89. - Seymour Ginsburg and Joseph Ullian. Preservation of unambiguity and inherent ambiguity in context-free languages.Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 13 , pp. 364–368. - Thomas N. Hibbard and Joseph Ullian, The independence of inherent ambiguity from complementedness among context-free languages. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 13 , pp. 588–593 (review)
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2): 301-302. 1968.
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  85
    Joseph Ullian. Failure of a conjecture about context free languages. Information and control, vol. 9 , pp. 61–65
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2): 266-267. 1967.
    Model Theory
  •  65
    Dative questions: A study in the relation of acceptability to grammaticality of an english sentence type
    with Nancy Kalish-Landon and John Dore
    Cognition 2 (4): 451-478. 1973.
  •  4
    The projection problem for presuppositions
    with Harris Savin
    In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics, Irvington. pp. 54--60. 1971.
    Presupposition
  •  54
    Studies in Linguistic Semantics: Papers Presented at a Conference Sponsored by the Dept. Of Linguistics, Ohio State University, April 14-15, 1969 (edited book, review)
    with Charles J. Fillmore
    Holt, Reinhart and Winston. 1971.
    Philosophy of Linguistics
  •  94
    Linguistics must be computational too
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (3): 470-471. 1979.
    Philosophy of Cognitive SciencePhilosophy of Linguistics
  •  1
    The Vastness of Natural Languages
    with Paul M. Postal
    Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (2): 225-243. 1986.
    Philosophy of Linguistics, Miscellaneous
  •  38
    7. Just how big are natural languages?
    In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Recursion and Human Language, De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 139-146. 2010.
  •  15
    Sets and sentences
    with Paul M. Postal
    In Jerrold J. Katz (ed.), The Philosophy of linguistics, Oxford University Press. pp. 227--248. 1985.
  •  66
    A Note on the Linguistic Theory of M. Terentius Varro
    Foundations of Language 2 (1): 33-36. 1966.
    The Status of Linguistic TheoriesPhilosophy of Linguistics, Misc
  •  23
    The London school of linguistics
    M.I.T. Press. 1968.
    Philosophy of LiteraturePhilosophy of Linguistics
  •  43
    Linguistic Theory
    In William Bechtel & George Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science, Wiley-blackwell. 2008.
    The goals of linguistic theory are to answer such questions as “What is language?” and “What properties must something (an organism or a machine) have in order for it to learn and use language?” Different theories provide different answers to these questions, and there is at present no general consensus as to what theory gives the best answers. Moreover, most linguists, when pressed, would say that these questions have not yet been answered satisfactorily by any theory.
  •  849
    Essays on Form and Interpretation (review)
    Journal of Philosophy 75 (5): 270-279. 1978.
    This review analyzes Chomsky’s rationale for devising a theory of generative grammar to replace the “standard theory” of Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (1965) by one that shifts responsibility for the semantic interpretation of sentences from the forms generated in deep structure to those generated by the entire syntactic apparatus of generative grammar. The shift was very much a work in progress when this review was written, and the outcome it predicted occurred only a few years later with the…Read more
    This review analyzes Chomsky’s rationale for devising a theory of generative grammar to replace the “standard theory” of Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (1965) by one that shifts responsibility for the semantic interpretation of sentences from the forms generated in deep structure to those generated by the entire syntactic apparatus of generative grammar. The shift was very much a work in progress when this review was written, and the outcome it predicted occurred only a few years later with the publication of Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures (1981).
    Linguistics
  •  1
    An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability
    with Thomas G. Bever and Jerrold J. Katz
    Critica 9 (26): 123-127. 1977.
    Syntactic Theories
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback