David Ekdahl

Background: Autistic adults often report heightened bodily vulnerability in face-to-face interactions, shaped by factors such as social expectations and sensory demands. With the increasing centrality of online communication, it is important to understand how digital environments can shape embodied experiences and social participation for different autistic people. Methods: This qualitative study used phenomenological interviews with 11 autistic adults living in North America and Europe. We interviewed participants, all of whom were habituated users of online spaces, in their preferred modality (text, audio, or video). Thematic analysis, informed by phenomenological attention to embodiment, identified how participants described bodily attention, agency, and connection across online and offline settings. Results: Participants consistently reported offline interactions requiring extensive bodily monitoring, associated with feelings of scrutiny and exhaustion. Online environments, in contrast, often afforded greater bodily ease, enabling shifts in attention away from self-monitoring toward communication. Participants emphasized novel forms of agency afforded in certain online contexts, helpful in fostering a sense of control. They furthermore described online communication as variably limiting or enriching, but frequently as supporting authentic and comfortable forms of self-expression and connection. Discussion: The findings suggest that online spaces can provide distinctive forms of embodied relief and inclusion for some autistic adults, challenging assumptions that in-person interaction is inherently preferable or superior for everyone. Consideration of autistic embodiment can be crucial for understanding accessible, inclusive platforms and for rethinking normative expectations of communication in both online and offline settings

This paper develops a case for esports amateurism by moving from historical and philosophical groundwork to contemporary challenges and practical implications. We first trace how amateurism emerged as a modern sporting category, focusing on British and Danish associational cultures alongside Olympic and collegiate sport reforms. While recognising its historical challenges and exclusionary practices, we distil from this history a deeper amateur ethos oriented toward human flourishing. We then reconstruct the development of esports, from early LAN cultures through the rise of streaming platforms and franchised leagues, to show how commercial and publisher logics structure today’s competitive ecosystem. On this basis, the paper examines how an amateur ethos can reframe organised esports around health promotion, safeguards against exploitative monetization, constructive norms of communication, expanded inclusion, and longer-term participation. The final sections outline what amateur esports can offer educators and civic associations, as well as policy actors seeking to harness competitive gaming as a site of civic formation and meaningful digital play.

This paper introduces co-constitutive imagination as a possible and more robust form of social imagination than those currently articulated in phenomenological literature. Whereas existing accounts - such as collective and shared imagination - emphasise normativity and we-ness, they fall short of capturing how people may in a more robust sense be said to imagine the same objects and worlds in a dynamically sustained way. Drawing on a descriptive analysis of the tabletop role-playing game Dungeons & Dragons (D&D), we argue that imagination in D&D is not merely coordinated between players but co-constituted between them. Co-constitution involves the reciprocal shaping of imaginative content beyond (but not necessarily independent from) coordinated alignment of actions or representations across individuals. Consequently, what is imaginatively co-constituted could not arise independently from any one participant’s perspective. To support this, we identify three central features of this process: accessibility, in that the imagined world and its content is only experientially available through social participation; interdependence, in that what appears is shaped by the imaginative perspectives and acts of others; and immersion, in that the world is sustained through tacit alignment, occasionally revealed through breakdowns. D&D offers a compelling case for rethinking social forms of imagination not as intersubjective achievement - highlighting possible conditions under which co-constitutive imagination may arise.

ABSTRACT Since the advent of the internet, researchers have been interested in the intersubjective possibilities and constraints that digital environments offer users. Some argue that seemingly disembodied digitally-mediated interactions are severely limited when compared to their embodied face-to-face counterparts; others are more optimistic about the possibilities that such technologies afford. Yet, both camps tend towards offering static accounts of online intersubjectivity. What we think these approaches fail to take into account is how users’ intersubjective capabilities on digital platforms can evolve and change over time. Developmental psychology emphasises that intersubjective capabilities build upon and are interrelated to one another, and more sophisticated styles of intersubjectivity only emerge once earlier stages are in place. This is suggestive for analysing intersubjectivity online as it provides a framework for thinking about how an individual’s intersubjective capabilities might develop. We argue that in some cases this can happen through gradual adjustments of our basic intersubjective capabilities to digital spaces, especially those that strive to mimic established forms of offline interaction (e.g. Zoom). In other cases, this can involve more substantial processes of learning to walk and talk again online. Consequently, determining the possibilities and limits of online intersubjectivity is, at least in part, relative to a user’s skill, history, and familiarity with the technology in question.

Critics have argued that human-controlled avatar interactions fail to facilitate the kinds of expressivity and social understanding afforded by our physical bodies. We identify three claims meant to justify the supposed expressive limits of avatar interactions compared to our physical interactions. First, “The Limited Expressivity Claim”: avatars have a more limited expressive range than our physical bodies. Second, “The Inputted Expressivity Claim”: any expressive avatarial behaviour must be deliberately inputted by the user. Third, “The Decoding Claim”: users must infer or figure out the expressive meaning of human-controlled avatars’ behaviour through cognitively onerous processes. With the aim of critically assessing all three claims, we analyze data collected through observations of and interviews with expert players of the avatar-based video game League of Legends. Focusing on Daniel Stern’s (2010) notion of vitality, we analyze the participants’ descriptions of seeing and interacting with other avatars during performance. Our analysis shows that the informants experience human-based avatarial interactions as qualitatively different than interactions with bots, that the informants see the movements of other players’ avatars as having different expressive styles, and that the informants actively use and manipulate this avatarial expressivity during performance. The results of our analysis, we argue, provide reasons for loosening or resisting the three claims concerning the limits of avatarial expressivity.

This article strives to make novel headway in the debate concerning esports' relationship to sports by focusing on the relationship between esports and physicality. More precisely, the aim of this article is to critically assess the claim that esports fails to be sports because it is never properly “direct” or “immediate” compared to physical sports. To do so, I focus on the account of physicality presented by Jason Holt, who provides a theoretical framework meant to justify the claim that esports is never properly immediate and therefore never sports. I begin by motivating Holt's account of physicality by contrasting it with a more classical way of discussing physicality and sports, namely in terms of physical motor skills. Afterwards, I introduce Holt's account of physicality as immediacy and engage with its assumptions more thoroughly to problematize the claim that esports is fundamentally indirect. Lastly, I argue that the assumption that esports necessarily lacks immediacy is based on a narrow understanding of body and, consequently, of space. In response, I offer a different way of thinking about body and space, focusing on the subjective, bodily engagement of the esports practitioners with their practice, whereby physical space and virtual space can be appreciated as immediately interconnected during performance in a hybrid manner. In providing such an account, the article contributes directly to the broader, growing discussion on the relationship between physicality and virtuality in an increasingly digital world.

As screen-based virtual worlds have gradually begun facilitating more and more of our social interactions, some researchers have argued that the virtual worlds of these interactions do not allow for embodied social understanding. The aim of this article is to examine exactly the possibility of this by looking to esports practitioners’ experiences of interacting with each other during performance. By engaging in an integration of qualitative research methodologies and phenomenology, we investigate the actual first-person experiences of interaction in the virtual worlds of the popular team-based esports practices Counter Strike: Global Offensive and League of Legends. Our analysis discloses how the practitioners’ interactions essentially depend on intercorporeality – understood as a form of reciprocity of bodily intentionality between the players. This is an intercorporeality that is present throughout the players’ performance, but which especially comes to the front when they engage in feinting. Acknowledging the intercorporeality integral to at least some esports practices helps fuzzying the sharp division between virtuality and embodied social understanding. Doing so highlights the fluidity of our embodied condition, and it raises interesting questions concerning the possibility of yet other forms of embodied sociality in a wider range of virtual formats in the world.

Screen-based virtual worlds have been described as fundamentally disembodying. Contrary to this, the aim of this article is to provide a phenomenological analysis of bodily presence in one case of screen-based virtuality. By integrating phenomenology with qualitative research methodologies, I explore esports practitioners’ experiences of bodily presence in League of Legends (LoL). Here, descriptions from real-life esports practitioners are analyzed within the phenomenological framework of ‘incorporation’. My analysis shows that the practitioners’ experience and engage with their virtual world not just by incorporating their physical gaming equipment, but also through incorporation of virtual abilities and tools specific to the game world. Having shown that the LoL practitioner’s body spans both physical and virtual space without leaving the body behind, I situate these results within the discussion of virtual presence in video games. I claim that the practitioners’ sense of presence can be accounted for by situating the integrated physical and virtual tools and abilities within the phenomenological framework of the ‘nullpoint’, understood as a bodily field of activity shaped by our incorporated skills and tools.

eSports practice designates a unique set of activities tethered to competitive, virtual environments, or worlds. This correlation between eSports practitioner and virtual world, we argue, is inadequately accounted for solely in terms of something physical or intellectual. Instead, we favor a perspective on eSports practice to be analyzed as a perceptual and embodied phenomenon. In this article, we present the phenomenological approach and focus on the embodied sensations of eSports practitioners as they cope with and perceive within their virtual worlds. By approaching eSports phenomenologically, we uncover ways in which its unique forms of virtual involvement overlap with as well as differentiate themselves from traditional structures of embodiment.