David Torrijos-Castrillejo

The notion of divine providence according to Socrates is explored within the theological framework of his thought, as defended by McPherran. In accordance with this perspective, some texts by Xenophon are studied. In them Socrates appears to formulate, for the first time in the history of philosophy, the argument of design. In human beings, a peculiar manifestation of divine providence can be seen, which privileges the most specific trait of human beings: intelligence. Divinity also reveals itself to be intelligent in its providence, supporting the life and development of living beings that stand out for their intelligence and are called to act in accordance with it. These assessments of Xenophon's Socrates can be confirmed by some pages of Plato's dialogues and by their relationship with some presocratic doctrines.

Aquinas' vision of man is worthy of being proposed in the 21st century as an alternative to the anthropological reductionisms triumphant in today's public discourse. For him, the human being is not a mere animal, neither is a pure spirit who can use his body as if it were an independent entity. This metaphysical and unitary view of the human being is also not foreign to an anthropology that starts from a ‘first-person’ experience. Self-awareness leads the human being to realise that he is corporeal, but it also enables him to reach back to his spiritual condition. Moreover, this implies that our soul is immortal and our action is free, as well as having consequences for our corporeality, which is that of a spiritual animal. Man's spiritual nature makes him intrinsically oriented towards God: the human being is a ‘tree turned upside down,’ because his life is not only based on its material facets, but he must ultimately live with the aspiration to be rooted in God as the goal of his biographical journey.

St Thomas brings together in the crucifixion the double mission of Jesus Christ as Saviour and Master. His spirituality is marked by an intense devotion to the Crucified One, manifested in his synthetic and catechetical works, but above all in his biblical commentaries. The Crucified is Master because the crucifixion reveals the divine power and the fully human life of Christ noticeable in his virtues. In this way, the Crucified One is presented as doctrine and as doctor: he is the best book in which to contemplate the mystery of God and he is the Master who teaches from the chair of the cross.

The purpose of this book is to fill a gap in the Spanish literature that has already begun to be filled in other languages: to provide the reader with simple and rigorous access to two famous commentators on Aristotle from late Antiquity. This also makes an important contribution to the corpus of Neoplatonic authors in the Spanish language. Classical commentaries have become particularly important in recent decades. On this occasion, it is possible to present an important facet of the author of the 'Consolation of Philosophy', as well as to complete our knowledge of Ammonius. This book provides the Spanish translation of the ninth chapter of Aristotle's treatise 'On Interpretation' ('De interpretatione' or 'Peri hermeneias'), its study and edition, also offering the original texts, Greek and Latin respectively, which are difficult to locate in printed version.

Diego de Deza was an important ecclesiastic in early 16th century Spain. Before being ordained bishop, he was the first Dominican to occupy the most important chair of theology in Salamanca, which would later be held by Francisco de Vitoria. As bishop he contributed in different ways to the spread of Thomism, especially with the refoundation of the Colegio de San Gregorio in Valladolid and the Colegio de Santo Tomás in Seville. Especially in his college of Seville he gave indications that indicated to follow Aquinas as a teacher not only for theology, but also for philosophy and the Bible. This article investigates this contribution by contrasting various unpublished manuscripts.

The late Middle Ages witnessed a recapitulation of medieval reflection on beauty. Jean Gerson is an important representative of these philosophical and theological contributions, although he has been largely neglected up to this time. A first dimension of his ideas on beauty is the incorporation of beauty (pulchrum) into the number of transcendentals, i.e., the concepts “convertible” with the notion of being (ens), that is, unity, truth, and goodness (unum, verum and bonum). This article revisits Monica Calma’s study on Gerson’s theory of beauty and suggests new hypothetical sources that may have inspired this aspect of his thought. The second aspect emphasised here is Gerson’s classification of beauty, which entails some similarities to the one of Ulrich of Strasbourg, but also differs from it. Moreover, its incorporation of a division entirely devoted to artistic beauty is highly remarkable.

There are elements in Heraclitus that are enticing to modern readers in that they point toward a certain intimacy of consciousness. Having read the fragments of this philosopher, we propose a reading that harmonizes his assertions about universality with his assertions about self-knowledge, in which we believe we can glimpse the discovery of self-awareness. In Heraclitus’ view, humans possess a soul with an unlimited horizon and a capacity to access the logos. A person must pursue introspection, listen to the logos, and find the unity of all things and himself. This will enable us to gain a deeper understanding of the interiority of self-awareness without sacrificing its connection to the universal. Furthermore, individuals must speak the logos to themselves to act according to it. By acting otherwise, one would be acting against his own inner self.

The Dominican Pedro de Ledesma was educated at the University of Salamanca, where he became a professor. He is considered one of the last members of the famous School of Salamanca. This work studies his contribution to economic thought as regards tax doctrine. In Ledesma’s thought almost a century of moral reflections developed by the Salamanca professors (such as Vitoria, Azpilcueta, Soto…) crystallises, who were echoed by other Spanish authors. Ledesma recapitulates this reflection by providing his personal point of view on the subject in a historical period in which the Spanish influence had reached global dimensions.

The German philosopher Franz Brentano develops his personal thinking by harmonising his favourite sources: Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas and Leibniz. However, he also goes beyond them, introducing a determinism foreign to Thomas Aquinas and eliminating divine punishments from the future life, thus departing from the Christian position also held by Leibniz. Aristotle is credited with Brentano’s Leibnizian ideas: his God is the author of the best of all possible worlds and, within a deterministic paradigm, leads all souls to immortal happiness.

In order to show the relevance of the Presocratic thinkers, certain achievements are sometimes presented as anticipations of some discoveries made by contemporary science. Anaxagoras’ explanation for the origin of the world in particular has been compared to the Big Bang theory by some scholars. The purpose of this article is to show why this theory is very different from Anaxagoras’ view of the origin of the world. For Anaxagoras, the world does not start from a tiny expanding particle. Rather, already before the beginning of the cosmos, there is a totality filled by a primordial mixture. The world emerges in it as a kind of dilating bubble. The cosmos grows by means of a whirl which absorbs the exterior mixture, deconstructing it to give origin to the different things that we know. This vortex is a unique explanation for multiple phenomena, not only helping to understand the origin of the world but also the present cosmos, which is in continuous expansion, since cosmogenesis has not been interrupted.

In the last few years, a new paradigm of the knowledge of the divinity in Aristotle has emerged, affording the possibility of understanding him as efficient cause. In that case, if God is efficient cause and gives rise to teleology, this must have some existential significance for man. We can ask ourselves therefore whether the knowledge of metaphysics can offer some orientation also for ethics. Yet if this were true, the need would arise to deepen the question of how much the gods love men and what would the nature of their relationship be to natural justice. Given that man is born and lives thanks to the divinity, the conclusion is that two consequences follow: a response of religious thanksgiving is needed but also, that since the will of the divinity desires the good for man, the human search for happiness is the same as the fulfillment of the divine law. All this is explained, to a certain extent, in the context of the friendship between man and the divine.