-
112A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents by Samir Chopra and Laurence F WhiteAustralian Journal of Legal Philosophy 37 (2012): 349-50. 2012.
-
69Critical Reply to'Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic'by Wayne RiggsSocial Epistemology: Review and Reply Collective 1 (5): 3-6. 2012.
-
89To walk or not to walkRes Publica (Parkville, Vic.) 18 (1): 20-23. 2009.To walk or not to walk: Should a batsman acknowledge his own dismissal by leaving the wicket without even waiting for the umpire's decision? David Coady and Samir Chopra examine this flashpoint ethical debate in cricket.
-
33Review of Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3): 1-10. 2001.
-
78Testing for Causation in Tort LawAustralian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27 (1): 1-10. 2002.The traditional, intuitively appealing, test for causation in tort law, known as 'the but-for test' has been subjected to what are widely believed to be devastating criticisms by Tony Honore, and Richard Wright, amongst others. I argue that the but-for test can withstand these criticisms. Contrary to what is now widely believed. there is no inconsistency between the but-for test and ordinary language, commonsense, or sound legal principle.