•  135
    The topic to be addressed in this paper, that is, the distinction between the “concept” of time and the being of the clock, divides into two parts: first, in the debate between Albert Einstein and Henri Bergson, one discovers the ground for the diverging concepts of time characterized by physics in its opposing itself to philosophy. Bergson’s durée or “duration” in opposition to Einstein’s ‘physicist’s time’ as ‘public time,’ one can argue, sets the terms for Martin Heidegger’s extending, his on…Read more
  •  34
    Anti-Oedipus: A Practical Metaphysics?
    The European Legacy 14 (4): 463-466. 2009.
    No abstract
  •  23
    Merleau-Ponty et Deleuze demandent « Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? »La naïveté de la pensée et l’innocence de la questionLa philosophie doit reconnaître que son obligation pressante à l’égard de « l’histoire souterraine du problème du monde » implique qu’elle affronte les conditions de sa propre détermination. En d’autres termes, l’historicité de la philosophie est l’histoire du « monde » en tant qu’il devient problématique. Mais ce devenir problématique « n’appartient pas à l’histoire ». Dans l…Read more
  •  22
    How Do We Recognise Deleuze and Simondon Are Spinozists?
    Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 11 (4): 555-579. 2017.
    While typically unapologetic in expressing admiration, notably Gilles Deleuze admits his concern one time, in passing, that Gilbert Simondon's thought might hide a pernicious kind of ‘disguised moralism’, in which the form of the transcendent lurks, the enemy of the philosophy of immanence. Might there in fact be an ulterior motive in Deleuze's concern? But might this potential critique invite its own reversal? That is, might Deleuze's accusation be in fact a strategy for teasing out what, perha…Read more
  •  18
    Merleau-Ponty et Deleuze demandent « Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? »La naïveté de la pensée et l’innocence de la questionLa philosophie doit reconnaître que son obligation pressante à l’égard de « l’histoire souterraine du problème du monde » implique qu’elle affronte les conditions de sa propre détermination. En d’autres termes, l’historicité de la philosophie est l’histoire du « monde » en tant qu’il devient problématique. Mais ce devenir problématique « n’appartient pas à l’histoire ». Dans l…Read more
  •  17
    Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies-A review of recommended and commonly used tools
    with Joan M. Quigley, Juliette C. Thompson, and Nicholas J. Halfpenny
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 25 (1): 44-52. 2019.
  •  3
    Book review (review)
    with J. A. Sheppard, Yasuhiko Tomida, Udo Thiel, Graham Bird, Josie D'Oro, Ross Harrison, and J. M. Vienne
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (2): 421-446. 1996.
  • Reading Proust's mottled screen
    Semiotica 131 (3-4): 377-381. 2000.
  • Book reviews (review)
    with Desmond Paul Henry, Vere Chappell, Beverley Southgate, Antonio Clericuzio, D. A. Rees, Philip Stratton‐Lake, and Alan Richardson
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2 (1): 175-198. 1994.
  • Virtues and Dispositions as Learning Theory in Universities
    In Paul Gibbs, Jill Jameson & Alex Elwick (eds.), Values of the University in a Time of Uncertainty, Springer Verlag. forthcoming.
    Virtue ethics is one of the three normative approaches to ethics. It foregrounds the virtues or moral character of the individual and can be contrasted with approaches that focus on duties or rules, as in deontological ethics, or on the consequences of actions, as in consequentialism. Virtue Ethics are different from deontological and consequentialist ethical forms. They are related to dispositions. Dispositions, as inner states, precede, condition and have some influence over actions. A disposi…Read more
  • Treatise of Nature and Grace
    Philosophical Books 34 (4): 226-227. 1993.