Darwin Deivy Zambrano Castellano

The street situation of many people around the world has caused what is called a social problem, however, there are still no optimal solutions, why is this so? This paper investigates the persistence of homelessness in the context of the prosperity and affluence of the modern era. It questions why, despite social and economic progress, there are still people living on the streets. A critical approach is used to examine the role of language as an ideological superstructure and its relation to material reality. Furthermore, it analyses the impact of capitalism in widening the social gap between the working classes. It explains that homelessness is not a problem unique to our modern era, but has been exacerbated by current economic and social conditions. Despite living in an era of prosperity, the social gap has widened, leading to an increase in the number of homeless people The paper concludes that the solution to homelessness is not simply a matter of language, but requires a change in the socio-economic structures that perpetuate inequality. It suggests that a more compassionate and humane approach is needed to tackle this social problem.

Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the behavior of subatomic particles and systems at very small scales. Unlike classical theories, quantum mechanics introduces elements of indeterminism in the description of physical phenomena. There are fundamental limits to the precision with which certain physical properties, such as the position and momentum of a particle, can be measured simultaneously. This implies that, even if all the initial conditions of a quantum system are known, its future behavior cannot be predicted with absolute certainty. This quantum indeterminacy raises philosophical questions about determinism and free will, as well as their relationship to morality. Determinism holds that all actions and events are predetermined by prior causes, which challenges the traditional notion of moral responsibility based on control and predictability. In contrast, indeterminism posits that there are elements of randomness and variability in the workings of the universe. From a moral and philosophical point of view, the presence of indeterminism in quantum mechanics poses challenges to the attribution of moral responsibility. If our actions are influenced by random events, how can we be morally responsible for them?