• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Daniel Schoch

Goethe University Frankfurt
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    9
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Recommended
    2
  •  News and Updates

 More details
Goethe University Frankfurt
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1994
Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, Miscellaneous
Formal Epistemology
Conceptual Semantics
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, Miscellaneous
Formal Epistemology
Conceptual Semantics
  • All publications (9)
  •  35
    How to be a Good Non-Naturalist: Epistemology as Rational Reconstruction in Carnap and his Predecessors
    with Julian Nida-Rümelin, Onora O’Neill, Wolfgang Künne, John Mcdowell, Richard Boyd, Nicholas Rescher, Heinrich Wansing, Yaroslav Shramko, Piotr Leśniewski, Reinhard Kleinknecht, Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz, Hans Rott, Max Urchs, Oliver Robert Scholz, Wolfgang Spohn, Thomas Bartelborth, Carlos J. Moya, Elke Brendel, Mark Siebel, Manuel Bremer, Wolfgang Carl, Wilhelm K. Essler, Hans Julius Schneider, Christiane Schildknecht, Marcus Otto, Simone Mahrenholz, Albert Newen, Christian Plunze, Michael Schefczyk, Martin Rechenauer, Christine Chwaszcza, Bernd Lahno, Raimo Tuomela, Rainer Trapp, Matthias Kettner, Georg Meggle, Lorenz Β Puntel, Richard Schantz, Arda Denkel, Edmund Runggaldier, Thomas Mormann, Nikolaus Knoepffler, Peter Simons, Uwe Meixner, Felix Mühlhölzer, Gerhard Schurz, Martin Carrier, Wolfgang Balzer, Ulrich Gähde, Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Frank Hofmann, Marcus Willaschek, Martin Francisco Fricke, Andreas Kemmerling, Martine Nida-Rümelin, Thomas Grundmann, and Bernhar Thöle
    In Frank Hofmann (ed.), Rationalität, Realismus, Revision / Rationality, Realism, Revision: Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München / Proceedings of the 3rd international Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy September 15-18, 1997 in Munich, De Gruyter. pp. 856-861. 2000.
  •  23
    Verzeichnis der Autorinnen und Autoren/List of Authors
    with Julian Nida-Rümelin, Onora O’Neill, Wolfgang Künne, John Mcdowell, Richard Boyd, Nicholas Rescher, Heinrich Wansing, Yaroslav Shramko, Piotr Leśniewski, Reinhard Kleinknecht, Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz, Hans Rott, Max Urchs, Oliver Robert Scholz, Wolfgang Spohn, Thomas Bartelborth, Carlos J. Moya, Elke Brendel, Mark Siebel, Manuel Bremer, Wolfgang Carl, Wilhelm K. Essler, Hans Julius Schneider, Christiane Schildknecht, Marcus Otto, Simone Mahrenholz, Albert Newen, Christian Plunze, Michael Schefczyk, Martin Rechenauer, Christine Chwaszcza, Bernd Lahno, Raimo Tuomela, Rainer Trapp, Matthias Kettner, Georg Meggle, Lorenz Β Puntel, Richard Schantz, Arda Denkel, Edmund Runggaldier, Thomas Mormann, Nikolaus Knoepffler, Peter Simons, Uwe Meixner, Felix Mühlhölzer, Gerhard Schurz, Martin Carrier, Wolfgang Balzer, Ulrich Gähde, Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Frank Hofmann, Marcus Willaschek, Martin Francisco Fricke, Andreas Kemmerling, Martine Nida-Rümelin, Thomas Grundmann, and Bernhar Thöle
    In Frank Hofmann (ed.), Rationalität, Realismus, Revision / Rationality, Realism, Revision: Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München / Proceedings of the 3rd international Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy September 15-18, 1997 in Munich, De Gruyter. pp. 873-878. 2000.
  •  28
    A structuralist’s solution of confirmational paradoxes
    In Winfried Franzen (ed.), Rationalität, Realismus, Revision / Rationality, Realism, Revision: Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München / Proceedings of the 3rd international Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy September 15-18, 1997 in Munich, De Gruyter. pp. 435-442. 2000.
  •  8
    Rationalität, Realismus, Revision / Rationality, Realism, Revision: Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München / Proceedings of the 3rd international Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy September 15-18, 1997 in Munich
    De Gruyter. 2000.
  •  99
    On the formal connection of the Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument to quantum mechanics and reality
    Erkenntnis 29 (2). 1988.
    It is argued that formal reconstructions of the EPR-argument do not only show semantical incompleteness, but also incorrectness of quantum mechanics together with the projection postulate. The latter has to be rejected because it contradicts Schrödinger's equation. A logical analogon to the problem is given.
  •  98
    Dimensional characterization in finite quasi-analysis
    Erkenntnis 54 (1): 121-131. 2001.
    The method of Quasi-Analysis used by Carnap in his program of the constitution of concepts from finite observations has the following two goals: (1) Given unsharp observations in terms of similarity relations the true properties of the observed objects shall be obtained by a suitable logical construction. (2) From a single relation on a finite domain, different dimensions of qualities shall be reconstructed and identified. In this article I show that with a slight modification Quasi-Analysis is …Read more
    The method of Quasi-Analysis used by Carnap in his program of the constitution of concepts from finite observations has the following two goals: (1) Given unsharp observations in terms of similarity relations the true properties of the observed objects shall be obtained by a suitable logical construction. (2) From a single relation on a finite domain, different dimensions of qualities shall be reconstructed and identified. In this article I show that with a slight modification Quasi-Analysis is capable of fulfilling the first goal for a single observable dimension. We obtain a partition of the so-called Quality Classes representing the pairwise disjoint and exhaustive extensions associated to the "values" of the observable. On the other hand, an example demonstrates that the method fails, as Goodman has pointed out, for a relation expressing similarity with regard to at least one out of many properties. Since it seems to be impossible in general to reconstruct multi-dimensional qualities from a single similarity relation, the constitution of at least as many similarity relations as there are qualities have to be presumed. Then it is possible to state adequate sufficient conditions for the dimension of the observable space, even if some of the similarity relations might depend on others. The concept of topological dimension cannot be used for this purpose on finite sets of observations. We replace it by a set-algebraical condition on the Quality Classes.
    Areas of MathematicsVague Objects
  •  160
    A fuzzy measure for explanatory coherence
    Synthese 122 (3): 291-311. 2000.
    In a series of articles, Paul Thagard has developed a connectionist''s modelfor the evaluation of explanatory coherence for competing systems ofhypotheses. He has successfully applied it to various examples from thehistory of science and common language reasoning. However, I will argue thathis formalism does not adequately represent explanatory relations betweenmore than two propositions.In this paper, I develop a generalization of Thagard''s approach. It is notsubject to the connectionist parad…Read more
    In a series of articles, Paul Thagard has developed a connectionist''s modelfor the evaluation of explanatory coherence for competing systems ofhypotheses. He has successfully applied it to various examples from thehistory of science and common language reasoning. However, I will argue thathis formalism does not adequately represent explanatory relations betweenmore than two propositions.In this paper, I develop a generalization of Thagard''s approach. It is notsubject to the connectionist paradigm of neural nets, but is based on fuzzylogic: Explanatory coherence increases with the fuzzy truth value of theconjunction of explanans and explanandum and decreases with the value of theconjunction of explanans and the negation of the explanandum.
    Explanatory ValueFormal Epistemology
  •  2
    Leibniz’ Metaphysik (review)
    Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 57 (2). 2003.
  •  42
    Ein topologisches Einfachheitskriterium zur rationalen Theorienwahl
    In Georg Meggle & Julian Nida-Rümelin (eds.), Analyomen 2, Volume I: Logic, Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, De Gruyter. pp. 471-480. 1997.
    Falsification
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback