• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Dwayne Raymond

Texas A&M University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    6
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
  • Texas A&M University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
University of Western Ontario
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2006
College Station, Texas, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
3 more
  • All publications (6)
  •  66
    Matter and Form: From Natural Science to Political Philosophy (edited book)
    with Douglas Al-Maini, Coleen Zoller, Mostafa Younesie, Michael Weinman, Ahmed Abdel Meguid, David Lewis Schaefer, Paul Ulrich, Leah Bradshaw, Juhana Lemetti, Ingrid Makus, Lee Ward, Leonard R. Sorenson, and Steven Robinson
    Lexington Books. 2009.
    Matter and Form explores the relationship between natural science and political philosophy from the classical to contemporary eras, taking an interdisciplinary approach to the philosophic understanding of the structure and process of the natural world and its impact on the history of political philosophy. It illuminates the importance of philosophic reflection on material nature to moral and political theorizing, mediating between the sciences and humanities and making a contribution to ending t…Read more
    Matter and Form explores the relationship between natural science and political philosophy from the classical to contemporary eras, taking an interdisciplinary approach to the philosophic understanding of the structure and process of the natural world and its impact on the history of political philosophy. It illuminates the importance of philosophic reflection on material nature to moral and political theorizing, mediating between the sciences and humanities and making a contribution to ending the isolation between them.
    Political Theory
  •  36
    From Particular to Universal: Drawing upon the Intellectual Milieu to Understand Aristotle and Euclid
    In Paolo C. Biondi & Louis F. Groarke (eds.), Shifting the Paradigm: Alternative Perspectives on Induction, De Gruyter. pp. 269-300. 2014.
  •  121
    Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic
    History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (2): 209-211. 2014.
    In contrast with Aristotle's assertoric logic, which became the logic of the west, suffering only minor modifications at the edges, Aristotle's modal logic appears to be rife with errors. It...
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicHistory of Logic
  •  142
    Polarity and Inseparability: The Foundation of the Apodictic Portion of Aristotle's Modal Logic
    History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (3): 193-218. 2010.
    Modern logicians have sought to unlock the modal secrets of Aristotle's Syllogistic by assuming a version of essentialism and treating it as a primitive within the semantics. These attempts ultimately distort Aristotle's ontology. None of these approaches make full use of tests found throughout Aristotle's corpus and ancient Greek philosophy. I base a system on Aristotle's tests for things that can never combine (polarity) and things that can never separate (inseparability). The resulting system…Read more
    Modern logicians have sought to unlock the modal secrets of Aristotle's Syllogistic by assuming a version of essentialism and treating it as a primitive within the semantics. These attempts ultimately distort Aristotle's ontology. None of these approaches make full use of tests found throughout Aristotle's corpus and ancient Greek philosophy. I base a system on Aristotle's tests for things that can never combine (polarity) and things that can never separate (inseparability). The resulting system not only reproduces Aristotle's recorded results for the apodictic syllogistic in the Prior Analytics but it also generates rather than assumes Aristotle's distinctions among 'necessary', 'essential' and 'accidental'. By developing a system around tests that are in Aristotle and basic to ancient Greek philosophy, the system is linked to a history of practices, providing a platform for future work on the origins of logic
    AristotleAristotelian LogicModal and Intensional LogicEssentialism and Quantified Modal LogicModal L…Read more
    AristotleAristotelian LogicModal and Intensional LogicEssentialism and Quantified Modal LogicModal Logic
  •  104
    Comments on Justin Barrett’s Why would anyone believe in God?
    Sophia 51 (2): 319-321. 2012.
    This review discussion outlines Justin Barrett’s Preparedness Model. This evolutionary model for belief in God is shown to posit a maladaptive mind for infants. Questions about its implications and the supporting data are considered
  •  52
    From a Particular Diagram to a Universal Result: Euclid's Elements, Book I
    Apeiron 44 (3): 211-218. 2011.
    Ancient Greek and Roman PhilosophyNeoplatonists
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback