120Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental stateCanadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (5): 742-761. 2018.This paper constructs a theory according to which an intention is not a mental state but an action at a certain developmental stage. I model intention on organic life, and thus intention stands to action as tadpole stands to frog. I then argue for this theory by showing how it overcomes three problems: intending while merely preparing, not taking any steps, and the action is impossible. The problems vanish when we see that not all actions are mature. Just as some frogs are immature frogs, some a…Read more
28Intended and foreseen unavoidable consequencesManuscrito 41 (4): 481-499. 2018.What is the difference between an intended consequence and a foreseen unavoidable consequence? The answer, I argue, turns on the exercise of knowhow knowledge in the process that led to the consequence. I argue for this using a theory according to which acting intentionally is acting as a reason. I show how this gives us a more promising explanation of the difference than the dominant explanations, according to which acting intentionally is acting for a reason.
25of (from British Columbia Philosophy Graduate Conference) This paper attempts to argue for an interpretation of Peter Strawson�s account of moral responsibility that successfully eliminates the threat of determinism. The goal is to capture the spirit of Strawson�s view and elucidate that spirit. I do this by emphasizing an aspect of Strawson�s account that others, like Paul Russell, may find insignificant, and then I demonstrate how this aspect is meant to quash the threat of determinism. Specif…Read more
7Jonathan Dancy, Practical Shape: A Theory of Practical Reasoning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. xi + 185. £30.00 (review)Utilitas 32 (2): 253-256. 2020.
York UniversityDepartment of PhilosophySessional Assistant Professor
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Graduate Department of Philosophy
Toronto, Ontario, Canada