-
7Free at last! Free at last! Thank evolution, free at last!Artificial Intelligence 169 (2): 165-173. 2005.
-
4Using regression-match graphs to control search in planningArtificial Intelligence 109 (1-2): 111-159. 1999.
-
14Planning: What it is, what it could be, an introduction to the special issue on planning and schedulingArtificial Intelligence 76 (1-2): 1-16. 1995.
-
3Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the cyc projectArtificial Intelligence 61 (1): 53-63. 1993.
-
41Erratum: "What does a Sloman want?"International Journal of Machine Consciousness 2 (2): 385-385. 2010.
-
57Response to The Singularity by David ChalmersJournal of Consciousness Studies 19 (1-2): 1-2. 2012.
-
118Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidityIn J. Haugel (ed.), Mind Design, Mit Press. pp. 5-18. 1981.
-
13Mind and Mechanism (edited book)Yale University. 2001.An exploration of the mind-body problem from the perspective of artificial intelligence.
-
23Optimization and connectionism are two different thingsBehavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3): 483-484. 1989.
-
21[Star] Penrose is wrongPSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 2 66-82. 1995.
-
12Higher-Order Thought Rendered Defenseless: Review of Consciousness and Self-Consciousness: A Defense of the Higher-Order Thought Theory of Consciousness by Rocco Gennaro (review)PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 4. 1998.
-
29A little static for the dynamicists review of ShanahanInternational Journal of Machine Consciousness 3 (02): 361-365. 2011.
-
1987On the Claim that a Table-Lookup Program Could Pass the Turing TestMinds and Machines 24 (2): 143-188. 2014.The claim has often been made that passing the Turing Test would not be sufficient to prove that a computer program was intelligent because a trivial program could do it, namely, the “Humongous-Table (HT) Program”, which simply looks up in a table what to say next. This claim is examined in detail. Three ground rules are argued for: (1) That the HT program must be exhaustive, and not be based on some vaguely imagined set of tricks. (2) That the HT program must not be created by some set of senti…Read more
-
4We've been framed: Or, why AI is innocent of the frame problemIn Zenon W. Pylyshyn (ed.), The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Ablex. 1987.
-
19Planning and ActingCognitive Science 2 (2): 71-100. 1978.A new theory of problem solving is presented, which embeds problem solving in the theory of action; in this theory, a problem is just a difficult action. Making this work requires a sophisticated language for‐talking about plans and their execution. This language allows a broad range of types of action, and can also be used to express rules for choosing and scheduling plans. To ensure flexibility, the problem solver consists of an interpreter driven by a theorem prover which actually manipulates…Read more
-
Yale UniversityRegular Faculty
New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Mind |
Philosophy of Cognitive Science |